2001 Ford Excursion Limited on 2040-cars
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
For further questions email me : gauthiercampanelli@yahoo.com
2001 Ford Excursion Limited Edition.Good condition truck, runs and drives isreally good and strong, with low actual only 137kmiles on it. All power: PDL,PW, PCL, HS, 2WD, 4WD high & low, leather, alarm, rear park sensors. Truckrolling on M+S 305/50R20 chrome rims with about 80% tread left of Good Yeartires on it, good for another at least 2 seasons (Originally paid $2600 for therims and tires). 10v engine works really quite like new, almost can't hearthe engine how it works when it's on, transmission works really smooth too.I didn't drive much this Truck in snow, but it's really really good init. No warning lights or mechanical problems (will pass a State inspection).Extra upgrades and work been done to the vehicle: new battery, new manifoldseals on both sides, roof racks, new truck floor mats set and seat covers. LEDHalo Projector Angel Eyes Headlights, Excursion Black Tail Lights, Nitro Chip, 2screens 9' DVDs, engine oil just being changed with new oil and airfilters. These trucks are getting harder and harder to find this days, trucklooks really great and aggressive, has a lot of people attention andcompliments. 1 OF THIS TRUCKS JUST BEEN SOLD FOR OVER $18000 ( see last pic, wasmade here on eBay) Vehicle is to be sold as is. Clean Title on hands and ready.Buyer is responsible for any shipping arrangements. Deposit is not refundable.As extra bonus I will include Nitro Chip with a truck (which gives extra horsesand gives more mpg), also you will get original set of rims and tires with atleast 2-3 like new tires on it, 2 other good as well, only 1 bad tire in the 2NDfactory tires set.
Ford Excursion for Sale
2004 ford excursion 4x4 diesel 6.0 limited and loa(US $2,600.00)
2002 ford excursion 7.3l diesel - leather ~ lifted(US $2,600.00)
2005 ford excursion(US $10,400.00)
2005 ford excursion(US $11,100.00)
2002 ford excursion(US $11,800.00)
2005 ford excursion limited(US $7,700.00)
Auto Services in Massachusetts
Wu Auto Repair ★★★★★
Whitehead Motors ★★★★★
Westgate Tire & Auto Center ★★★★★
USA Speedy Quik Lube Tire and Auto Center ★★★★★
Ted`s Transmissions ★★★★★
Standard Auto Wrecking ★★★★★
Auto blog
Porsche, Jaguar continue dominance in 2015 JD Power APEAL study
Wed, Jul 22 2015The top of JD Power's 2015 APEAL Study has not changed much in the last year. Porsche remains No. 1 with Jaguar nipping at its heels, although both premium brands saw their overall score fall compared to 2014. For those that need a refresher, the APEAL Study looks at how "gratifying" a vehicle is to own and drive, rating cars and brands on a 1,000-point scale. The industry average for 2015 has increased from 794 to 798, while the total number of automakers that finished above the curve increased from 16 to 20. While Porsche and Jaguar finished at the top, their scores dropped eight and seven points, respectively, to 874 and 855. The top "non-premium" brand was Mini, which scored an impressive 825, up from 795. If the BMW-owned British marque is still a bit too premium for your tastes, last year's non-premium winner, Hyundai, did climb five points and is this year's runner up. At the opposite end of the scale, Smart sits at the very bottom of the rankings, with a score of 683 (it didn't appear on the 2014 rankings). Fiat also dropped, from fourth worst in 2014 to second worst in 2015, despite the 500 being named most appealing city car. Subaru made an impressive climb, from third worst to seventh, falling just 10 points shy of the industry average and two points south of the non-premium average. In the individual vehicle segments, eight brands earned multiple awards, with Ford, Chevrolet, and Porsche earning three apiece. Surprise segment victories included the new Ford Expedition, which beat out Chevy's popular Suburban. The Infiniti QX80 bested the likes of the Cadillac Escalade and Range Rover for best large luxury SUV, and the Dodge Challenger beat its muscle car rivals from Ford and Chevy. Most of the victories, though, were quite predictable. The Mazda6 and CX-5 took wins for the midsize sedan and compact SUV categories respectively, while the Volkswagen Golf captured the compact car win. The Ford F-150 won the large pickup category, while the Porsche Cayman was named most appealing compact premium sporty car. Check out the official release on the 2015 APEAL Study, available below, from JD Power. 2015 U.S. APEAL Study Results The latest safety-related technologies are among the drivers of customer satisfaction with new vehicles, according to the J.D. Power 2015 U.S.
Ford, GM to collaborate on 9- and 10-speed transmissions
Mon, 15 Apr 2013Back in October, there were reports that General Motors and Ford Motor Company were hard at work co-developing new nine- and ten-speed automatic transmissions, and now both automakers have confirmed this joint operation. While there are no specific vehicles mentioned to receive either transmission, a collaborative press release issued by GM and Ford mention that the transmission will be designed for front- and rear-wheel-drive cars, crossovers, trucks and SUVs.
These aren't the first powertrain components developed jointly between these cross-town rivals, either. The six-speed automatic currently used in vehicles like the Ford Edge, Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Cruze and Chevrolet Equinox was engineered in a similar fashion. As is the case with this existing transmission, both automakers will assist in the design, development and testing of the new transmissions, but each will build its own units in its own factories. Scroll down for the official press release.
2020 Ford Escape hybrids vs other crossover fuel sippers: How they compare on paper
Wed, Apr 3 2019Along with a new generation of Escape, Ford also reintroduced the world to the 2020 Ford Escape Hybrid. And if that weren't enough, Ford is adding a plug-in hybrid version. This is a sign of the times: people are more crossover crazy than ever, but are also seeking ways to use less fuel, whether it's for environmental or purely money-motivated reasons. The Ford hybrids aren't the only fuel-efficient compact crossovers on the market. They will be going head-to-head with conventional hybrids including the 2019 Kia Niro, 2019 Nissan Rogue Hybrid and 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. There are other plug-in hybrids including the 2019 Subaru Crosstrek PHEV, 2019 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and the plug-in version of the 2019 Kia Niro. There are even a couple diesels in the form of the 2019 Chevy Equinox and 2019 GMC Terrain. So we've rounded up the details on all these crossovers to see who leads and lags in criteria such as power, fuel efficiency, space and price. Check out all their details below. 2019 Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid View 68 Photos How do their engines and fuel economy compare? Conventional Hybrids and Diesels Let's face it, if you're buying one of these crossovers, one of the things that matters most to you is just how frugal with fuel they are. We'll start off with the conventional hybrids and diesels, and the clear victor is the Kia Niro, which in base FE trim, manages to hit 50 mpg combined. This is thanks to it sharing its powertrain with the Hyundai Ioniq, the Hyundai equivalent of the Toyota Prius. Buyers should take note that only the FE returns such high fuel economy. The LX and EX drop to 49 mpg, and the S Touring and Touring get 43. Even then, the least efficient Niro is the most efficient of the normal hybrids and diesels. It is nearly the least powerful, though, with 139 horsepower. Just behind it is the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. It delivers 40 mpg combined, and it has an ace up its sleeve: it comes standard with all-wheel drive. Every other vehicle in this powertrain group has front drive standard, and the Niro isn't available with all-wheel drive at all. If that weren't enough, the RAV4 Hybrid also boasts the most power at 219 horses. While we can't say anything about Escape Hybrid fuel economy, we do know that it will make 198 horsepower, which is close to the class-leading RAV4. The least powerful of these is the Equinox and Terrain, and they return the worst fuel economy at 32 mpg.