Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Ford F100 Long Bed, 3 Speed, V8, 2wd, 57,000 Miles, Runs Great on 2040-cars

Year:1966 Mileage:57700 Color: Red /
 Red
Location:

Bremen, Indiana, United States

Bremen, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:302 V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: F10YN776658 Year: 1966
Interior Color: Red
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: F-100
Trim: CUSTOM CAB
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: 2 WD
Mileage: 57,700
Exterior Color: Red
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"ORIGINALLY WHITE, SOME PAINT SCRATCHES"

I am selling my 1966 Ford F100 1/2 ton 2wd truck. The truck is a long bed. This has been a good farm truck and is reliable. It has manual steering and manual brakes. This truck has been repainted previous to my owning it. Some scratches and minor dings. One door has scratches and dings. It was originally white. The truck is basically rust free except for the floor pans, especially the driver side. Frame and bed are very solid. Has a rear hitch and wiring. Transmission is a 3 on the tree and the clutch is very good and the throw-out bearing was just replaced. Tires are good and all hold air with no leaks. New rear brakes this spring. I changed the engine valve seals about 2 years ago and resealed the valve covers. The 302 is not the original engine and starts very easy and runs very good. Does not burn oil or smoke. Lights work and am radio works, wipers work and are new. Dual exhaust sounds good. Truck is for sale locally and I reserve the right to end the auction early. Please ask questions if you have some, before bidding, I will do my best to answer them promptly. I have the clear title on hand. Local pick up only in Northern Indiana.  

Auto Services in Indiana

USA Mufflers And Brakes ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 5960 Broadway, Portage
Phone: (219) 980-8800

Total Auto Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 8419 Virginia St, New-Chicago
Phone: (219) 576-6460

Tieman Tire of Bloomington Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers, Wheels
Address: 2002 S Yost Ave, Gosport
Phone: (812) 336-6283

Stoops Buick GMC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4055 W Clara Ln, Hobbs
Phone: (765) 273-6904

Stephens Honda Hyundai ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: Indianapolis
Phone: (812) 336-6865

Southworth Ford Lincoln ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1430 N Baldwin Ave, Van-Buren
Phone: (765) 613-0843

Auto blog

Autoblog joins Elon Musk and Danica Patrick in accepting ALS Ice Bucket Challenge

Tue, 19 Aug 2014

Unless you've been living in an off-the-grid cabin in the woods for the last couple of weeks or abstain entirely from social media activities, you've probably seen someone you know dump a bucket of ice and water over their own head recently. While the origins of the so-called Ice Bucket Challenge are shrouded in a history typical of Internet memes, its effectiveness in raising money and awareness for the ALS Association has been astonishing.
Celebrities from the worlds of entertainment, sports, technology and more have generated untold millions of video views in support of the organization that is helping patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS, better known as Lou Gehrig's Disease), and generated a much needed influx of cash, as well. Recent reports have some $15.6M raised in the last two weeks.
Of course, the big-hearted world of automotive celebrities has taken part in the drenching charity effort as well. Follow on below for some of the biggest names on four wheels getting iced for charity, with a smattering of your favorite Autobloggers thrown in for good measure.

BMW to follow Honda back into F1?

Mon, 14 Apr 2014

The economic downturn wrought devastating effects on motor racing. Formula One alone lost half its engine suppliers when Honda left at the end of the 2008 season, and both BMW and Toyota followed at the end of 2009. But things are looking up again. Cosworth may have dropped out this season, reducing the engine suppliers to three: Ferrari, Renault and Mercedes, the latter of which admits that it may have left had the engine formula not changed. But Mercedes has stayed and is dominating the championship. Honda is coming back next season. And word around the paddock is it may not be the only one.
According to Giancarlo Minardi - founder of the team now known as Scuderia Toro Rosso - BMW engineers have been conspicuously spotted lately at F1 test sessions and grands prix, lending to speculation that the new engine regulations may entice the Bavarian automaker back into the series. According to Minardi, BMW's marketing division is pushing for the automaker's return to F1, with the board slated to make a decision in May. BMW would be more likely to consider an engine-supply deal rather than taking a team over like it had with Sauber, but with which team or teams it might collaborate remains a big question mark at this point.
As if that's not enough, Ford is said to be considering taking over Cosworth's aborted V6 turbo engine program to take both outfits back into the sport as well. Cosworth supplied F1 engines under the Ford banner for years, but returned under its own name for four seasons from 2010 through 2013 before shuttering its program to develop an engine to meet the new regulations adopted this season.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.