Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Ford F-250 Xl Crew Cab 4x4 7.3l Powerstroke Diesel 1-owner Fleet Warn Winch on 2040-cars

US $8,995.00
Year:2002 Mileage:226237 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Moscow Mills, Missouri, United States

Moscow Mills, Missouri, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gas
Engine:8
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 1FTNW21F22ED27959 Year: 2002
Make: Ford
Model: F-250
Mileage: 226,237
Disability Equipped: No
Sub Model: XL
Doors: 4
Exterior Color: White
Cab Type: Crew Cab
Interior Color: Gray
Drivetrain: Four Wheel Drive
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Ford F-250 for Sale

Auto Services in Missouri

Wrightway Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 8813 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Old-Monroe
Phone: (636) 240-9650

Southwest Auto Parts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supplies
Address: 5345 Southwest Ave, Maplewood
Phone: (314) 776-3355

Smart Buy Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Tire Dealers
Address: 1045 S Campbell Ave, Springfield
Phone: (417) 889-2886

Sedalia Power Sports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange, All-Terrain Vehicles
Address: 5004 S Limit Ave, Sedalia
Phone: (660) 829-1829

Raymond Smith Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Glass-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 505 E US Highway 136, Albany
Phone: (660) 726-3223

Payless Car Care Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 605 SW State Route 7, Greenwood
Phone: (816) 229-1997

Auto blog

Consumer Reports says Toyota, Ford, Honda and Chevy are big winners in brand perception survey

Wed, 05 Feb 2014

According to Consumer Reports, the automotive brands that stand out in the minds of car buyers are, in order: Toyota, Ford, Honda and Chevrolet. This news comes after the magazine polled its readers, asking them to take into account vehicle quality, safety, performance, value, fuel economy, design/style, and technology/innovation - which are the factors that car shoppers are most influenced by.
It's important to note that this award is only about perception. In other words, it's perceived quality, not actual quality. "Often, perception can be a trailing indicator, reflecting years of good or bad performance in a category, and it can also be influenced by headlines in the media," said Jeff Bartlett, Consumer Reports deputy automotive editor.
The brand that made the biggest jump in perception amongst Consumer Reports readers is Tesla, which posted an impressive 47-point gain to finish in fifth place. Subaru is also notable for finishing in the top 10, despite being one of the smaller manufacturers doing business in the US. Scroll down below for all the details from Consumer Reports, if you're so inclined.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test

Wed, Sep 29 2021

The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video: