2003 Ford Excursion Limited Sport Utility 4-door 7.3l on 2040-cars
Fredericksburg, Texas, United States
THIS TRUCK IS EXCEPTIONALLY CLEAN DUE TO BEING OWNED BY A 67 YEAR OLD MAN. THE INTERIOR IS SUPER CLEAN AS IN PICTURES. THE OUTSIDE PAINT IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION WITH A GREAT SHINE. THE VEHICLE HAS BEEN UPDATED WITH NAVIGATION AND A HANDSFREE BLUETOOTH PHONE SYSTEM. HEATED SEATS IN FRONT SEATS. REAR DVD ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEM. THIRD ROW SEATING. FULL SIZE SPARE TIRE. tIRES ON VEHICLE HAVE 5000 MILES ON THEM. JUST PAID 1000.00 FOR THESE TIRES. REAR AIR CONDITIONING CONTROLS. COLD A/C!!!! RUNNING BOARDS WITH LIGHTS. THIS VEHICLE IS SUPER CLEAN AND RUNS EXCELLENT. THE ENGINE .TRANSMISSION AND ALL DIFFERENTIALS ARE ALL DRY. WONT FIND A BETTER ONE OUT THERE!!! |
Ford Excursion for Sale
- 2000 ford excursion 200” white super stretch limo limousine 20 passenger(US $13,000.00)
- 2000 ford excursion limited sport utility 4-door 7.3l
- 01_excursion_7.3l diesel_4x4_limited_bench_3rd row_custom_tx(US $17,498.00)
- 2000 ford excursion xlt sport utility 4-door 6.8l 110k great family vehicle!!!(US $8,900.00)
- 2005 ford excursion suv limited 6.8l v10 gasoline 4x4 third row tv/dvd rust free(US $15,900.00)
- 2001-only 66,000 miles! cost new was $230,000! you gotta see it! $99 no reserve!
Auto Services in Texas
Zepco ★★★★★
Xtreme Motor Cars ★★★★★
Worthingtons Divine Auto ★★★★★
Worthington Divine Auto ★★★★★
Wills Point Automotive ★★★★★
Weaver Bros. Motor Co ★★★★★
Auto blog
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
Ford Q1 profits dragged down by warranty costs
Fri, 25 Apr 2014General Motors isn't the only Detroit automaker posting falling profits in the first quarter. Ford just released its Q1 2014 financial data, and it reported a net income of $989 million, down $622 million from Q1 2013. The drop is partially blamed on higher warranty and recall expenses than the company had anticipated.
Financially, Ford suffered a rough quarter almost across the board. Its pre-tax profit of $1.4 billion was also down $765 million from a year ago. Things were even worse in the North American market where operating profit fell significantly to $1.5 billion, down from $2.392 billion in Q1 2013. However, its global revenue ticked up slightly to $35.9 billion, from $35.6 billion in this period in 2013.
Ford admitted that it spent about $900 million on expenses that it hadn't planned for during this quarter. According to Reuters, the company paid about $400 million in additional warranty and recall costs in North America. The automaker didn't explain why the costs were so much higher than expected. However, in the last three months, Ford has had several recalls, including on the 2001-2004 Escape for rust, Explorer for its steering, Edge for its fuel line and others.
Ford Fusion and Fusion Hybrid nab five-star ratings from NHTSA
Thu, 24 Jan 2013Ford's Fusion and Fusion Hybrid have both received the highest five-star overall safety rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The rating is a big upgrade for the Fusion, which was completely redesigned for 2013. The previous model fell one star short of the top rating, after scoring only three stars in the frontal crash test and four stars in the side crash test and rollover evaluations. The 2013 Fusion received four stars in side crash and rollover testing and a full five stars in the front crash test.
Test results for the 2013 Fusion and Fusion Hybrid were greatly improved at least in part due to Ford's Personal Safety System. The system utilizes smarter sensors to gather crash data and tailor the car's restraint systems to the occupants. Seatbelt usage and seat position are taken into account to ensure airbags deploy with less pressure for smaller drivers, more for larger drivers.
The 2013 Fusion twins also received the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Top Safety Pick+ designation. Read the official press release below.