2001 Ford Explorer Xls Sport Utility 4-door 4.0l on 2040-cars
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
2001 Ford Explorer XLS Sport Utility 4-Door 4.0L:
A Blue Ford Explorer in a good condition is ready for a new owner. We bought it because it gave us a safe feeling driving in this car and especially a comfortable one as well. The Ford has new tires and topped off fluids since its last pass by the maintenance. It has a good CD player and working radio. This car has done around 131000 miles. We are non-smokers so the cars interior is undamaged by smoke. The car was pre-owned by someone else before we bought it from the dealership. We provide a CARFAX document with it so we can provide you with all the necessary documents of the car. We would love to give you a test ride around the lot so you can experience the feel of the car and its condition. Please contact us so we can arrange our time Payment can be cash, check, electronically or even via the bank. |
Ford Explorer for Sale
- 2014 ford explorer sport*nav*roof*rear dvd*heated/cooled*ecoboost*like new*(US $43,995.00)
- 2011 ford explorer limited fwd silver w/black interior, 3.5l v6 6 speed auto(US $27,799.00)
- Suv 3.5l third row seat cd front wheel drive power steering steel wheels
- 1992 ford explorer eddie bauer sport utility 4-door 4.0l
- 2000 ford explorer xls 4-door 4.0l
- 2004 ford explorer eddie bauer sport utility 4-door 4.6l
Auto Services in Arizona
Windshield Replacement Phoenix ★★★★★
Valley Express Auto Repair ★★★★★
Tj`s Speedometer Repair ★★★★★
Super Discount Transmissions ★★★★★
Sun Devil Auto ★★★★★
Storm Auto Glass ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM also sheds parts from its pickups to boost payload ratings
Thu, 31 Jul 2014The row between Ford and Ram over who boasts the best-in-class tow rating for heavy duty pickups has revealed a number of things. Chief among them is a report that Ford removes items like the spare tire, jack, radio and center console from its vehicles in a bid to lower its base curb weight and therefore keep the truck's gross vehicle weight rating down.
For those that need a refresher, GVWR is the vehicle's curb weight plus its maximum payload. A lower GVWR allows Ford to station its F-450 among the so-called Class III pickups, despite the fact that internally, it has the makings of a more brutish Class IV truck.
Ford explains away these deletions, saying a customer could order their vehicle in such a manner. It has also come to light that Ford is not the only automaker to engage in such practices.
Ford's Farley apologizes for saying Blue Oval tracks customers with GPS
Fri, 10 Jan 2014Ford marketing head honcho Jim Farley made waves at CES this week by telling show attendees, "We know everyone who breaks the law, we know when you're doing it." according to a report by Business Insider. Farley continued by saying, "We have GPS in your car, so we know what you're doing. By the way, we don't supply that data to anyone."
Farley has since amended his statement, saying that Ford dose not, in fact, track its customers in their cars "without their approval or consent."
Apparently carried away with a hypothetical notion, Farley was attempting to describe how Ford might be able to employee aggregated user data for things like accurate traffic reporting and pattern spotting. A Ford spokesperson confirmed with Business Insider that its GPS units are not sharing the whereabouts of drivers, though there are a few on-board services that might do so. After opting in to the services (and presumably being made aware of any/all tracking and data collection), Ford's Sync Services Directions and Crew Chief software do, in fact, allow data collection as a means of improving both systems. Farley added that the opt-in data is not shared, even when being tracked.
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.