2001 Ford F350 4x4 7.3 Diesel Reg.cab 8 Foot Bed Xlt Decor 156k Miles Tow Pack on 2040-cars
West Chester, Pennsylvania, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:7.3 DIESEL
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Ford
Model: F-350
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Trim: XLT
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 4X4
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Mileage: 156,000
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Exterior Color: Green
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Windows
Interior Color: Tan
Number of Cylinders: 8
2001 ford f350 4x4 regular cab 8 foot bed..7.3 diesel ,auto.trans, pw, dl, truck runs and shifts good..4x4 works and interior is in good shape.. the bed is rusted out and will need replacing for extensive repair. please see pics for visuals..Feel free to email me at tdelgott@faulknerauto.com or call me direct at 484 319 9866 with any questions.Thanks,Tom
Ford F-350 for Sale
- Xl crew cab truck diesel 7.3l v8 dir turbo white
- 2000 f-350 xlt super duty 6 speed black dually 7.3 diesel extended cab(US $7,200.00)
- Lariat auto v-8 diesel 41k miles(US $24,500.00)
- 2006 ford f350 xl turbo diesel 4x4 6.0l v8 long bed crew cab 1 owner 80+ pics(US $10,995.00)
- 7.3 powerstroke turbo diesel project truck 4x4 doesnt start buy this one cheap(US $3,990.00)
- 12 ford f 350 super duty powerstroke diesel 1 ton lariat leather 8' long bed(US $40,500.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Yorkshire Garage & Auto Sales ★★★★★
Willis Honda ★★★★★
Used Car World West Liberty ★★★★★
Usa Gas ★★★★★
Trone Service Station ★★★★★
Tri State Preowned ★★★★★
Auto blog
10 automakers sued over keyless ignitions
Thu, Aug 27 2015Keyless ignition has rapidly proliferated throughout the auto industry to become a fairly normal feature on new cars. It's supposed to offer the convenience of keeping the fob in your pocket and just pressing a button to drive away. However, ten major automakers are now being sued in US District Court over claims that the system is dangerous, Reuters reports. The suit alleges that people are forgetting to shut off the engine, and the lack of an idle timer is the cause for 13 deaths by carbon monoxide poisoning and multiple injuries. The suit currently includes 28 plaintiffs, according to Reuters, but the lawyers are asking for class-action status to potentially add many more. The case goes after a major swath of the industry, including BMW, Daimler, FCA, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Nissan, Toyota, and Volkswagen, plus their related brands like Acura, Infiniti, Mini, and Lexus. In all, over five million vehicles are affected. The assertion here is that people walk away from their vehicle without shutting it off because they believe the engine shuts off automatically. If parked in a garage, carbon monoxide can build up, leading to poisoning. The lawyers claim automakers know this is a problem and also cite 27 complaints to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration about the issue, according to Reuters. The plaintiffs are asking for an automatic shut-off and damages from the companies. These concerns have come up before, though. Toyota previously faced a lawsuit over a carbon monoxide death after a woman accidentally left her Lexus running. Also earlier this year, GM recalled 64,186 examples of the 2011-2013 Chevrolet Volt because owners weren't shutting them off. The problem resulted in two injuries, and the company released a software update to limit the idling time.
How privacy fears are driving automakers in the age of the connected car [w/poll]
Wed, Aug 27 2014A recent GAO report concluded car companies don't adequately disclose how and why they share location data. As cars collect and store more and more data about the whereabouts of their drivers, automakers are responding to critics who say they should be more transparent about how those details are used. Ford is hiring a global privacy policy attorney to craft the company's customer privacy policies in the era of connected and autonomous cars. "In this emerging space, there is an important need to address customer privacy policies," reads a job description posted on the "people and careers" portion of the company's website. "As part of our compliance and ethics organization at Ford, this person will have an immediate and direct impact in shaping existing and future policy and corporate thinking in this area." Ford is creating the new position, based at its Dearborn headquarters, at a time technology advances are outpacing privacy protections. Earlier this year, a report from the federal government concluded car companies don't adequately disclose to motorists how and why they share location data. That report, from the Government Accountability Office, found many car companies did not describe how they shared location data, did not allow consumers to request their data be deleted and that there was a "wide variation" in how car companies retained vehicle-specific or identifiable location data. It noted there is increased risk of location data being used in ways "consumers did not intend." Ford was one of 10 companies the GAO surveyed while compiling its report. Customers are opting to share that data largely by using features like maps and turn-by-turn direction that are run by a vehicle's telematics unit. Depending on the company, it can be unclear how that data is collected, retained or shared. At the time the GAO report was issued, AAA, the nation's largest motoring club, urged carmakers to be more transparent in how they handle data and to offer stronger security protections. Shaping Autonomous Car Regulations At Ford, the new hire could change how the company handles that data. According to the job description, the successful applicant will, "demonstrate visionary thinking around privacy strategy – imagine how consumer and employee expectations around privacy may evolve and how business should adapt, develop approaches that maximize the benefit of data sharing for consumers and business, etc." (Emphasis from Ford).
Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 has a bit of a dyno issue
Tue, 28 May 2013We're of the mind that each and every dyno should come with Murphy's Law painted in big, visible letters down the side. For every ten successful dyno runs out there, it seems there's one where events to horribly wrong. Take, for example, the video below. The clip shows what happens when a Ford Shelby GT500 and a mobile dyno have a bit of a disagreement at the Performance Expo 24 in Sherbrooke, Quebec. We won't spoil the results for you, but we will say there's some substantial carnage involved.
It's unclear just how much damage ensues from the dust up or whether anyone was harmed in the incident, but from the looks of things, everyone made it out without serious injury. If only we could say the same for the machines involved. Check out the video below.