1972 Ford F-100 Ranger Xlt.. V8.. Auto.. 55k Miles.. A/c .. 1 Awesome Truck . on 2040-cars
Shawsville, Virginia, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:360 CI V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-100
Trim: 2-Door Regular Cab
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: RWD
Options: Cassette Player
Mileage: 55,105
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Sub Model: Ranger XLT
Exterior Color: See Below
Interior Color: See Below
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Ford F-100 for Sale
1956 ford f-100 pickup*big window*custom cab*original paint*ca truck*rust free*(US $20,000.00)
1948 ford street hot rod , rat rod/ shop truck(US $9,750.00)
1961 ford truck rare stepside chevy powered(US $7,000.00)
1950 ford pickup with good title and chevy small block(US $4,700.00)
1959 ford f100 4x4 great project(US $5,500.00)
1966 ford f-100 pickup(US $12,000.00)
Auto Services in Virginia
Wade`s First Stop Auto Repair ★★★★★
Virginia Tire & Auto of Ashburn ★★★★★
The Body Works of VA INC ★★★★★
Superior Transmission Service Inc ★★★★★
Straight Up Automotive Service ★★★★★
Steve`s Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy
Thu, Jan 8 2015With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.
8 car technologies designed to keep you safe
Thu, Feb 22 2018Technologies are always advancing forward, especially in your vehicle. As more safety technologies are being introduced into the market, it can be hard to keep track of everything. So here are 8 technologies designed to keep you safe on the road. Want more coverage? Head over to http://bit.ly/2CcOngW Ford Kia Mercedes-Benz Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Volvo Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video FCA automatic emergency braking
Ford reports $3B profit in Q4, $6.9B for the year
Tue, 28 Jan 2014Good news out of Dearborn today, as Ford announced $3 billion in profit for the last quarter of 2013, a 90-percent increase over the same period of 2012. Net income for all of last year, meanwhile, jumped to $7.2 billion from $5.7 billion in 2012, while pre-tax profits sat at a decade-topping $6.9 billion for all of 2013.
The results of the substantial profit increases are bigger profit-sharing checks for UAW employees. How big? A record $8,800 on average for 47,000 UAW workers, making 2013 the biggest year for profit sharing in Ford history. In total, $414 million will be paid as part of the profit-sharing scheme.
Now, it should be pointed out that a fair portion of Ford's Q4 profits were due to tax benefits, totaling $2.1 billion, according to Automotive News. Total profits would have also been higher, had there not been a significant recall on the Escape, as well as plant issues in South America.