2010 Ford F150 on 2040-cars
3200 East Main Street, Richmond, Indiana, United States
Engine:5.4L V8 24V MPFI SOHC Flexible Fuel
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTFW1EV1AFB91915
Stock Num: 114208A
Make: Ford
Model: F150
Year: 2010
Exterior Color: Tuxedo Black
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 49743
*** Get Haulin' *** One Owner, Local Trade , GOOD CLEAN CARFAX , A/C, POWER Windows, Locks, Mirrors, DUAL POWER HEATED COOLED SEATS , Drivers Memory Seat , Cruise Control, Tilt Steering, Tinted Glass, Rear Defogger, Fog Lamps, Extra Key, 6 Disc CD/XM Radio , Assist Steps, Locking Rear Axle 3.55 , Power Sliding Rear Window , Towing Hitch , Bedliner, 4x4 , ABS, Airbag, Side Impact, Security , Remote Entry, Rear Camera , And Has Been Through Our Shop!! * * Driving From Out of Town? Call Ahead to Ensure Availability: *877-882-9379* Contact Chad Mitchell for Internet Special Pricing!! ** Fast and Friendly Approval Over the Phone** Be sure to print this ad and bring it to the Dealership , ask for Chad Mitchell and receive my Best Internet Deal **Boat and motorcycle trades welcome**We are a licensed watercraft and motorcycle dealer.** We consider anything you pour gas into! Call, Text, Email or Leave a Message for more information! 877-882-9379 www.StudebakerAutos.com Studebaker Buick-Pontiac-GMC At Studebaker, whatever it takes! www.StudebakerAutos.com Instant Financing Available for ALL Credit Situations! Call Today for Availability: 877-882-9379!! We make every attempt to ensure that vehicle and content descriptions are accurate. Please call toll-free to verify ad information: 877-882-9379!!
Ford F-150 for Sale
- 2005 ford f150 stx(US $10,897.00)
- 2012 ford f150(US $26,690.00)
- 2009 ford f150(US $16,235.00)
- 2007 ford f150 lariat(US $19,995.00)
- 2013 ford f150(US $36,950.00)
- 2010 ford f150
Auto Services in Indiana
West Creek Motor Sports Tire`s ★★★★★
USA Collision of Price Hill ★★★★★
Tire Service Plus ★★★★★
Rob`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
R C Foster Truck Sales ★★★★★
Pro Gear Machine ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Recalls '13 Escape For 11th Time
Fri, Aug 15 2014Only in dealer showrooms for two years now, the 2013 Ford Escape has already been recalled for safety hazards 11 times. The most recent recall for the beleaguered vehicle came Friday, when the company announced it was recalling almost 160,000 Escapes and Focus ST hatchbacks from the '13 and '14 model years because of a wiring problem that could cause the engine to stall. Caused by a faulty wiring harness, Ford said the defect could result in reduced power, hesitation or outright stalling. The company said it knew of no crashes or injuries caused by the flaw. Customers affected will be notified by mail. It was the latest problem for a vehicle beset by recalls from the moment it started rolling off the assembly lines. Starting on July 6, 2012, the '13 Escapes have been recalled for an assortment of problems, including multiple hazards with fuel lines that could result in engine fires, fluid leaks in the engine that could also result in fires, problems with engines overheating, delays in airbags deploying and more. Ford
Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout
Tue, Nov 25 2014Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.
Is it time for American carmakers to give up on dual-clutch transmissions? [w/poll]
Mon, 22 Jul 2013Last week, in the midst of Detroit's first days seeking relief in Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, Automotive News contributor Larry P. Vellequette penned an editorial suggesting that American car companies raise the white flag on dual clutch transmissions and give up on trying to persuade Americans to buy cars fitted with them. Why? Because, Vellequette says, like CVT transmissions, they "just don't sound right or feel right to American drivers." (Note: In the article, it's not clear if Vellequette is arguing against wet-clutch and dry-clutch DCTs or just dry-clutch DCTs, which is what Ford and Chrysler use.) The article goes on to state that Ford and Chrysler have experimented with DCTs and that both consumers and the automotive press haven't exactly given them glowing reviews, despite their quicker shifts and increased fuel efficiency potential compared to torque-converter automatic transmissions.
Autoblog staffers who weighed in on the relevance of DCTs in American cars generally disagreed with the blanket nature of Vellequette's statement that they don't sound or feel right, but admit that their lack of refinement compared to traditional automatics can be an issue for consumers. That's particularly true in workaday cars like the Ford Focus and Dodge Dart, both of which have come in for criticism in reviews and owner surveys. From where we sit, the higher-performance orientation of such transmissions doesn't always meld as well with the marching orders of everyday commuters (particularly if drivers haven't been educated as to the transmission's benefits and tradeoffs), and in models not fitted with paddle shifters, it's particularly hard for drivers to use a DCT to its best advantage.
Finally, we also note that DCT tuning is very much an evolving science. For instance, Autoblog editors who objected to dual-clutch tuning in the Dart have more recently found the technology agreeable in the Fiat 500L. Practice makes perfect - or at least more acceptable.