Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1972 Ford F-100 Sport Custom on 2040-cars

Year:1972 Mileage:56210 Color: Green /
 Green
Location:

Liberty, South Carolina, United States

Liberty, South Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:302 V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: F10GEP60566 Year: 1972
Interior Color: Green
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: F-100
Trim: Sport Custom
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: rear wheel drive
Mileage: 56,210
Exterior Color: Green
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1972 Ford F100 Sport Custom......

 

This is a nice driver F100. It has a great running 302 that was rebuilt by the former owner about 5 years ago and has a mild cam and 2 brl carb. It has an automatic transmission that changes as it should. This truck is not cut up or molested in any way. The former owner repainted the exterior, replaced the floor mat and recovered the seat about 8 years ago.  This truck has mostly been sitting in the garage except to get it out and wash it and run it around the block to keep the battery up. Interior looks good and all gauges work along with all lights. It doesn't have power steering or power brakes and no A/C, just heat and radio. Very little surface rust around the bed joints and drip rails. This is a very clean truck but not a show truck just a great driver. It leaks a little oil but very little and doesn't smoke at all. Dash is cracked up around speaker in center. Radio works along with wipers, gauges, lights, heat, and signals. Questions call (864)915-6437 or email me. It is also a short wheel base and paint looks pretty good and not faded. Tires are in great shape. I think I have covered most everything. Thanks and Good Luck! 

Auto Services in South Carolina

Winn`s Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supply-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies
Address: 415 Batesburg Hwy, Saluda
Phone: (864) 445-9466

Watson Imports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 13817 E Wade Hampton Blvd, Travelers-Rest
Phone: (864) 848-0110

Vintage Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 605 Pine Knoll Dr, Greenville
Phone: (864) 292-8785

Twin Lakes Auto Body & RV Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Recreational Vehicles & Campers-Repair & Service
Address: 656 Twin Lakes Rd Seneca, Richland
Phone: (864) 972-7830

Tire Kingdom ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 108 Chalmers Rd, Powdersville
Phone: (864) 277-6866

Tim`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 109 Shepherd St, Tega-Cay
Phone: (704) 824-8269

Auto blog

Enterprise customer billed $47k for Mustang stolen from rental lot

Sun, 05 Jan 2014

A weekend rental of a Ford Mustang GT Convertible sounds like a nice, relaxing way to burn some gas, but one Nova Scotia woman's two-day rental is turning into a months-long headache. In early October, Kristen Cockerill picked up the Mustang from Enterprise Rent-A-Car, and she returned it the following day as stipulated by the rental contract. Unfortunately, she dropped the car off on a Sunday - a day on which the particular Enterprise office is closed - and the car ended up being stolen overnight.
Now, two months later, CBC reports that Cockerill received a bill from Enterprise for the full replacement of the car totaling $47,271 (a base 2014 Mustang GT Convertible currently costs $40,349 in Canada). As it turns out, the fine print in the contract says that the renter is responsible for cars dropped off after hours until it can be inspected the next business day - this is also reflected on the key drop seen in the news report video, which states "vehicles returned after hours are the responsibility of the renter until inspected on the next business day."
It's not clear how much, if any, of that amount Cockerhill will be responsible for once her insurance company gets involved, but if the insurance company refuses to pay, Enterprise will bill the amount to the credit card she provided during her rental. While this ordeal is far over for Cockerhill, it's a good reminder for the rest of us to always read the fine print.

Ford Fiesta banned from SCCA autocrossing because of rollover risk

Wed, Jan 14 2015

Autocross can be a great way to break into motorsports, especially at SCCA events that allow run-of-the-mill, street-legal vehicles to be run through the cones in parking lots across the country. But while a wide array of vehicles are eligible, not every one is. And now the Ford Fiesta has been removed from the list of qualifying vehicles in the Sports Car Club of America's Street category for solo events. The removal of the Fiesta was publicized in the latest issue of the SCCA's Fastrack News bulletin, which stated that, due to roll-over risk, Fiestas "do not meet the requirements and are to be removed" from the HS category of eligible vehicles. H Stock (or HS for short) is the lowest category of vehicles certified by the SCCA for use in sanctioned events. The disqualification applies to Fiestas from the 2011 model year onwards, and does not apply to the Fiesta ST, which remains eligible. Of course the Fiesta isn't the only model deemed ineligible for SCCA autocross events. According to Jalopnik, other small hatchbacks and crossovers including the Dodge Caliber, Fiat 500, Scion xB and iQ, Nissan Juke and Mini Countryman are also prohibited from competition. We've reached out to both Ford and the SCCA for clarification on the issue, and will issue an update if and when we receive any substantial information.

NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights

Sat, Aug 15 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.