Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Ford Explorer Xlt, 4x4, Navigation, Low Reserve on 2040-cars

Year:2011 Mileage:67000 Color: Black /
 Black
Location:

Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States

Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States
Engine:3.5L 3496CC 213Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: 1FMHK8D84BGA66309 Year: 2011
Mileage: 67,000
Make: Ford
Sub Model: XLT
Model: Explorer
Exterior Color: Black
Trim: XLT Sport Utility 4-Door
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Cylinders: 6
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

We are proud to offer a beautiful 2011 Ford Explorer XLT 4x4.  It is very well equiped with 3rd row, tow package, Nav, Micosoft sync, sirius radio, 4x4, and much more.  This SUV is perfect in everyway and has no issues what so ever.  We had it auction certified when we bought the vehicle and it was rated at perfect by Manhiem auto auction.  We are selling this way below the book value so bid to win and please don't bid if you don't intend to pay.  We will be glad to show the vehicle at anytime just call or text 270-799-1262. 

Auto Services in Kentucky

Taylor`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Fiberglass Fabricators
Address: 321 SE 8th St, Baskett
Phone: (812) 424-0221

Simpsionville Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 6986 Shelbyville Rd, Simpsonville
Phone: (502) 257-8631

Saratoga Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 414 S Main St, Williamstown
Phone: (859) 823-2211

River City Auto Center Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1800 Brownsboro Rd, Louisville
Phone: (502) 409-9030

Quest Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 824 Bypass Rd, Winchester
Phone: (859) 355-5060

Portland Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: Oakland
Phone: (270) 586-6364

Auto blog

Uber hopes facilities in Detroit will help shape its autonomous future

Mon, Sep 19 2016

Hot off the heels of unleashing its fleet of self-driving vehicles in Pittsburgh, PA, Uber announced plans to open a new facility in the Detroit, MI area, reports Automotive News. The new facility was announced at an event hosted by Society of Automotive Engineers in Detroit, MI. Uber's vice president of global vehicle programs Sherif Marakby revealed the news, reports Automotive News. The facility is meant to help the ride-sharing company collaborate with suppliers and automakers in the area. There's no word on where Uber will build the new facility or how big it will be, as those factors have yet to be determined. Just like Pittsburgh, PA, Detroit, MI could become another testing ground for the ride-sharing company. The latest move to open a facility in the Detroit area comes after Uber offered users in Pittsburgh the chance to ride in one of its autonomous vehicle as it looks to gain vital real-world testing. Uber is utilizing a fleet of modified Ford Fusions. Earlier this year in April, the automaker announced a partnership with Google, Lyft, Uber, and Volvo to develop autonomous cars. A new facility in Detroit would strengthen the partnership and help Uber, as well as Ford put autonomous vehicles on the road faster. Related Video: News Source: Automotive News - sub. req.Image Credit: AOL Green Ford Volvo Transportation Alternatives Technology Emerging Technologies Autonomous Vehicles Detroit Uber taxi Lyft ridesharing facility

Consumer Reports explains its disdain for infotainment

Thu, 20 Mar 2014

One of the perks of reviewing all manner of cars and trucks is that we're exposed to all the different infotainment systems. Whether Cadillac's CUE, Chrysler's UConnect, BMW's iDrive or MyFord Touch, we sample each and every infotainment system on the market.
Not surprisingly, some are better than others. It seems consumers have come to a similar consensus, with Consumer Reports claiming that Ford and Lincoln, Cadillac and Honda offer the worst user infotainment experiences. Not surprisingly, you won't find much argument among the Autoblog staff.
Take a look below to see just what it is about the latest batch of infotainment systems that grinds CR's gears. After that, scroll down into Comments and let us know if you agree with the mag's views.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.