Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford F150 on 2040-cars

US $40,420.00
Year:2014 Mileage:25 Color: Pale Adobe Metallic /
 Pale Adobe
Location:

602 W Rose Ave, Crane, Missouri, United States

602 W Rose Ave, Crane, Missouri, United States
2014 Ford F150, US $40,420.00, image 1
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:5.0L V8 32V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTFX1EF0EFA35084
Stock Num: 14537
Make: Ford
Model: F150
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Pale Adobe Metallic
Interior Color: Pale Adobe
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Door pockets: Driver
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 41.0"
  • Front Hip Room: 60.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.9"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 36.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Max cargo capacity: 41 cu.ft.
  • Overall Width: 79.2"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • passenger and rear
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 39.6"
  • Rear Hip Room: 65.4"
  • Rear Leg Room: 33.4"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 65.7"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • SiriusXM Satellite Radio
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Tachometer
  • Three 12V DC power outlets
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Type of tires: AT
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
  • Wheel Width: 7.5
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 25

Auto Services in Missouri

Turner Chevrolet-Cadillac Co Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1005 E Main St, Park-Hills
Phone: (573) 431-2414

Trouble Shooters ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1709 Highway B, Loma-Linda
Phone: (573) 686-2022

Thompson Buick-Pontiac-GMC-Cadillac-Saab ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1555 E Independence St, Strafford
Phone: (417) 866-6611

The Old Repair Shop ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Truck Equipment & Parts
Address: 5 Rocky Top Ln, Tunas
Phone: (417) 993-5853

Sparks Tire and Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 1665 Scherer Pkwy, Saint-Ann
Phone: (636) 946-5900

Slushers Downtown Tire & Auto Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 309 E Malone Ave, Bertrand
Phone: (573) 471-8473

Auto blog

Driving the Ford Explorer ST and Volvo V60 Cross Country | Autoblog Podcast #613

Fri, Feb 7 2020

In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by West Coast Editor James Riswick. First they talk about driving the Volvo V60 Cross Country and Ford Explorer ST, with some thoughts about the Subaru Outback and Super Bowl commercials as well. Then they dive into the mailbag, answering questions and following up on the outcomes of previous "Spend My Money" segments. Finally they wrap things off with a new "Spend My Money," in which they help a listener pick a new car that will accommodate a new, tiny family member without sucking all the fun out of driving. Autoblog Podcast #613 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Cars We're Driving: 2020 Volvo V60 Cross Country 2020 Ford Explorer ST 2020 Subaru Outback Super Bowl ads Mail bag Spend My Money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.

Ford decides C-Max shoppers not interested in fuel economy

Sat, Oct 25 2014

If you say a car – the Ford C-Max Hybrid, for example – is "fun to drive," can anyone really come up with some empirical evidence against your claim? What about calling it "versatile"? We wonder if Ford has been thinking along these lines when it talks about the green little hatch. Ford is refocusing its sales strategy for the C-Max Hybrid after the model took a sales hit on both sides of the Atlantic recently, Automotive News reports. That sales dropoff may stem from the fact that Ford has had to revise its fuel-economy figures downward for the C-Max twice since last year, most recently in June. That made the company's once-proud fuel-economy comparisons with the Toyota Prius kind of pointless. Ford is going a different route, calling the model versatile (which, to be fair it was also doing a year ago), technologically advanced and fun to drive. Since the C-Max has about 50 more horsepower than the Prius, that last part may be true. Ford representatives didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from AutoblogGreen about the mpg-mention-free advertising direction, but we will update this post if we hear back. Sales of the C-Max Hybrid have suffered in the US. Through September, Ford sold 15,245 C-Max Hybrids, down 36 percent from last year. We shall see if a new focus away from the car's lowered mpg numbers helps. At least Ford can be pleased with sales of the C-Max Energi Plug-in Hybrid, which are up 51 percent compared to 2013.

Aluminum lightweighting does, in fact, save fuel

Mon, Apr 14 2014

When the best-selling US truck sheds the equivalent weight of three football fullbacks by shifting to aluminum, folks start paying attention. Oak Ridge National Laboratory took a closer look at whether the reduced fuel consumption from a lighter aluminum body makes up for the fact that producing aluminum is far more energy intensive than steel. And the results of the study are pretty encouraging. In a nutshell, the energy needed to produce a vehicle's raw materials accounts for about 10 percent of a typical vehicle's carbon footprint during its total lifecycle, and that number is up from six percent because of advancements in fuel economy (fuel use is down to about 68 percent of total emissions from about 75 percent). Still, even with that higher material-extraction share, the fuel-efficiency gains from aluminum compared to steel will offset the additional vehicle-extraction energy in just 12,000 miles of driving, according to the study. That means that, from an environmental standpoint, aluminum vehicles are playing with the house's money after just one year on the road. Aluminum-sheet construction got topical real quickly earlier this year when Ford said the 2015 F-150 pickup truck would go to a 93-percent aluminum body construction. In addition to aluminum being less corrosive than steel, that change caused the F-150 to shed 700 pounds from its curb weight. And it looks like the Explorer and Expedition SUVs may go on an aluminum diet next. Take a look at SAE International's synopsis of the Oak Ridge Lab's study below. Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Assessment of Aluminum-Intensive Vehicle Design Advanced lightweight materials are increasingly being incorporated into new vehicle designs by automakers to enhance performance and assist in complying with increasing requirements of corporate average fuel economy standards. To assess the primary energy and carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) implications of vehicle designs utilizing these materials, this study examines the potential life cycle impacts of two lightweight material alternative vehicle designs, i.e., steel and aluminum of a typical passenger vehicle operated today in North America. LCA for three common alternative lightweight vehicle designs are evaluated: current production ("Baseline"), an advanced high strength steel and aluminum design ("LWSV"), and an aluminum-intensive design (AIV).