Incredible condition.
Runs like a champ. Plenty of torque.
138XXX miles (very low for year)
Recent plugs and wires replacement.
Replaced IAC.
Transmission shifts are tight like trans is new, ZERO slip. Fluid is new. Plus B&M shift kit(not installed yet)
Cherry red paint, original with fresh clay bar and wax. Has defects but still in great condition!
Interior is a 9/10 due to some random holes, and groves in roof fabric.
The rest is in fantastic shape, no cracks in leather or plastic.
Driver side tint has damage but easy fix yourself or I can refer you to my tint guy for a very reasonably priced fix.
Driver window sticks sometimes but if purchase price is enough, i'll fix it.
Tires are in good shape. Front could use replacing within the next 3 or 4 oil changes.
Running boards included if wanted.
Lowered the front about an inch to level the explorer.
Rides really well. Shocks are in great condition.
Oil changes regularly since purchase from an older couple in Laguna Woods.
Will pass smog with flying colors and clear title in my name, current tags.
Any questions please ask.
Price somewhat negotiable.
NO LOWBALL OFFERS!
Thank you for looking.
I reserve right to end auction whenever, vehicle for sale locally.
|
Ford Explorer Sport for Sale
- Awd navigation reverse cam heated leather non smoker clean carfax we finance(US $39,900.00)
- Sport loaded suv 3.5l 4x4 awd ecoboost twin turbo nav sun roof tow package(US $40,700.00)
- 2005 ford explorer xls sport utility 4-door 4.0l
- 2002 ford explorer sport
- 2005 ford explorer xls sport utility 4-door 4.0l
- 02 ford explorer sport-83k-pwr sunroof-am/fm stereo-running boards-alloy wheels(US $4,595.00)
Auto blog
Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?
Sat, Sep 23 2017If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd
2013 Ford Mustang V6
Mon, 10 Jun 2013Secretary Trim, Evolved
There was a time not so long ago when opting for a base Ford Mustang meant getting little more than some sheetmetal, an anemic four-cylinder engine and what may very well have been the world's most disappointing automatic transmission. During the Fox Body years, Ford seemed hell-bent on living up to Carroll Shelby's derogatory description of the coupe as little more than a runabout for demure office assistants, and the result was a base model with fewer sporting intentions than a Dilbert day calendar.
Some 20 years later, hopping behind the wheel of an entry-level pony is an entirely different experience. With all of the menacing aesthetics of the brawnier GT, a well-equipped interior and a drivetrain that toes the line between efficiency and power better than few before it, the 2013 Ford Mustang V6 is an attractive option for buyers in the big coupe market. But is it attractive enough to forgo the beastly GT?
Preserving automotive history costs big bucks
Wed, 29 Jan 2014
$1.8 million is spent each year to maintain GM's fleet of 600 production and concept cars.
When at least two of the Detroit Three were on the verge of death a few years back, one of the tough questions that was asked of Ford, General Motors and Chrysler execs - outside of why execs were still taking private planes to meetings - was why each company maintained huge archives of old production and concept vehicles. GM, for example, had an 1,100-vehicle collection when talk of a federal bailout began.