Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1956 Ford F100 Pickup Red 428 Not F1 on 2040-cars

US $12,900.00
Year:1956 Mileage:156000
Location:

Lockwood, Missouri, United States

Lockwood, Missouri, United States
Advertising:

You are bidding on a nice 1956 Ford F100 pickup. It is red with a 428? motor, so I have been told, I'm not a motor expert. I will say it does have alot of power. It is automatic but no pwer steering or power breaks, but them seems to work almost as easy as the ones with power. The heater, windshield wipers and lights work. The dash gages do not work but a more modern temp, oil and rpm gage has been added that does work. It has new tires with moon shaped ford hubcaps. The bed is metal and solid. The truck comes with dust truck tarp cover. This is a pickup item and cash  or paypal only. Email me for questions.

Auto Services in Missouri

Wicked Stickers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Industrial Equipment & Supplies
Address: 2115 Parkway Dr Ste A, Old-Monroe
Phone: (636) 441-8468

Vietti Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 601 E Mount Vernon St, Nixa
Phone: (417) 725-8100

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 3896 Vogel Rd, Arnold
Phone: (636) 282-0418

Team 1 Auto Body & Glass ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windshield Repair
Address: 7300 Watson Rd, Creve-Coeur
Phone: (314) 962-0050

Talley`s Collision Repair Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Painting & Lettering
Address: 410 SE Douglas St, Austin
Phone: (816) 293-2773

Tallant`s Auto Body & Hot Rod Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 1777 Iron Street, Gladstone
Phone: (816) 931-5100

Auto blog

New UAW boss Williams talks tough, vows 'no more concessions'

Sun, 08 Jun 2014

Dennis Williams, the newly elected president of the UAW, had some tough words for American automakers in his inauguration speech at the 2014 UAW Convention, striking down the possibility of any additional concessions from the 400,000-strong union.
"No more concessions. We are tired of it. Enough is enough," Williams said during his speech. UAW employees have not received a raise in nearly 10 years, according to Reuters.
Considering the recent strong results for Ford, Chrysler and General Motors, the union's demands are likely to carry a bit more weight in next year's negotiations. And considering Williams' tough stance, we could be in for some fireworks once negotiations commence.

Ford to build next F-150, outgoing model concurrently?

Wed, 24 Jul 2013

Ford is rumored to be considering concurrent production for old and new F-150 models in a bid to minimize supply chain disruptions and inventory. Automotive News is reporting that the Blue Oval will build both the current F-150 and its replacement, which we showed you testing just last month, side by side for about half a year before switching over entirely to next-generation production.
As IHS Automotive analyst Mike Jackson told AN, "In order to ramp up, you have to retool...and that means you have to take capacity offline." Building both models alongside could allow Ford to cope with the still strong demand for the current F-150, while populating dealer supplies and working out supply chain kinks for the new model before making a full-time switch.
A loss of capacity when demand is so strong, even for a short period, could spell bad news for Ford, which nets an estimated 90 percent of its global profit on pickups and large SUVs. As AN states, Ford produces the F-150 in both Kansas City, Missouri and Dearborn, Michigan, which allows it to maintain some degree of flexibility in production. The new F-150 is expected to arrive at the 2014 North American International Auto Show as a 2015 model, with a design inspired by the Atlas Concept first shown at the Detroit Auto Show last January.

Is it time for American carmakers to give up on dual-clutch transmissions? [w/poll]

Mon, 22 Jul 2013

Last week, in the midst of Detroit's first days seeking relief in Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, Automotive News contributor Larry P. Vellequette penned an editorial suggesting that American car companies raise the white flag on dual clutch transmissions and give up on trying to persuade Americans to buy cars fitted with them. Why? Because, Vellequette says, like CVT transmissions, they "just don't sound right or feel right to American drivers." (Note: In the article, it's not clear if Vellequette is arguing against wet-clutch and dry-clutch DCTs or just dry-clutch DCTs, which is what Ford and Chrysler use.) The article goes on to state that Ford and Chrysler have experimented with DCTs and that both consumers and the automotive press haven't exactly given them glowing reviews, despite their quicker shifts and increased fuel efficiency potential compared to torque-converter automatic transmissions.
Autoblog staffers who weighed in on the relevance of DCTs in American cars generally disagreed with the blanket nature of Vellequette's statement that they don't sound or feel right, but admit that their lack of refinement compared to traditional automatics can be an issue for consumers. That's particularly true in workaday cars like the Ford Focus and Dodge Dart, both of which have come in for criticism in reviews and owner surveys. From where we sit, the higher-performance orientation of such transmissions doesn't always meld as well with the marching orders of everyday commuters (particularly if drivers haven't been educated as to the transmission's benefits and tradeoffs), and in models not fitted with paddle shifters, it's particularly hard for drivers to use a DCT to its best advantage.
Finally, we also note that DCT tuning is very much an evolving science. For instance, Autoblog editors who objected to dual-clutch tuning in the Dart have more recently found the technology agreeable in the Fiat 500L. Practice makes perfect - or at least more acceptable.