Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Ford F150 Regular Cab Hard Tonneau Cover 62k Miles Texas Direct Auto on 2040-cars

US $10,980.00
Year:2006 Mileage:62205
Location:

Stafford, Texas, United States

Stafford, Texas, United States

Auto Services in Texas

Yang`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 9523 N Interstate 35, Alamo-Heights
Phone: (210) 657-4013

Wilson Mobile Mechanic Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3830 An County Road 1231, Neches
Phone: (903) 922-3486

Wichita Falls Ford ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 5401 Kell Blvd, Holliday
Phone: (940) 692-1121

WHO BUYS JUNK CARS IN TEXOMALAND ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Recycling Centers
Address: Bonham
Phone: (580) 760-6209

Wash Me Down Mobile Detailing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Car Wash, Car Washing & Polishing Equipment & Supplies
Address: Lewisville
Phone: (972) 201-3420

Vara Chevrolet ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 8011 Interstate 35 S, Lackland-A-F-B
Phone: (210) 924-2000

Auto blog

Ford moving medium-duty F-Series production from Mexico to Ohio

Thu, 27 Feb 2014


A few more Ford trucks will be built in the US in the near future with news that production of the F-650 and F-750 medium-duty trucks will move from Mexico to Ford's Ohio Assembly Plant in Avon Lake, OH. Ford hasn't confirmed a precise timeline for the move, but The Detroit News claims the Blue Oval will make the shift later this year or in early 2015.
As Ford spokesperson Mike Levine reminded us, back in 2011, Ford announced in an investor release that it would shift production "after the [Ohio] plant stops current production of the Ford E-Series vans." According to that release, the Ohio factory will also receive $128 million in upgrades to build the new trucks, plus the F53 motorhome chassis and F59 commercial chassis.

Ken Block shows us around his Ford F-150 RaptorTrax

Thu, Jan 22 2015

From his Fiesta HFHV to his '65 Mustang Hoonicorn, the inimitable Ken Block has some awesome machinery at his disposal. But arguably the coolest of the bunch is the RaptorTrax. Based on the previous-gen Ford F-150 SVT Raptor - the one with the steel frame and V8 engine - Block's back country snowmobile on steroids packs a set of tracks at each corner, a full roll cage, equipment rack, lighting, jump seats, survival gear... everything he could need for a trip off road. The Gymkhana master showcased the beast a couple of months ago on the slopes of Baldface in Nelson, BC, but now he's followed up with a less eye-popping but more informative clip in which he shows us everything his RaptorTrax has to offer. Related Video:

EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate

Mon, 26 Aug 2013


The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.