Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2012 Ford F150 King Ranch on 2040-cars

US $40,380.00
Year:2012 Mileage:22303 Color: Dark Blue Pearl / Adobe Metallic /
 Pale Adobe
Location:

1700 N Hervey St, Hope, Arkansas, United States

1700 N Hervey St, Hope, Arkansas, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:3.5L V6 24V GDI DOHC Twin Turbo
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTFW1ET6CKD35130
Stock Num: D35130
Make: Ford
Model: F150 King Ranch
Year: 2012
Exterior Color: Dark Blue Pearl / Adobe Metallic
Interior Color: Pale Adobe
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Door pockets: Driver
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 41.0"
  • Front Hip Room: 60.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.9"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 36.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 14 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 19 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Flexible
  • Gross vehicle weight: 7,350 lbs.
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Max cargo capacity: 60 cu.ft.
  • Overall Width: 79.2"
  • Overhead console: Full with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • passenger and rear
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 40.3"
  • Rear Hip Room: 64.6"
  • Rear Leg Room: 43.5"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 65.5"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Tachometer
  • Three 12V DC power outlets
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Type of tires: AT
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 22303

GREAT LOCAL TRADE. ALL VEHICLES 125 POINT INSPECTION. CALL TODAY FOR THE BEST PRICE ON A GREAT LOCAL VEHICLE. WILL BEAT OUT TEXARKANA AND LITTLE ROCK PRICE FROM UR HOME TOWN HOPE DEALERSHIP.

Auto Services in Arkansas

Wingfoot Commercial Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels
Address: 7791 Alcoa Rd, Shannon-Hills
Phone: (501) 771-2341

Superior Tire & Express Lube ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1210 E Oak St, Enola
Phone: (501) 450-7744

Steve Jones Chrysler Dodge Jeep ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1110 Falls Blvd N, Wynne
Phone: (870) 238-8175

Roberts Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 600 W Martin Luther King Blvd, Greenland
Phone: (479) 444-6528

Rhodes Auto Brokers ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Automobile & Truck Brokers, Truck Brokers
Address: 1401 S Main Street, Moscow
Phone: (870) 536-2275

North Arkansas Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 500 S 7th St, Heber-Springs
Phone: (501) 887-9234

Auto blog

2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E, Volvo XC40 Recharge score high in IIHS tests

Thu, Apr 22 2021

New electric cars continue their streak of impressive crash test results. The two latest to go through Insurance Institute for Highway Safety testing are the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E and the 2021 Volvo XC40 Recharge. The former earned a Top Safety Pick award, and the latter picked up the Top Safety Pick+ commendation. Both vehicles got the top "Good" rating in every crash test, as well as the "Superior" rating for vehicle-to-vehicle collision prevention. They deviate when it comes to headlights and vehicle-to-pedestrian collision prevention. Because the Volvo has headlights rated "Good" on all trims, it got that extra "+" on its Top Safety Pick award. The Ford also has high-rated headlights available, but the standard units got the second lowest rating of "Marginal." As for the vehicle-to-pedestrian collision prevention, the Volvo received the second-highest "Advanced" rating, while the Ford was rated "Superior." Among the electric cars IIHS has tested, the Ford and Volvo continue a streak of high scores. The organization has evaluated the Audi E-Tron in both its body styles, as well as the Tesla Model 3, both of which get the Top Safety Pick+ rating. As a result of the XC40 Recharge's test score, Volvo pointed out that it is the only automaker whose entire lineup has received a Top Safety Pick+ rating. Related video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.  

Ford finds flex-fuel engine design plays big role in emissions output

Mon, Jan 6 2014

How bad is ethanol for your engine? There's been a lot of debate on this issue as the US considers upping the biofuel content in the national gasoline supply from 10 percent (E10) to 15 percent (E15). The ethanol industry and some scientists say higher ethanol blends show no "meaningful differences" in new engines while the oil industry says ethanol creates health risks. Researchers working at the Ford Research and Innovation Center decided to take a closer look at how a wide range of gas-ethanol blends - E0, E10, E20, E30, E40, E55 and E80 - affected the emissions coming out of a flex-fuel 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. To see the full report, printed in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, requires payment, but there is an abstract and Green Car Congress has some more details. The gist is that, "with increasing ethanol content in the fuel, the tailpipe emissions of ethanol, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methane, and ammonia increased." At least NOx and NMHC emissions decreased. The researchers say that the effects are due to the fuel and "are expected for all FFVs," but that the way that a manufacturer calibrates the engine will affect NOx, THC, and NMOG emissions. It's this last bit that's important, since the researchers found, "Higher ethanol content in gasoline affects several fundamental fuel properties that can impact emissions. ... These changes can have positive or negative effects that can depend on engine design, hardware, and control strategy. In addition to direct emissions impacts, higher ethanol content fuel can also provide more efficient combustion and overall engine operation under part-load conditions and under knock-limited higher-load conditions." So, as we head towards more ethanol in our fuel supply (maybe), manufacturers are going to need to learn how to burn it most efficiently.

2022 Rivian R1T vs. 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning vs. GMC Hummer EV Pickup | How they compare on paper

Tue, Sep 28 2021

The 2022 Rivian R1T has arrived, ushering in the era of the production electric pickup truck. The Rivian reviews are in, and spoiler alert: They're pretty good. Curious how the new battery-powered truck stacks up to its forthcoming competitors? Well, you've come to the right place. Rivian beat all of Detroit's big automakers to market in the half-ton segment, but probably not by the margin the startup would have liked. Ford's answer is the F-150 Lightning, which is due to enter production early next year, coming hot on the heels of GM's first entry into the space – the GMC Hummer EV pickup – which is scheduled to come off the line late this fall. While all three are pickups, they're aimed at distinctly different buyers, as a perusal of their specifications will reveal. Let's have a look, shall we?   Disclaimer: Before we dive in on this one, we'd like to note that while we've made our best effort to verify the specs provided, the Rivian is brand-new and the others are still in the prototype phase. Some of these figures may be inaccurate or may simply change before production. This is all hypothetical until you can actually cross-shop them anyway, right? Cool. End disclaimer. Let's start with the powertrains. They're all battery-electric trucks engineered on a modular rear-wheel-drive configuration engineered to accommodate (theoretically, anyway) up to four electric drive units. Rivian actually makes the most use of this with a quad-motor setup producing 835 horsepower and 908 pound-feet of torque with its high-output initial model. GMC's three-motor Hummer has the R1T beat with its estimated 1,000-horsepower output, while Ford's (also three-motor) comes in with a far more modest 563 horses. This is an excellent illustration of our above point that these are not all engineered for the same crowd. Ford's F-150, which comes in at a lower price point, is meant to be far more mainstream, as its power output suggests.  This theme continues when we look at the dimensions. Despite the image "Hummer" may conjure, GMC's entry actually needs the shallowest parking space. The Rivian is right behind it, with the work-truck-spec Ford extending more than a foot longer than either. What the Hummer lacks in length, it makes up for in girth. It's the widest by a good 5 inches. The Rivian is only slightly pudgier than the F-150, but it's much closer at that end of the scale.