Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

03 Explorer Xlt V8 Rear A/c Third Seat No Reserve on 2040-cars

Year:2003 Mileage:145386 Color: Black /
 Tan
Location:

Troutman, North Carolina, United States

Troutman, North Carolina, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 1FMZU63W03UB44428 Year: 2003
Make: Ford
Warranty: No
Model: Explorer
Trim: XLT Sport Utility 4-Door
Doors: 4
Drive Type: RWD
Fuel: Gasoline
Mileage: 145,386
Drivetrain: RWD
Sub Model: XLT
Exterior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 8
Interior Color: Tan
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in North Carolina

Whitey`s German Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Machine Shops
Address: 6042 Asheville Hwy, Horseshoe
Phone: (828) 684-0684

Transmission Center ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1309 Cotton Grove Rd Ste D, Salisbury
Phone: (336) 249-8769

Tow-N-Go LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Roadside Service, Towing
Address: Proctorville
Phone: (910) 286-3745

Terry Labonte Chevrolet ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1401 Bridford Pkwy, High-Point
Phone: (888) 440-1432

Sun City Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Changing Equipment
Address: 409 Featherson Rd, Wesley-Chapel
Phone: (803) 548-3227

Show & Pro Paint & Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1779 Bingham Dr, Pope-Afb
Phone: (910) 423-2963

Auto blog

2015 Ford Mustang renders reveal look of the real thing

Tue, 15 Oct 2013

This is, according to the pony-car obsessed kids over at Mustang6G.com, the closest, most accurate rendering of the new, 2015 Ford Mustang to date. Artis Chazcron used a combination of Ford CAD images and information from assorted spy shots to assemble a fairly handsome car, albeit one that conforms to the tired cliché of being more evolutionary than revolutionary.
Now, it's very important to note that these are still speculative renders, and that they only represent the base car - that could explain the lack of the Mustang's vestigial side scoops, along with other, newer styling cues that Mustang6G seems to think will arrive on production models. Those items include a new, double-bubble roof, although the Mustang aficionados claim that even if it were present, it'd barely be visible from these angles.
The front end is pretty spot on, compared to what we've seen from earlier spy shots, while the tail, with its interesting light design is something new. The louvered taillights look quite different from the current version, obviously, though Mustang has gone the whimsical route with taillights before. Also, note the new rear diffuser uses an integrated reverse light and rear foglight, the latter of which is required for sale in Europe.

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study

Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age

Thu, 17 Jul 2014

In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.