2003 F250 Xlt 4 Door 4x4 6.0 Powerstroke Lifted With 20" Rims on 2040-cars
Royal, Iowa, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.0 powerstroke
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Make: Ford
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Model: F-250
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: 4 door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4x4
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Mileage: 222,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Sub Model: XLT
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
Number of Doors: 4
This vehicle got reposessed so I paid the bank off for a friend and then got stuck with the truck because the friend doesn't seem to want to pay me for it. Now I am trying to get my money back by selling it. I have the title in hand free and clear. It's a very nice truck. looks like he put a 6 inch lift on it and 20 inch wheels. I would rate the exterior of the vehicle at 9/10. It has a few minor dings here and there but looks great. The interior I think is the same. Probably 9/10. The truck is in great shape. The 4x4 works awesome. Goes right in and out no problem. It has a 6.0 Powerstroke that needs some attention. It runs rough when it's cold and then smoothes out when it warms up but don't let that scare you away. I think it's very mechanically sound. It sounds awesome and will do 0-60 in under 7 seconds. I checked OBDII codes and the only thing it came back with ICP sensor circuit low so I think a new icp sensor should clear up the cold miss. I am also advertising it locally so if it sells i will end the auction. I can deliver for around $5/mile after being paid in full.
Ford F-250 for Sale
2005 ford f-250 super duty fx4 crew cab pickup 4-door 6.0l
2005 ford f-250 super duty fx4 crew cab pickup 4-door 6.0l
1997 ford f250 x-cab xlt 7.3l diesel 5-spd manual 77k miles 4x4 mint no reserve
2010 f250 xl super duty ext cab long bed 4x4 4wd truck
2008 f250 diesel 4x4 lifted 20s navigation heated leather sunroof powerstoke(US $41,780.00)
With fisher plow-white-4wd-superduty-ladder rack-truck box
Auto Services in Iowa
Woody`s Auto Repair Service ★★★★★
Stew Hansen Dodge Ram Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★
Scotty`s Body Shop ★★★★★
Priority 1 Automotive Services ★★★★★
Perfection Auto Repair ★★★★★
Osborne Oil ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Ford Transit Connect configurator fires up for the whole family
Mon, 18 Nov 2013The second-generation Ford Transit Connect is almost upon us, and to get work- and family-oriented customers ready for the new model, Ford has launched a configurator for both van and wagon versions. Both body styles will go on sale early next year with the base TC Van starting at $22,000, but customers wanting side windows and rear seats will have to pony up at least an extra $3,000 for the TC Wagon.
Ford is definitely looking to get back into the family van business with the 2014 TC Wagon offering three available trim levels, two engines and the choice between five- and seven-passenger seating (with two wheelbases). Like many recent Ford products, a fancy Titanium trim level is offered, and opting for it will cost you - this trim starts at $29,000, and we were able to spec it out with a panoramic roof, tow package and front and rear parking sensors for a little over $33,000.
Businesses looking for a small, fuel-efficient work vehicle now get more options on the TC Van like the choice of split, hinged rear doors or a liftgate (with or without glass), a long wheelbase ($1,000) and Ford's CrewChief vehicle tracking system ($925). Fully loaded, this van is still costs less than the fullsize E-Series. On both Van and Wagon, the 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine is a $795 option, but it is only offered on short-wheelbase models and Ford has yet to release power or fuel economy specs yet. With the standard 2.5-liter engine, the TC will get up to 21 miles per gallon in the city and 29 mpg on the highway.
Aluminum lightweighting does, in fact, save fuel
Mon, Apr 14 2014When the best-selling US truck sheds the equivalent weight of three football fullbacks by shifting to aluminum, folks start paying attention. Oak Ridge National Laboratory took a closer look at whether the reduced fuel consumption from a lighter aluminum body makes up for the fact that producing aluminum is far more energy intensive than steel. And the results of the study are pretty encouraging. In a nutshell, the energy needed to produce a vehicle's raw materials accounts for about 10 percent of a typical vehicle's carbon footprint during its total lifecycle, and that number is up from six percent because of advancements in fuel economy (fuel use is down to about 68 percent of total emissions from about 75 percent). Still, even with that higher material-extraction share, the fuel-efficiency gains from aluminum compared to steel will offset the additional vehicle-extraction energy in just 12,000 miles of driving, according to the study. That means that, from an environmental standpoint, aluminum vehicles are playing with the house's money after just one year on the road. Aluminum-sheet construction got topical real quickly earlier this year when Ford said the 2015 F-150 pickup truck would go to a 93-percent aluminum body construction. In addition to aluminum being less corrosive than steel, that change caused the F-150 to shed 700 pounds from its curb weight. And it looks like the Explorer and Expedition SUVs may go on an aluminum diet next. Take a look at SAE International's synopsis of the Oak Ridge Lab's study below. Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Assessment of Aluminum-Intensive Vehicle Design Advanced lightweight materials are increasingly being incorporated into new vehicle designs by automakers to enhance performance and assist in complying with increasing requirements of corporate average fuel economy standards. To assess the primary energy and carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) implications of vehicle designs utilizing these materials, this study examines the potential life cycle impacts of two lightweight material alternative vehicle designs, i.e., steel and aluminum of a typical passenger vehicle operated today in North America. LCA for three common alternative lightweight vehicle designs are evaluated: current production ("Baseline"), an advanced high strength steel and aluminum design ("LWSV"), and an aluminum-intensive design (AIV).
Want a V8 on the cheap? Buy a work truck
Thu, Aug 3 2017In case you didn't notice, V8 cars have gotten pretty expensive. If you want a modern muscle car like the Dodge Challenger R/T, Ford Mustang GT, or Chevy Camaro SS, you'll need between $34,000 and $38,000 for a stripped out example of one. The cheapest of those is the Challenger, and the priciest is the Camaro. These are also the cheapest V8 cars the companies offer. But if you absolutely have to have a V8 for less, there is an option, work trucks. As it turns out, all of the Big Three offer their most basic work trucks with V8s. And because they're so basic, they're pretty affordable, especially when sticking with the standard two-wheel drive. A Ram 1500 Tradesman with a V8 can be had for as little as $29,840, which is a little more than $4,000 less than a Challenger R/T. For a bit more at $30,275, you can have a Chevy Silverado W/T, almost $8,000 less than a Camaro SS. The most expensive is the V8 Ford F-150 starts at a starting price of $30,670, which is a bit over $5,000 less than the Mustang. Of course you'll be in an ultra bare bones vehicle with few comforts, and the price will go up if you add stuff, but we're bargain hunting here, and sacrifices are sometimes necessary. Besides, what you lose in comfort, you gain in loads of cargo space and towing (try to look at the bright side). Also, as a side note, all three trucks are available with optional electronic locking rear differentials. At the discounted price of these trucks, you still get a heaping helping of power. The most potent of the trio is the Ram 1500 Tradesman with 395 horsepower and 410 pound-feet of torque generated by a 5.7-liter V8. Compared with the Challenger R/T, the Ram is up by 20 horsepower and they're tied for torque. The value proposition is even more stark between the two vehicles when looking at the price per horsepower. Each pony in the Ram costs $75.54, while the Challenger charges you $90.91. The Challenger is also more expensive per horsepower than its close competitors. The F-150's 5.0-liter V8 is just barely behind the Ram with 395 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque. That's still more power than the Challenger, and it matches the torque of the 2017 Mustang GT. On the down side, it still would be down 20 horsepower on that same 2017 Mustang, and it's behind by 60 horsepower and 20 pound-feet on the new 2018 Mustang GT. The F-150 also just edges out the Mustang in the dollar per horsepower measure.








