1996 Ford Explorer Xlt Sport Utility 4-door 4.0l on 2040-cars
Mount Croghan, South Carolina, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Used
Year: 1996
Mileage: 220,000
Make: Ford
Sub Model: XLT
Model: Explorer
Exterior Color: Green
Trim: XLT Sport Utility 4-Door
Interior Color: Gray
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Cylinders: 6
Options: Sunroof, Leather Seats, CD Player, Originally it was a rear wheel drive, but now 4x4
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
So, up "FOR SALE" is a 1996 Ford Explorer XLT. Every thing is still factory inside except for the sound system! It has an aftermarket stereo, that is usb acceptable, also can install a memory card into it, along with being a cd player too! It also has a 1600 watt class d competition Crunch amp, along with 2 individual bass boxes, 1 box faces the back seats with (2) 12" MTX bass speakers, the other bass box is plexiglass & it faces the back along with (2) 12" Audio Bond bass speakers in it. The way I usually play it, people usually hear me way before they ever see me!! It has sunroof, thats fully functional, power everything, a/c, & heat work great too! Underneath the hood you will find the stock 4.0 V/6 engine, nothing has been changed or customized about the vehicle except for the chassis. This was also a 2 wheel drive Explorer, but as you can see now, its a fully functional 4x4 & yes it does work, tho since I have built it, I have run it in nothing but 2 low or 2 high, & have went anywhere I wanted too, but the 4x4 does work too, just never had to use it! The chassis the Explorer sits upon is an M37 chassis. It has a divorced NP200 transfer case that has the option of 2 high or 2 low or 4 high or 4 low. There is a seal in the case where the parking break was once at that is leaking, however I have all 4 seals to replace the old ones, just havent had the time to tear it down & install them, but the one that is primarily leaking could b fixed without the removal of any drive lines or divorce case, however, due to my physical condition, I am unable to get underneath it right now too! Its not very articulated, meaning it dont have a lot of flex to it, but it rides great, & pulls excellent, & also will stop on a dime! Its had all new brakes & wheel cylinders replaced, new drive lines that have been machined balanced, along with all new u-joints installed & have spare u-joints to go with it also, just in case one may ever go out! It stands upon 49" military tires, & the tires with rims weigh almost 400 pounds each, which I have bought some 24" aluminum rims to fit this, but havent gotten any tires, tho the rims will go along with the purchase too! This Explorer is barely in legal limits of S.C. law to operate on the highway! So yes, with insurance & a tag, you can have a street MONSTER! I have drove it all the way to Monroe, N.C. & back home without any problems at all, however, due to no steering stabilizers, & by the speedometer, you can only drive it at around 40 mph, anything over that, it will get a death wobble, which can b corrected with dual steering stabilizers! I also have clean clear title in hand!! The frame really needs to b sand blasted & painted, & the left side front fender has a boo boo where the tire caught it from turning to deep, but no biggie, easy fix & needs to b trimmed out some what!
|
Ford Explorer for Sale
- 2006 ford explorer xlt sport utility 4-door 4.0l(US $9,750.00)
- 1996 ford explorer v8 awd eddie bauer ** custom explorer **(US $4,500.00)
- Warranty 1 owner limited 4x4 nav 3rd row sync htd lthr sts boards we finance(US $23,900.00)
- 1997 ford explorer xlt sport utility 4-door 5.0l
- 2013 ford explorer fwd 4dr xlt
- 1999 ford explorer(US $2,200.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
Yellow Cab ★★★★★
Viking Imports Foreign Car Parts & Accessories Inc ★★★★★
Troy Gardner`s Paint & Body ★★★★★
Sterling`s Detail ★★★★★
Spiveys Wrecker Service ★★★★★
Randy`s Garage & Alignment ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford posts decade-best $2.1B profit in Q1 2013
Wed, 24 Apr 2013As predicted, Ford has reported that its first quarter of 2013 was a resounding success overall, with a pretax profit of $2.1 billion ($0.41 per share), and a net income of $1.6 billion ($0.40 per share). In fact, Ford made a pretax profit of some $2.4 billion in its home North American market, with that total number being pulled down by losses in South America and Europe. That gaudy North American profit is the strongest result by the automaker since 2000.
Ford's companywide profit for Q1 was down $147 million from one year ago, while the net income number marked an increase of $215 million year over year. Overall, this is Ford's 15th-consecutive profitable quarter.
The bad news from the European market was even worst in Q1 2013 than it was last year. Pretax losses of $462 million - on revenue of $6.7 billion - represented a year-over-year change of -$313 million. In South American, the company reported a loss of $218 million, down from a slim profit of $54 million in Q1 2012. The news was better for Ford Asia Pacific Africa, where a $6 million pretax profit in 2013 showed a year-over-year gain of some $101 million when compared to losses in 2012. Scroll down to read Ford's full press release.
Is it time for American carmakers to give up on dual-clutch transmissions? [w/poll]
Mon, 22 Jul 2013Last week, in the midst of Detroit's first days seeking relief in Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, Automotive News contributor Larry P. Vellequette penned an editorial suggesting that American car companies raise the white flag on dual clutch transmissions and give up on trying to persuade Americans to buy cars fitted with them. Why? Because, Vellequette says, like CVT transmissions, they "just don't sound right or feel right to American drivers." (Note: In the article, it's not clear if Vellequette is arguing against wet-clutch and dry-clutch DCTs or just dry-clutch DCTs, which is what Ford and Chrysler use.) The article goes on to state that Ford and Chrysler have experimented with DCTs and that both consumers and the automotive press haven't exactly given them glowing reviews, despite their quicker shifts and increased fuel efficiency potential compared to torque-converter automatic transmissions.
Autoblog staffers who weighed in on the relevance of DCTs in American cars generally disagreed with the blanket nature of Vellequette's statement that they don't sound or feel right, but admit that their lack of refinement compared to traditional automatics can be an issue for consumers. That's particularly true in workaday cars like the Ford Focus and Dodge Dart, both of which have come in for criticism in reviews and owner surveys. From where we sit, the higher-performance orientation of such transmissions doesn't always meld as well with the marching orders of everyday commuters (particularly if drivers haven't been educated as to the transmission's benefits and tradeoffs), and in models not fitted with paddle shifters, it's particularly hard for drivers to use a DCT to its best advantage.
Finally, we also note that DCT tuning is very much an evolving science. For instance, Autoblog editors who objected to dual-clutch tuning in the Dart have more recently found the technology agreeable in the Fiat 500L. Practice makes perfect - or at least more acceptable.
2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid
Mon, 01 Apr 2013Your Mileage May Vary
As difficult as it is to write this, I was actually excited about the 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid. With the beautiful looks of the newest midsize fighter from Ford and a fuel economy estimate capable of shaming even the stalwart Camry Hybrid, the battery-augmented four-door seemed like a recipe for unabashed success. But appearances love nothing more than swapping our boundless enthusiasm for cold platters of disappointment. The 2013 Fusion Hybrid gets hobbled right out of the gate with a lofty price tag, and real-world driving keeps the sedan from even approaching those EPA figures.
With so many excellent midsize hybrids on the market, is there any reason to consider the newest Fusion Hybrid? Are sharp aesthetics, a well-executed interior and capable driving dynamics enough to overcome the machine's shortfalls? Not from where I'm standing.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.052 s, 7783 u