Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

No Reserve ** Lifted ** 99 F250 Lariat V10 ** One Owner ** on 2040-cars

Year:1999 Mileage:51680 Color: White /
 Tan
Location:

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gas
Engine:8
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 1FTNW21S6XEC56981 Year: 1999
Make: Ford
Model: F-250
Mileage: 51,680
Disability Equipped: No
Sub Model: Lariat
Doors: 4
Exterior Color: White
Cab Type: Crew Cab
Interior Color: Tan
Drivetrain: Four Wheel Drive
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Arizona

Valleywide TV Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Satellite & Cable TV Equipment & Systems Repair & Service, Television & Radio-Service & Repair
Address: 5930 W Greenway Rd Ste #10, Peoria
Phone: (602) 354-5557

Ultimate Imports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1900 N McClintock Dr Suite 15, Scottsdale
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Tucson Auto Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 2510 W Wetmore Rd, Marana
Phone: (520) 292-1330

ToyoMotors Service and Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 2818 E Bell Rd, Sun-City
Phone: (602) 971-8137

The Auto Shop Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Alternators & Generators
Address: 901 N Central Ave, Peoria
Phone: (602) 256-6164

Tech 1 Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Radiators Automotive Sales & Service
Address: 8736 West Thunderbird Road #3, Surprise
Phone: (623) 486-4824

Auto blog

180,000 new vehicles are sitting, derailed by lack of transport trains

Wed, 21 May 2014

If you're planning on buying a new car in the next month or so, you might want to pick from what's on the lot, because there could be a long wait for new vehicles from the factory. Locomotives continue to be in short supply in North America, and that's causing major delays for automakers trying to move assembled cars.
According to The Detroit News, there are about 180,000 new vehicles waiting to be transported by rail in North America at the moment. In a normal year, it would be about 69,000. The complications have been industry-wide. Toyota, General Motors, Honda and Ford all reported experiencing some delays, and Chrysler recently had hundreds of minivans sitting on the Detroit waterfront waiting to be shipped out.
The problem is twofold for automakers. First, the fracking boom in the Bakken oil field in the Plains and Canada is monopolizing many locomotives. Second, the long, harsh winter is still causing major delays in freight train travel. The bad weather forced trains to slow down and carry less weight, which caused a backup of goods to transport. The auto companies resorted to moving some vehicles by truck, which was a less efficient but necessary option.

Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Toyota Tundra flunk IIHS headlight test

Tue, Oct 25 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put pickup truck headlights to the test and found that the majority of them were equipped with subpar units. The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was the only truck to earn a rating of "good." The large pickup truck test was comprised of the: 2016 to 2017 GMC Sierra, 2017 Nissan Titan, 2016 Ram 1500, 2016 to 2017 Chevrolet Silverado, 2016 to 2017 Ford F-150, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tundra. The Sierra's headlights earned a rating of "acceptable," the headlights found on the Titan and Ram 1500 were found to be "marginal," and the ones on the Silverado, F-150, and Tundra were rated as "poor." IIHS claims the F-150 was the most disappointing out of the large pickup trucks as both its halogen and optional LED headlights failed to provide adequate visibility during testing. The Ridgeline (which earned a "good rating"), is usually considered a midsize or small truck, though IIHS included it in the field of large pickups. The headlights on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, 2016 GMC Canyon, 2016 Nissan Frontier, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tacoma, which made up the small pickup truck group, all earned a rating of "poor." The IIHS claimed the Colorado had the worst headlights of any truck that was tested, as the base vehicle's units were only able to illuminate up to 123 feet in front of the car. The Ridgeline's headlights, for reference, were able to illuminate up to 358 feet in front of the vehicle. To conduct its test, the IIHS utilizes a special tool to measure how far light is projected out of the headlights in different driving situations. The trucks' headlights were tested in a straight line and in corners, while vehicles with high-beam assist were given extra praise. The headlights on the pickup trucks also mimic the testing that was done on small SUVs and cars earlier this year. Next year, automakers will need to fit their vehicles with headlights that earn a rating of either good or acceptable to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick+. Related Video:

2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid

Mon, 01 Apr 2013

Your Mileage May Vary
As difficult as it is to write this, I was actually excited about the 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid. With the beautiful looks of the newest midsize fighter from Ford and a fuel economy estimate capable of shaming even the stalwart Camry Hybrid, the battery-augmented four-door seemed like a recipe for unabashed success. But appearances love nothing more than swapping our boundless enthusiasm for cold platters of disappointment. The 2013 Fusion Hybrid gets hobbled right out of the gate with a lofty price tag, and real-world driving keeps the sedan from even approaching those EPA figures.
With so many excellent midsize hybrids on the market, is there any reason to consider the newest Fusion Hybrid? Are sharp aesthetics, a well-executed interior and capable driving dynamics enough to overcome the machine's shortfalls? Not from where I'm standing.