Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2003 Ford Explorer Xls on 2040-cars

Year:2003 Mileage:0
Location:

117 Midtown Ave, Mt Hope, West Virginia, United States

117 Midtown Ave, Mt Hope, West Virginia, United States
Fuel Type:E-85/Gasoline
Engine:4.0L V6 12V MPFI SOHC Flexible Fuel
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FMZU72K13UA74863
Stock Num: K049C
Make: Ford
Model: Explorer XLS
Year: 2003
Options:
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Black grille
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Cargo tie downs
  • Cassette player with auto-reverse
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Curb weight: 4,374 lbs.
  • Door po
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Dual vanity mirrors
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Four-wheel Independent Suspension
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Head Room: 39.9"
  • Front Hip Room: 55.0"
  • Front Leg Room: 43.9"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 59.1"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 22.5 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 15 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 21 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Flexible
  • Gross vehicle weight: 5,420 lbs.
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Independent rear suspension
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Max cargo capacity: 88 cu.ft.
  • Overall height: 71.4"
  • Overall Length: 189.5"
  • Overall Width: 72.1"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Plastic/vinyl steering wheel trim
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power steering
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Deep
  • Rear bench
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear Head Room: 38.9"
  • Rear Hip Room: 54.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 37.2"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 58.9"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote power door locks
  • Roof rails
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Short and long arm rear suspension
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Trailer hitch
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV
  • Wheel Diameter: 16
  • Wheel Width: 7
  • Wheelbase: 113.8"
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors

To receive special Internet pricing you must ask for Shawn Pino when contacting the Dealership.Print this Ad and receive $100 Cash! when you purchase a used vehicle!

Auto Services in West Virginia

Steve`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: BOTTLE Plant Rd, Camden-On-Gauley
Phone: (304) 742-8800

Speedy Lube ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair
Address: 1148 Cedar Valley Dr, Berwind
Phone: (276) 963-0078

Southern Frederick Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 153 Ryco Ln, Ridgeway
Phone: (540) 665-0278

South Park Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 429 Brockway avenue, Dellslow
Phone: (304) 292-2620

South Branch Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 502 Clements St, Moorefield
Phone: (304) 538-2042

Rex`s Transmission Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1420 Township Road 428, Weirton
Phone: (740) 537-4535

Auto blog

2016 Ford Focus RS mule spotted on US soil

Tue, 17 Jun 2014

Okay Ford, this is what we like to see. One of our intrepid spy photographers has captured a vehicle that we weren't even sure would see the light of day - the next Focus RS. While this is pretty clearly a mule based on the current Focus ST, as our spy points out, there are a number of giveaways about this hot hatch's true nature.
Indication number one that all is not right with this Focus is the heavily camo'd front fascia, which has been completely reconfigured for duty on the RS. It boasts significantly larger grilles that are meant to accommodate what is likely the 2.3-liter, turbocharged four-cylinder that's destined for the 2015 Ford Mustang. Considering that, then, we can expect around 300 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque from the hottest of Foci, although it's entirely possible that the production model could climb even higher, to around 330 hp.
The front fascia tweaks are complemented in the back by a modified rear bumper, which fails at hiding a pair of exhaust tips quite unlike the standard Focus ST's center-exit exhaust. Other obvious changes include the wheel/tire/brake package on this particular car. Larger 19-inch wheels are shod in super-sticky Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires in 235/35/19 while the brakes feature what we think are four-piston calipers, possibly from Brembo, up front.

Ford Green Zone works magic with GPS to make your drive smarter, cleaner

Fri, Aug 29 2014

For the most part, plug-in hybrids rely on the power stored in the battery until that charge is depleted. Unless the switch can be changed manually, it's only then that the cars fire up the internal combustion engine and begin using the fossil fuels on board. This is ideal, of course, when one's drive isn't long enough that the car needs to start sipping gasoline at all. On longer commutes, when it's certain that the route is longer than the car's all-electric range, this isn't necessarily the most efficient use of energy. Ford's Green Zone system is designed to save some of that juice for the parts of the drive that require slower speeds. Ford is working on a smart system, based on Nokia mapping technology, that uses GPS data to use both the electricity and conventional fuel more efficiently. Since battery power is less efficient at highway speeds, Ford's Green Zone system is designed to save some of that juice for the parts of the drive that require slower speeds, rather than just using up all the electrons right at the beginning of the drive. Using a website or the in-car navigation system, the driver can pinpoint the parts of the route, highlighted in green, where using battery power would be more effective, and set the car to automatically switch to electricity for those sections. Depending on the route, the car could automatically switch back and forth between the two power sources multiple times, particularly if the drive is a mix between city and highway driving. Of course, Green Zone will be go beyond that. The program is being developed to take traffic and road grade into account, details that allow the car to be make even smarter choices to improve efficiency. Ford even hopes to have Green Zone learn driver habits, and respond accordingly depending on who is driving the car. The system could control other features as well, such as anticipating corners and shifting the headlights to better illuminate the road ahead. Green Zone could also potentially use information from vehicle-to-vehicle networking to control functions in the car. The Green Zone system still has a few years before it will be ready to be put into production vehicles, but Ford is confident it will make its way onto the road eventually. As with other innovations that improve efficiency and make our vehicles smarter, we can expect to see similar technology from other manufacturers, until it becomes a regular part of driving in the future.

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.