Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2009 Ford F-250 Super Duty Fx4 Crew Cab Pickup 4-door 6.4l on 2040-cars

US $36,500.00
Year:2009 Mileage:29000 Color: Black /
 Black
Location:

Eustis, Florida, United States

Eustis, Florida, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Crew Cab Pickup
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.4L 391Cu. In. V8 DIESEL OHV Turbocharged
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1FTSW21R79EA18835
Year: 2009
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-250
Trim: FX4 Crew Cab Pickup 4-Door
Options: Navigation, Back Up Camera, Sunroof, Cassette Player, 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 29,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Black

For Sale is my 2009 Ford F-250 with only 29k miles. The truck has every available option including navigation, back up camera, heated seats, etc. Please contact me regarding any questions or to see my pictures. Thanks. 

Ford F-250 for Sale

Auto Services in Florida

Your Personal Mechanic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: 11044 Wandering Oaks Dr, Neptune-Beach
Phone: (904) 571-9529

Xotic Dream Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Leasing
Address: 3615 Henry Ave, Glen-Ridge
Phone: (561) 629-7736

Wilke`s General Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 12030 SE 53rd Terrace Rd, Summerfield
Phone: (352) 245-3747

Whitehead`s Automotive And Radiator Repairs ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Radiators Automotive Sales & Service
Address: 2624 Transmitter Rd, Southport
Phone: (850) 914-0601

US Auto Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 195 NW 71st St, North-Miami-Beach
Phone: (305) 751-6084

United Imports ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 142 Mill Creek Rd, Atlantic-Bch
Phone: (904) 634-7599

Auto blog

Question of the Day: Worst year of the Malaise Era?

Thu, Jun 23 2016

The Malaise Era for cars in the United States spanned the 1973 through 1983 model years, and featured such abominations as a Corvette with just 205 horsepower (from the optional engine!) and MGBs with suspensions jacked way up to meet new headlight-height requirements. There were many low points throughout this gloomy period, of course. The horrifyingly low power and fuel-economy numbers for big V8s during the middle years of the Malaise Era make a strong case for 1974 or 1975— the years of Nixon's resignation and the Fall of Saigon, respectively— as the most Malaisey years. But then the GM-pummeling debacles of the Chevy Citation and Cadillac Cimarron could make an early-1980s year the low point. 1979, the year of the ignominious Chrysler bailout? You choose! Related Video:

Ford Focus EV's slow sales trigger massive incentives

Fri, 25 Jan 2013

The Detroit News reports Ford is having real trouble moving its new Focus Electric. As a result, the automaker is offering substantial incentives in an attempt to lure in more buyers. How substantial? Try $10,750 off of a three-year lease. What's more, the EV can now be had for $37,995 ($2,000 less than its original base price) on top of an additional $2,000 cash discount to buy the EV outright - or you can opt for 1.9-percent financing if you work through Ford Motor Credit. None of which factors in various potential government incentives. Last year, Ford managed to sell a paltry 685 of the 1,627 Focus EV hatchbacks it built.
Ford isn't alone in trying to woo more buyers to its EV effort. Nissan cut the price of its Leaf by a whopping 18 percent for 2013, now down to $28,800 and built in the USA. The move followed the automaker's substantial incentives in 2012.
If you want a Focus Electric, you can now apparently get your hands on one for as little as $285 per month with $930 due at signing for a 36-month lease with 10,500 miles per year.

Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test

Wed, Sep 29 2021

The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video: