1994 Ford Lightning Perfect Condition 77,325 Miles, Exceptional And Original on 2040-cars
Northport, Alabama, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.8L 351Cu. In. V8 GAS SVT
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Make: Ford
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Model: F-150
Trim: XLT Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Options: CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 77,325
Sub Model: svt
Exterior Color: Red
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Doors: 2
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
1994 Ford Lightning SVT with 77,325 all original miles and already a collectors item because of the low numbers produced
transmission shift out good
Never smoked in
I've owned this truck for 8 months and I've driven it about 3 times a week and went on one trip which it drove excellent on highway up to 80 mph
Paint is Excellent 10
Interior is Excellent 10
The windshield has 2 very small rock chips but you cant tell their there if your not looking for them, their not in your line of sight at all and its not cracked
Matching Lightning Floor Mats
The exhaust has been upgraded to welded aluminum and sounds great
Dual Fuel Tanks, and is actually pretty good on gas
Fiberglass Bed Cover that locks
Factory keypad and alarm
Inside of the bed has rubber mat and is scratched up because I have used it but you'd never know it from the outside, this is the only flaw on this truck. Everyone that see's if cant believe the condition and ask if it has been rebuilt which it hasn t to my knowledge and I used to do body work and have seen alot of crap people pull. It really has been garage kept from all I can gather from previous owners.
It has an aftermarket cd player and speakers and a middle jump seat from a 2004 ford f-150 because I took out the console which I still have too.
I put new Radius bushings and new front shocks on it when I replaced the rotors and brake pads 3 months ago.
Fog lights work great and headlights are not fogged up at all.
Bumper is the rare optional tube bumper
Tires are in good shape
Seats are like racing seats and have bladders on the sides and back that wrap around you and feel great
The radio has a cord plugged into it and run under dash to plug your ipod or smartphone into. Door speakers have been upgraded to Infiniti speakers
Can be looked at locally or You will have to have it shipped by your shipper (I will meet your shipping agent at his convience)
This had been my dream truck since ford made them in 1993. I dont want to sell it but would like to get a bigger truck to fit my growing family.
Ford F-150 for Sale
2010 ford f150 4dr super crew 4x4 xlt 5.4l v8 sb 3" lift kit one owner(US $25,991.00)
07 f150 xlt 4wd new tires clean carfax local trade nice
2013 ford f-150(US $38,255.00)
Svt raptor 6.2l cd 4x4 locking/limited slip differential tow hitch tow hooks a/c(US $50,995.00)
2012 ford f-150 svt raptor crew cab pickup 4-door 6.2l(US $49,900.00)
Ford 150 4 x 4
Auto Services in Alabama
Waldrop Motor Inc ★★★★★
Super Lube-301 ★★★★★
Stephens Service Station ★★★★★
Samz Auto Service Center ★★★★★
Sales Ford Lincoln Mercury Inc ★★★★★
River Park Transmission ★★★★★
Auto blog
What's in a trademark? Sometimes, the next iconic car name
Thu, 07 Aug 2014
The United States Patent and Trademark Office is a treasure trove for auto enthusiasts, especially those who double as conspiracy theorists.
Why has Toyota applied to trademark "Supra," the name of one of its legendary sports cars, even though it hasn't sold one in the United States in 16 years? Why would General Motors continue to register "Chevelle" long after one of the most famous American muscle cars hit the end of the road? And what could Chrysler possibly do with the rights to "313," the area code for Detroit?
8 car technologies designed to keep you safe
Thu, Feb 22 2018Technologies are always advancing forward, especially in your vehicle. As more safety technologies are being introduced into the market, it can be hard to keep track of everything. So here are 8 technologies designed to keep you safe on the road. Want more coverage? Head over to http://bit.ly/2CcOngW Ford Kia Mercedes-Benz Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Volvo Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video FCA automatic emergency braking
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.