Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford F150 Xl on 2040-cars

Year:2014 Mileage:0 Color: Ingot Silver Metallic /
 Steel Gray
Location:

1701 E 11th St, Siler City, North Carolina, United States

1701 E 11th St, Siler City, North Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:5.0L V8 32V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTFW1EF7EFB56228
Stock Num: 3233
Make: Ford
Model: F150 XL
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Ingot Silver Metallic
Interior Color: Steel Gray
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Door pockets: Driver
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 41.0"
  • Front Hip Room: 60.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.9"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 36.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 14 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 19 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 7,350 lbs.
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Max cargo capacity: 60 cu.ft.
  • Overall Width: 79.2"
  • Overhead console: Full with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • passenger and rear
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 40.3"
  • Rear Hip Room: 64.6"
  • Rear Leg Room: 43.5"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 65.5"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Tachometer
  • Three 12V DC power outlets
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Type of tires: AT
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors

Welford Harris Inc. is proud of our no pressure, friendly sales process. Please stop by and see us. We'd love to have the opportunity to earn your business !

Auto Services in North Carolina

Wood Tire & Alignment ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 1007 E Main St, Linden
Phone: (877) 638-2409

Wilhelm`s ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 192 N 2nd St, Norwood
Phone: (704) 982-4813

Wilcox Auto Sales ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 3090 E Elizabethtown Rd, Proctorville
Phone: (910) 738-3847

Town & Country Radiator ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 2605 E 5th St, Tar-Heel
Phone: (910) 738-6660

The Transmission Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 713 W Garner Rd, Knightdale
Phone: (919) 772-5990

The Auto Finders ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, New Truck Dealers
Address: 1603 South Miami Blvd, Bynum
Phone: (919) 957-0156

Auto blog

Ford tumbles to second worst in Consumer Reports reliability survey, list dominated by Japanese [w/video]

Mon, 29 Oct 2012

It's no secret that MyFord Touch has had its share of problems since being introduced, but the most recent reliability survey from Consumer Reports shows just how much this infotainment system has affected Ford. Just two years ago, the automaker was in the top 10 for the institute's reliability rankings, but since then, it has tumbled to the second-lowest rung just above dead-last Jaguar. In addition to MyFord Touch, CR also attributes a handful of new products that have had issues right out of the gate.
Compiled from 1.2 million subscriber surveys, this year's auto reliability survey heavily favors Japanese automakers, with eight of the 10 spots hailing from Japan. Toyota brands grabbed the top three spots (Scion, Toyota and Lexus - in that order) with Mazda, Subaru, Honda and Acura filling the next four spots. The only non-Asian automaker cracking the top 10 was Audi at number eight.
Audi climbed a total of 18 spots from last year, and Cadillac and GMC round out this year's top gainers breaking into the top 15. Helping Cadillac's upward movement, the CTS Coupe was named the most reliable domestic car. Lincoln, Volvo and Chrysler join Ford on this year's biggest loser list.

Leno drives Henry Ford II's all-original '52 Ferrari 212 Barchetta

Tue, 17 Jun 2014

The story of the relationship between Henry Ford II and Enzo Ferrari is absolutely fascinating. The two great men of the auto industry had what appeared to be a burgeoning friendship until Ferrari pulled out of a deal to sell his company to Ford in the '60s. The latest car featured in Jay Leno's Garage is a 1952 Ferrari 212 Barchetta that tells the very beginnings of that story.
This Prancing Horse was a gift to Ford from Enzo when the two companies were first thinking about merging, according to the curator of the Petersen Automotive Museum. Ferrari really wanted to show off its best so instead of the 212's normal V12, this car was fitted with the larger 2.7-liter unit from a Ferrari 225. The car has been almost unaltered since then. It still wears its original paint, and it's tires date back to 1954.
The great thing about the Petersen is that unlike a lot of auto museums, the people there actually drive the cars and keep them in working order. Once on the road with Leno behind the wheel, this Ferrari really sings. Unfortunately, he can't open it up too much because the 60-year-old tires really hold things back. Scroll down to watch this amazing piece of automotive history and learn it's possible effect on the styling of the original Ford Thunderbird.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.