03 Ford F250 6.0l Turbo Diesel 4x4 Auto Crew Cab Long Xlt Colorado Owned 80 Pics on 2040-cars
Parker, Colorado, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:6.0L TURBO DIESEL
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Ford
Model: F-250
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Trim: XLT
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 4X4
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Mileage: 199,835
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Sub Model: XLT
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Mirrors
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 8
Disability Equipped: No
Ford F-250 for Sale
- No reserve 2008 ford sd f-250 diesel, bad turbo, 1 owner off corp lease
- 2008 ford f-250 sd xl supercab 4wd non-op~sos at odot in salem, or
- 05 ford f250 turbo diesel crew cab 4x4 short bed auto xlt one colo owner 80 pics(US $8,995.00)
- 2005 ford f-250 sd xl supercab 4wd
- 01 ford f250 7.3l turbo diesel super cab rwd long bed xlt 80 pics(US $8,995.00)
- No reserve in az - 2008 ford f-250 xl 4x4 long bed work truck four wheel drive
Auto Services in Colorado
Zarlingo`s Automotive Svc Ctr ★★★★★
Toy Car Care ★★★★★
Tony`s Tires & Automotive ★★★★★
Tire Stop ★★★★★
Rocket Express ★★★★★
Rio Grande Enterprises, LLC ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.
Ford looks to space robots to improve car-to-car communications [w/video]
Wed, 21 Aug 2013Ford has partnered with St. Petersburg Polytechnic University for three years to research various kinds of connected vehicle communications. The university tie-up is part of its study of space robots, NASA systems created to enable space-to-Earth communication, and the university's own development of systems that enable communication between the International Space State and Earth.
The objective is for Ford to engineer layers of robust networks and redundancy systems that will allow your car to speak to other cars, to emergency vehicles, to infrastructure like traffic lights and buildings, and to the cloud. Benefits would come in just about every area of transit, from avoiding accidents, to getting medical workers to an accident more quickly, to improving the flow of traffic during rush hour.
Check out the press release below for details on what Ford wants to learn from the JUSTIN Humanoid and NASA Robonaut R2, and a video of technical leader Oleg Gusikhin discussing his interest in the project.
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.