1964 Ford F-100 Short Bed ! Beautiful Solid Truck ! Drive It Home ! on 2040-cars
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck SHORT BED
Engine:68 COMET 289
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-100
Trim: SHORT BED
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 68 Comet 2-Speed Automatic
Options: CD Player
Mileage: 70,000
Sub Model: F-100
Exterior Color: White
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Black & White
Number of Doors: 2
1964 FORD F-100 Pick Up truck ! Real head turner ! Solid , no hidden rust . Underneath and frame has been undercoated. Runs great ! DRIVE IT HOME ! This truck is by no means perfect. Steering has a little play. Needs some minor body work and a nice paint job to make it a real quality shower ! The bed has been aluminum diamond plated , not because of rust , but at one time it was used to haul firewood and there was no way to remove the dents from the bed, so diamond plate was a nice way to go . Has a 68 Comet 289 V-8 with 302 heads , and 68 Comet 2 speed transmission ! Headers and dual exhaust. Tires have excellent tread left , maybe a few thousand miles on them if that. Everything works as far as lights , heater , wipers , signals , and all that. Starts right up and idles , no smoke , no hesitation , and runs up good ! I have had this truck for going on 4 years now and today was the 3rd time I have driven it down the road. I just don't Have the time for it anymore. The previous owner had it for 19 years ! I suggest a pre inspection before you buy, I would never buy with out one myself ! Selling AS-IS with no warranty's or returns. I live in Beavercreek , Ohio wich is just east of Dayton a few miles.Thank's for looking at my truck . Rick 937-470-0474 Cell # anytime.
Ford F-100 for Sale
Auto Services in Ohio
World Auto Parts ★★★★★
West Park Shell Auto Care ★★★★★
Waterloo Transmission ★★★★★
Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★
Transmission Engine Pros ★★★★★
Total Auto Glass ★★★★★
Auto blog
Project Ugly Horse alive and kicking at Road & Track
Thu, 29 Aug 2013The hallways of the Autoblog campus are much quieter now that Zach Bowman has taken his prose, along with his welders, wrenches and hammers, over to the digital pages of Road & Track, but that doesn't mean our favorite project Mustang is gone forever. Project Ugly Horse is still coming along, and Zach has gifted us another update on his unfoxy Fox Body.
Last we saw of the Ugly Horse, Zach was strengthening up the '89 Mustang's chassis as he prepares to stuff the turbocharged, direct-injected EcoBoost engine of a Ford Focus ST under the hood. First things first, the old mill must go. Head on over to Road & Track to catch the latest chapter of Project Ugly Horse.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #319 LIVE!
Mon, 04 Feb 2013We record Autoblog Podcast #319 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #319
Jeep checks out the Grand Wagoneer at Wagonmaster
Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy
Thu, Jan 8 2015With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.