1966 Ford F-100 Pickup Base 4.9l on 2040-cars
Farmington, Michigan, United States
Engine:4.9L 300Cu. In. l6 GAS Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:U/K
For Sale By:Private Seller
Fuel Type:GAS
Mileage: 44,673
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: Blue
Model: F-100 Pickup
Interior Color: Blue
Trim: Base
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: U/K
Number of Cylinders: 6
Options: Cassette Player
1966 FORD F-100
NICE PICKUP TRUCK
WAS DAILY DRIVER, PRETTY SOLID AND ORIGINAL THOUGHOUT
ENGINE VERY SOLID, NO BANGS, CLUNKS, TINGS ECT..
DOES NOT BURN OIL, STARTS AND RUNS CONSISTANTLY
CLUTCH AND GEARS SOLID, ALL ORIGINAL EXCEPT STEREO AND TACHOMETER ADDED TO STEERING COLUMN
THE NEEDS, L-FRONT WHEEL CYLINDER, POSSIBLE BRAKE PADS, L-FRONT LOWER SHOCK MOUNT IS THERE BUT HAS COME OFF, EXHAUST IS SOLID BUT WEAK
THIS IS A GREAT OLD TRUCK, RESTORE AND TAKE TO SHOWS OR JUST FIX THE BRAKES, I HAVE THE PARTS IN THE BOX READY TO GO ON AND DRIVE AROUND LOOKING PRETTY DARN COOL!
THIS IS LISTED LOCALLY AS WELL AND FIRST ONE WITH CASH DRIVES IT AWAY!
GOOD LUCK AND HAPPY BIDDING!
Ford F-100 for Sale
1954 ford f100 truck(US $10,000.00)
1983 ford f100 f-100 short bed step side pickup plus offy 4bbl & extra parts(US $5,395.00)
1965 ford f100 pickup very nice original survivor none better daily driver nice(US $3,450.00)
1953 ford f-100 stepside project restore rat rod(US $1,200.00)
1978 ford f100 4x4 hi boy(US $4,500.00)
2wd f100 project truck
Auto Services in Michigan
Zielke Tires & Towing ★★★★★
Your Auto Service Inc ★★★★★
Victory Motors ★★★★★
Tireman Central Auto Center ★★★★★
Thomas Auto Collision ★★★★★
Tel-Ford Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
2016 Tech of the Year | Autoblog Minute
Thu, Oct 29 2015Deliberation on the winners of Autoblog's Tech of the Year Award is under way. Nominees for best car in 2016 are: the Tesla Model S, the Chevy Volt and the BMW 7 series. Nominees for best tech in 2016 are: Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, VW's MiB II with AppConnect, Ford Sync 3, Audi Virtual Cockpit, the Smart Cross Connect App, and Volvo Sensus. Autoblog's Chris McGraw reports on this edition of Autoblog Minute. Audi BMW Chevrolet Ford smart Tesla Volvo Technology of the Year Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video volt android auto ford sync 3
Ford won't be releasing GT500 lap times for the 'Ring, or any other car
Wed, 27 Nov 2013Trucks have towing capacity, EVs have driving range and performance cars have Nürburgring lap times. What do all three have in common? They should all be taken with a grain of salt. Currently, there is no sanctioned way to record lap times or verify production-spec cars - a lesson we recently learned with the 2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo - and until there is a way to do so (and there probably never will be), we'll never officially know the actual time it took for Ford to lap the 'Ring with its ultra-powerful Shelby GT500.
After posting a Ford-made video of a 2013 GT500 running around the 'Ring, the guys over at SVTPerformance.com (an enthusiasts forum not affiliated with Ford or SVT) wanted more answers. They got in touch with Ford's Global Performance Vehicle Chief Engineer Jamal Hameedi, who said until there is a way to verify the times and inspect the cars, Ford will not get involved with lap-time wars. In the email, Hameedi pointed out that the 'Ring is a useful tool in that it allows a wide spectrum of track conditions, but until there is a governed way to record times, there is no way to accurately compare cars head-to-head.
And as much as some may not like it, Hameedi speaks the truth. It really isn't possible to compare times from one car to another, unless those cars were lapping the same track at the same time with the same driver. Not that any of this means there won't be continuous wars by fans and manufacturers alike... in other words, feel free to voice your opinions in the Comments below.
We compare 2021 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport specifications to their ritzy Land Rover competiton
Tue, Jul 14 2020The 2021 Bronco and Bronco Sport are the spearheads for Ford's new 4x4 sub-brand, with the former taking the fight directly to the Jeep Wrangler and the latter providing Ford with a more rugged alternative to the Escape. We've already looked at how the new Bronco and Bronco Sport compare to their mainstream competition, but we'd like to see how the Bronco stacks up to another hotly anticipated returning nameplate: the Land Rover Defender. Not to leave its little sibling in the cold, I decided to browse Land Rover's lineup and see what might be a suitable counterpoint to the Bronco Sport. For better or worse, I found an almost-perfect fit in the Range Rover Evoque. So, how do these new American 4x4s compare to the Old Country's more-expensive alternatives? Let's dig in, starting with the big boys. As you might expect from the Bronco's robust credentials, it holds its own here against the more-expensive Brit. The Defender's higher price point brings along a good bit of power advantage with both engines, but that's to be expected. The Defender also has that trick adjustable-height suspension that the Bronco lacks, giving it an edge in practicality, and it can also tow quite a bit more. On the flip side, there are quite a few advantages to going with the Ford, including a greater number of choices in terms of powertrain. The available manual transmission on four-cylinder Broncos is a nice bonus, for instance, as is the option of getting either the base 2.3-liter or the optional 2.7-liter engine with either wheelbase. The Defender is a bit more restrictive in this regard offering only the inline-six on the short-wheelbase model. As an added bonus, the Bronco is a convertible. That may not necessarily be a "plus" for all shoppers, but it's certainly an added bit of versatility (and potential appeal) the Defender lacks. And of course, the Bronco can be had for as little as $30,000, whereas the Land Rover starts at $50,000. Now, on to the less-rugged siblings. The specs here are actually a little tighter in most respects, but the powertrain story is almost identical. The Evoque checks in where the Bronco Sport tops out, and the Range Rover gets an optional high-output variant of the 2.0-liter turbocharged four.