Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2008 Ford F250 Xl on 2040-cars

US $25,995.00
Year:2008 Mileage:57484 Color: Gray /
 Gray
Location:

1100 S Sam Houston Blvd, Houston, Missouri, United States

1100 S Sam Houston Blvd, Houston, Missouri, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:5.4L V8 24V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTSW21528EC26231
Stock Num: P3264A
Make: Ford
Model: F250 XL
Year: 2008
Exterior Color: Gray
Interior Color: Gray
Options:
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Fixed antenna
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front Head Room: 41.4"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.0"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Manual locking hubs
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall height: 79.9"
  • Overall Width: 79.9"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power steering
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 41.4"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 41.8"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Trailer hitch
  • Trip computer
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV II
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 57484

Auto Services in Missouri

Weber Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Storage
Address: 5822 McPherson Ave, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 725-9498

Shuler`s Service Station ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 3026 W Chestnut Expy, Turners
Phone: (417) 881-0101

Schaefer Autobody Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 16109 Manchester Rd, Crescent
Phone: (855) 795-5455

OK Tire Store ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: Dugginsville
Phone: (417) 967-3694

Mr. Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Transmission Parts
Address: 302 Business Loop 70 W, Wooldridge
Phone: (573) 441-2358

M & L Auto Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 315 E Broadway St, Fair-Play
Phone: (417) 326-8777

Auto blog

Ford recalls Five Hundred, Mercury Montego sedans over fuel tank woes

Mon, 18 Jul 2011

Ford has announced through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that it is recalling nearly 3,000 examples of its Five Hundred and Mercury Montego (pictured) sedans from the 2007 model year.
The action, which affects 2,945 vehicles, is due to potentially defective welds between the filler neck and the fuel tank, a condition that could result in a fuel leak or the smell of gasoline reaching the occupants. In the worst-case scenario, a leak could cause a fire. Cars with the affected fuel tank problem could see an illuminated dashboard warning light as a result of the evaporative emissions leak being detected.
Ford will inspect and replace the fuel tank at no cost to owners (those who have already had the procedure done at-cost can apply for reimbursement), and the Dearborn automaker will begin notifying Five Hundred and Montego owners beginning August 15. Check out the official NHTSA press release after the jump for further details.

2023 Grand National Roadster Show Mega Photo Gallery | Hot rod heaven

Wed, Feb 8 2023

POMONA, Calif. — From an outsider's perspective, it would be easy to assume that the Grand National Roadster Show has always been a Southern California institution. After all, it celebrates the diverse postwar car culture of the region — hot rods, lead sleds, lowriders, and more. However, the show had its roots in NorCal in 1950 when Al Slonaker and his hot rod club showed their custom cars at the Oakland Expo. The GNRS moved to Pomona, California, in 2004. By then it had grown exponentially and seen about a dozen more car customization trends come and go. However, the show and its centerpiece award, the America's Most Beautiful Roadster prize, celebrate what is perhaps the first of those trends: the American hot rod in its purest form. Today, in its 73rd year, the GNRS is the oldest indoor car show in America. Annually it welcomes 500-800 cars, gathered into special themes like Tri-Five Chevys or Volkswagen Bugs. At this year's show, which was last weekend, a special hall was dedicated to pickup trucks built between 1948-98, including mini-trucks, groovy camper bed conversions, and resto-mods.  However, of all the vehicles presented, only nine are eligible for the America's Most Beautiful Roadster award. Winners get their names engraved on a 9-foot-tall perpetual trophy that was, according to The Ultimate Hot Rod Dictionary, the largest in the world when it debuted in 1950. Slonaker chose the word "roadster" initially because "hot rod" bore slightly negative outlaw connotations in 1950. Only American cars built before 1937 of certain body styles — roadsters, roadster pickups, phaetons, touring cars — are eligible, and they cannot have roll-down side windows.  Cars in the running for the cup cannot have been shown anywhere else before their debut at the GNRS.  Contestants for this accolade essentially build their cars to the a platonic ideal of a hot rod. This year the honors went to Jack Chisenhall of San Antonio, Texas, for his "Champ Deuce," a 1932 Ford Roadster. It's exactly what you picture when you think of a hot rod, but distilled to its absolute essence.  Other standouts included "Green Eyes," a two-tone green 1959 Chevy El Camino  with a heavily metal-flaked bed, "Blue Monday," a 1964 Buick Riviera lowrider, and a personal favorite, "Purple Reign," a purple and black 1951 Mercury. Cars may have started out as tools, but there aren't shows like this filled with custom refrigerators.

Ford fights back against patent trolls

Fri, Feb 13 2015

Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.