2014 Ford F150 Stx on 2040-cars
2605 East State Road 44, Shelbyville, Indiana, United States
Engine:3.7L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTEX1CM0EFC06736
Stock Num: 14565
Make: Ford
Model: F150 STX
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Tuxedo Black Metallic
Interior Color: Steel Gray
Options: Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 49
EPA 23 MPG Hwy/17 MPG City! iPod/MP3 Input, CD Player, Overhead Airbag, TRANSMISSION: ELECTRONIC 6-SPEED AUTO... TRAILER TOW PACKAGE, ENGINE: 3.7L V6 FFV. STX trim, Tuxedo Black Metallic exterior and Steel Gray interior CLICK ME!======KEY FEATURES INCLUDE: iPod/MP3 Input, CD Player. MP3 Player, Aluminum Wheels, Keyless Entry, Electronic Stability Control, 4-Wheel ABS. ======OPTION PACKAGES: TRAILER TOW PACKAGE 7-pin wiring harness and class IV trailer hitch receiver, Auxiliary Transmission Oil Cooler, SelectShift Transmission, Upgraded Radiator, TUXEDO BLACK METALLIC, TRANSMISSION: ELECTRONIC 6-SPEED AUTOMATIC tow/haul mode (STD), ENGINE: 3.7L V6 FFV (STD). STX with Tuxedo Black Metallic exterior and Steel Gray interior features a V6 Cylinder Engine with 302 HP at 6500 RPM*. ======EXPERTS ARE SAYING: Great Gas Mileage: 23 MPG Hwy. ======MORE ABOUT US: The Hubler Auto Group, one of the state's largest employers, has served hundreds of thousands of Hoosiers in our 60 years, and we look forward to serving you!Hubler Ford is conveniently located just off of I-74, Exit 116, in Shelbyville Indiana. We are just 21 minutes east of Indianapolis on I-74, 16 minutes south of Greenfield, and 21 minutes west of Greensburg, and 30 minutes north of Columbus. Horsepower calculations based on trim engine configuration. Fuel economy calculations based on original manufacturer data for trim engine configuration. Please confirm the accuracy of the included equipment by calling us prior to purchase. The Hubler Ford team would like to invite you take advantage of our special vehicle offers, and show you our complete line of inventory. We can help you find exactly what you are looking for. We know your time is valuable. So please contact our team today for information on the vehicle you re interested in or give us call today to schedule your next test drive.
Ford F-150 for Sale
- 2014 ford f150 xlt(US $35,680.00)
- 2014 ford f150 stx(US $37,030.00)
- 2014 ford f150 stx(US $37,525.00)
- 2014 ford f150 xlt(US $38,210.00)
- 2014 ford f150 xlt(US $41,625.00)
- 2014 ford f150 fx2(US $41,735.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
West Side Auto Collision ★★★★★
V R Auto Repairs ★★★★★
Tri State Battery Supply ★★★★★
Tony Kinser Body Shop ★★★★★
Stanfa Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Speed Shop Motorsports ★★★★★
Auto blog
How the Ford F-150 SVT Raptor became a reality
Wed, 01 May 2013The camouflaged Ford F-150 SVT Raptor prototype captured above blazing its way across the desert during a test run left company engineers giggling in amazement, reveals Jamal Hameedi in a new Autoweek video. Ford's global performance vehicle chief engineer, accompanied by senior exterior designer Bruce Williams, sat down with the publication to discuss the concept and development of the automaker's super off-road F-150.
Designing a high-performance pickup in 2008, right when the cost of gasoline was going through the roof, seemed insane at the time, but the team pushed forward with the innovative vehicle regardless. The interview includes plenty of Ford B-roll footage as visual candy, and the conversations include discussions about exterior design, ride comfort, anti-lock brake tuning, suspension engineering, weight reduction and why it was necessary to make the Raptor visually different than Ford's standard F-150. The model's origin story is very interesting, and you can learn more about it by watching the video below.
Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid
Tue, Jun 17 2014It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.
NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe
Mon, 17 Dec 2012According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"