Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford F250 King Ranch on 2040-cars

US $55,120.00
Year:2014 Mileage:3 Color: White Platinum /
 Adobe
Location:

807 Southwest Blvd, Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

807 Southwest Blvd, Jefferson City, Missouri, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:6.2L V8 16V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FT7W2B68EEA42193
Stock Num: 140203
Make: Ford
Model: F250 King Ranch
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: White Platinum
Interior Color: Adobe
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Braking Assist
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Engine immobilizer
  • External temperature display
  • Fixed antenna
  • Flip forward cushion/seatback rear seats
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front Head Room: 40.7"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.1"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 35.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 10,000 lbs.
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Max cargo capacity: 59 cu.ft.
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall Width: 79.9"
  • Overhead console: Full with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power steering
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 40.8"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Rear Leg Room: 42.1"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • SiriusXM Satellite Radio
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Trailer hitch
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 3

Auto Services in Missouri

Westport Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 2171 W Port Plaza Dr, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 576-7339

Sterling Ave Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1841 E Main St, Warsaw
Phone: (660) 438-4599

Santa Fe Glass Co Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 1306 S Commercial St, Strasburg
Phone: (866) 449-9818

Osage Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 6215 Fire Station Rd, Osage-Beach
Phone: (573) 348-4073

North West Auto Body & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 12990 Saint Charles Rock Rd, Bridgeton
Phone: (314) 770-2700

Napa Auto Parts - Horn`S Auto Supply ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Engines-Supplies, Equipment & Parts, Truck Equipment & Parts
Address: 217 S 169 Hwy, Gower
Phone: (816) 424-6479

Auto blog

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.

Ford reveals all-new Everest SUV at Asia-Pacific forum [w/poll]

Thu, 13 Nov 2014

While the Explorer may have shifted from a truck-based sport-ute to a car-based crossover, Ford still offers buyers on the other side of the Pacific a Ranger-based SUV in the form of the Everest. And at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit in Beijing today, the Blue Oval revealed the all-new version you see here.
Previewed in concept form over a year ago and made specifically for the Asia-Pacific market, the new Ford Everest is designed to be more refined on the road and more capable off of it. Like the Explorer once was, the new Everest is based on a stretched version of the overseas Ford Ranger pickup. Depending on the specific market, Ford will offer the new Everest with a range of engines including a 2.0-liter EcoBoost turbo four and two Duratorq turbodiesels - a 2.2-liter four and a 3.2-liter inline-five - mated to a six-speed automatic transmission.
Earmarked to take on the likes of the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado (known in these parts as the Lexus GX) and the Jeep Grand Cherokee, the new Everest promises rock-crawlers even better off-road capabilities. It's got nearly nine inches of ground clearance, over 30 inches of wading depth, a 29-degree approach and 25-degree departure angles and a set of features including on-the-fly adjustable four-wheel drive.

Ford reflects on radical Mustang concept that never reached showrooms

Tue, 25 Jun 2013

The Ford Mustang that we all know and love made major waves in the auto industry way back in 1964 by offering style and reasonable pricing with optional V8 power. Its long hood and short rear deck, combined with a low-slung and sporty cockpit, made a lasting impression in the minds of consumers and car designers alike, and its basic shape has so endured the test of time that it's still in use today.
This being the case, you may be interested to know that the first Mustang of 1964.5 wasn't actually the first Mustang at all, being preceded by a concept car that made its public debut in 1962. This concept was nothing like the car that would eventually make it into production, with a radical wedge shape and a small V4 engine sitting behind the car's two occupants, driving the rear wheels. In other words, the conceptual Mustang was pretty much the complete opposite of the production Mustang besides the name.
Ford has kindly decided go through its massive archive to bring the original Mustang concept back into the public eye. The company goes so far as to pose this question to fans of the pony car: "Should we borrow a few of these style elements for the next iteration of the Mustang?" Check out our image gallery above and then let 'em know what you think in the Comments below.