Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2008 Ford F350 Turbo Diesel 4x4 on 2040-cars

US $26,000.00
Year:2008 Mileage:145000 Color: GREY /
 BEIGE
Location:

Haines City, Florida, United States

Haines City, Florida, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.4
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1FTWW31R58EC00393 Year: 2008
Make: Ford
Model: F-350
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Trim: XLT LEATHER
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, CD Player
Drive Type: 4X4
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 145,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: GREY
Interior Color: BEIGE
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

HELLO,

 

I AM SELLING A FORD F350 TURBO DIESEL NEW TIRES RUNS EXCELLENT EQUIPPED WITH BLACK MAXX CHIP GETS ABOUT 20MPG (SHOCKING) NEW BF GOOD RICH TIRES KENWOOD CD/DVD/NAVI STERO SEATS ARE IN EXCELLENT CONDITION TRUCK HAS SOME SERIOUS POWER. I KNOW WHAT THE TRUCK IS WORTH PLEASE NO TIRE KICKERS LOOKING TO SELL THIS TRUCK SERIOUS PEOPLE CALL JASON 407.341.4600

Auto Services in Florida

Workman Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2947 Gulf Breeze Pkwy, Gulf-Breeze
Phone: (850) 932-3239

Wolf Towing Corp. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Transportation Services
Address: Sun-City-Center
Phone: (813) 928-9389

Wilcox & Son Automotive, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 62 W. Illiana Street Suite C, Windermere
Phone: (407) 440-2848

Wheaton`s Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Tire Dealers
Address: Grassy-Key
Phone: (305) 451-3500

Used Car Super Market ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 3120 W Tennessee St, Ochlockonee-Bay
Phone: (850) 575-6702

USA Auto Glass ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Windshield Repair
Address: 30000 S Dixie Hwy, Sunny-Isles-Beach
Phone: (305) 247-9100

Auto blog

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.

Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT

Tue, Feb 21 2023

When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.

VW going turbo-only in 3 to 4 years

Wed, 18 Sep 2013

This really was a matter of when, rather than if. Volkswagen will apparently be the first manufacturer to phase out naturally aspirated engines in favor of turbocharging its full slate. VW is kind of responsible for ushering in this push towards small-displacement, turbocharged engines that's taken the industry by storm. When it dropped its direct-injection, 2.0-liter turbo in the 2005 GTI it demonstrated that strapping an iron long to an engine can enhance the powertrain as a whole. VW made fuel economy gains, while also giving a linear, non-laggy turbo experience that it has replicated, model-after-model, to this day.
Speaking with The Detroit News, Volkswagen's executive Vice President of Group Quality, Marc Trahan, told the paper that, "We only have one normally aspirated gas engine, and when we go to the next generation vehicle that it's in, it will be replaced. So three, four years maximum."
Really, it's hard to get teary-eyed about either of these engines going away. VW has access to smaller powerplants that could easily match the performance of the 2.5 five-cylinder and the 3.6 V6, while gobbling up less fuel and providing a better driving experience. What we are sad about is that a similar statement about the extinction of NA engines came from the Vice President of Powertrain Engineering at Ford, Joe Bakaj. We'd certainly get teary-eyed over a world without Ford's excellent 5.0-liter V8.