Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2000 F250 Crew Cab 7.3 Deisel Auto 10" Lift 38" Micky T Tires on 2040-cars

US $20,000.00
Year:2000 Mileage:117000
Location:

Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, United States

Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, United States
Advertising:

I have owned this truck for the past 3 years and have done nothing but baby it.

The only time it ever seen snow was in virgin snow in a hay field .

will deliver up to 20 miles


Auto Services in Wisconsin

Twenty Third Street Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2316 W Fond Du Lac Ave, Muskego
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Truck & Machine Service LLC. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Trailers-Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 4625 Femrite Dr, Cottage-Grove
Phone: (608) 575-3652

Tenhagen Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Diagnostic Service Equipment-Service & Repair
Address: 21445 Durand Ave, Union-Grove
Phone: (262) 878-3945

Superior Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: Mercer
Phone: (715) 682-4000

Speed On 51 Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supplies, Towing
Address: 2528 Center Ave, Beloit
Phone: (608) 754-1045

Sound World ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Home Theater Systems, Automobile Alarms & Security Systems
Address: 1850 W Mason St, Shiocton
Phone: (920) 499-4519

Auto blog

Ford decides C-Max shoppers not interested in fuel economy

Sat, Oct 25 2014

If you say a car – the Ford C-Max Hybrid, for example – is "fun to drive," can anyone really come up with some empirical evidence against your claim? What about calling it "versatile"? We wonder if Ford has been thinking along these lines when it talks about the green little hatch. Ford is refocusing its sales strategy for the C-Max Hybrid after the model took a sales hit on both sides of the Atlantic recently, Automotive News reports. That sales dropoff may stem from the fact that Ford has had to revise its fuel-economy figures downward for the C-Max twice since last year, most recently in June. That made the company's once-proud fuel-economy comparisons with the Toyota Prius kind of pointless. Ford is going a different route, calling the model versatile (which, to be fair it was also doing a year ago), technologically advanced and fun to drive. Since the C-Max has about 50 more horsepower than the Prius, that last part may be true. Ford representatives didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from AutoblogGreen about the mpg-mention-free advertising direction, but we will update this post if we hear back. Sales of the C-Max Hybrid have suffered in the US. Through September, Ford sold 15,245 C-Max Hybrids, down 36 percent from last year. We shall see if a new focus away from the car's lowered mpg numbers helps. At least Ford can be pleased with sales of the C-Max Energi Plug-in Hybrid, which are up 51 percent compared to 2013.

Ford demonstrates Mustang's new Line Lock burnout feature

Tue, 22 Apr 2014

Been saving your pennies for a 2015 Ford Mustang? Put in a few extra shifts or some overtime? Got a great down payment ready? Well, however much you saved for your new pony car, start saving more - you'll need the extra money to spend on tires.
That's because the Mustang will come with a system called Line Lock, which can lock the front brakes electronically, allowing drivers to perform big, dumb, smoky burnouts without moving so much as an inch. It's sort of like launch control, only the average driver might actually use it.
Now, line locks aren't uncommon, particularly in drag racing. Usually, a flip of the switch locks the front brakes. The Mustang, besides offering the system from the factory which is unique in and of itself, looks a bit more involved.

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.