1970 Ford F250 4x4 Pickup Low Miles Ex Firetruck on 2040-cars
Pine Grove, Pennsylvania, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Used
Year: 1970
Make: Ford
Drive Type: 4X4
Model: F-250
Mileage: 79,000
Trim: CUSTOM
Here is a 1970 a Ford f250 4x4 with only 79k miles on the odometer. It was originaly a fire truck an is most likely why it survived the last 44 years. It was a Pa truck all its life as far as I know and has typical Pa rust but not near as bad as most other trucks I have found. It is an unmolested truck and has the factory spotlight, western mirrors, reappolstered seat, and the grill has no dents. The truck runs and drives but the brakes are not in working order. It has the bulletproof 300ci 6cyl and 4 speed manual transmission. It appears the truck may have a hard to find limited slip rear but have not confirmed it. The bed is not original to truck it most likely had a reading type utility box. Feel free to ask questions. You may come and look at truck just let me know. The truck is sold as is no warranty. A deposit of $100 is due imediatly after auction end and rest within 7 days unless other arrangements made. Local shipping is available. You may also contact me at 717-383-1294 Leave message if no answer. |
Ford F-250 for Sale
- 2007 ford f-250 crew cab 8 foot utility bed diesel 4x4 florida truck no rust(US $7,444.00)
- 2007 ford f-250 crew cab stampede edition 4x4 diesel lift 22s(US $21,990.00)
- 2010 f250 4wd crew cab king ranch 4x4 diesel nav sunroof 1 owner texas truck(US $22,750.00)
- 2006 ford f-250 crew cab king ranch fx4 diesel(US $17,990.00)
- 1997 ford f-250 xlt crew cab pickup 4-door 7.3l powerstroke, 4x4, red, f-350(US $21,000.00)
- 1971 ford f-250 camper addition,390cu.,4bbl edelbrok carb.(US $2,200.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Walburn Auto Svc ★★★★★
Vans Auto Repair ★★★★★
United Automotive Service Center LLC ★★★★★
Tomsic Motor Co ★★★★★
Team One Auto Group ★★★★★
Suburban Collision Specs Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Car and Driver lists 10Best for 2013, same as it ever was
Wed, 05 Dec 2012Forgive us for having the distinct feeling of déjà vu, but it certainly feels like we've been here before. By that we are referring Car and Driver and the announcement of its annual 10Best vehicles for 2013. To be sure, it's an impressive selection of cars that combine heart-pounding performance and frugal sensibilities, but it also represents something of a broken record on the part of C/D. We're not so sure that's a flaw, though, as the resulting list is tough to argue with.
Vehicles like the Ford Mustang, Porsche Boxster, and BMW 3 Series have maintained their high-horsepower spots on this list for several years now. Even on the more practical and nimble end, the Honda Accord, Honda Fit and Mazda Miata have not budged. These continued spots are even in light of redesigns for some vehicles such as the Accord, Boxster and 3 Series.
In fact, the only newcomer to the 10Best list this year are the Scion FR-S/Subaru BRZ twins, which knocked out the Cadillac CTS-V. We think it would have been a huge misstep to have excluded the FR-S/BRZ, even in light of the supercharged Caddy's lamentable departure from 10Best.
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.042 s, 7720 u