We Finance 06 Escape Xls Fwd Cd/mp3 Stereo Low Miles Keyless Entry 1 Owner 2.3l on 2040-cars
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:2.3L 140Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
Transmission:Automatic
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Make: Ford
Model: Escape
Trim: XLS Sport Utility 4-Door
Disability Equipped: No
Doors: 4
Drive Type: FWD
Drive Train: Front Wheel Drive
Mileage: 75,188
Inspection: Vehicle has been inspected
Sub Model: XLS FWD w/1
Exterior Color: Blue
Number of Cylinders: 4
Interior Color: Gray
Ford Escape for Sale
2001 ford escape xls 4x4 red red red
2004 ford escape limited sport utility 4-door 3.0l(US $6,995.00)
2005 ford escape hybrid(US $6,990.00)
2013 ford escape sel suv 2.0l turbocharged ecoboost certified pre owned(US $24,977.00)
2013 ford escape 4wd sel ecoboost leather loaded(US $26,523.00)
2001 ford escape with sunroof & leather
Auto Services in Ohio
Zink`s Body Shop ★★★★★
XTOWN PERFORMANCE ★★★★★
Wooster Auto Service ★★★★★
Walker Toyota Scion Mitsubishi Powersports ★★★★★
V&S Auto Service ★★★★★
True Quality Collision ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford jumps back in the water with marinized 6.2L V8
Wed, 06 Nov 2013Nameplates like the Mercury Mariner and Lincoln Navigator aside, Ford hasn't offered a marine engine in over two decades. But through a new partnership with one of the biggest names in the business, the Dearborn-based automaker is dipping its proverbial toes back in the water.
Announced yesterday at the SEMA Show in Las Vegas, the new partnership between Ford Component Sales and Indmar Marine Engines will see the 6.2-liter V8 from the F-150 SVT Raptor and F-Series Super Duty marinized for use in boats.
The largest privately owned inboard gasoline marine engine manufacturer in the world, Indmar has been in the business for 43 years, and figures the Ford V8 will be just what watersport enthusiasts are looking for to tow waterskiers and wakeboarders to their hearts' content.
Has the 2015 Ford Mustang gained hundreds of pounds?
Sun, 01 Jun 2014Automakers face competing interests when it comes to developing a new generation of vehicle. On the one hand, companies want to build their cars to be safer and better handling, with more equipment and maybe even larger dimensions over the model it's replacing. On the other hand, they strive to keep weight down to the benefit of both performance and fuel consumption. Usually something has to give, and in the case of the new 2015 Ford Mustang, those efforts may have resulted in a weight penalty of two or three hundred pounds.
This according to Blue Oval modifier Steeda Autosports, which states that "the 2015 Mustang ended up gaining 200-300 pounds in this remake". Despite the Mustang not being on the market yet, it would appear the leading Ford aftermarketer has been given early access to the 2015 model to help jumpstart its tuning efforts (a rather common development among trusted tuners). If Steeda's assertion is accurate, that would make the challenge of getting the new pony car up to speed for both Ford and aftermarket customizers like Steeda that much greater.
We're waiting for official word from Ford on the veracity of Steeda's claim, but if true, it's bound to be a bit of disappointing news for legions of Blue Oval performance enthusiasts. Watch this space for more.
Report: GM struggling to market turbo technology
Tue, 20 Apr 2010In the automotive realm, marketing can sometimes prove just as important as the actual product. Take, for instance, Ford's well regarded EcoBoost technology, which couples turbocharging with direct injection to produce more horsepower and reduce fuel consumption. Would it surprise you to hear that General Motors has had similar technology on the market for over three years?
It's true. GM's first turbocharged, direct injected powerplants hit the market for the 2007 model. The 2.0-liter Ecotec mills put down an impressive 260 horsepower and a matching 260 pound-feet of torque, and they were lauded by the press in the engine bays of the Pontiac Solstice, Saturn Sky, Chevrolet Cobalt SS and Chevrolet HHR SS. But few people outside a core group of enthusiasts actually remember this fact.
Says Uwe Grebe, executive director of GM's global advanced engineering, "We didn't have a badge and say, 'This is the most important thing we will put on all our brochures.'" Ford, however, did just that, and it's EcoBoost engines are right at the tips of all our tongues when we discuss today's most advanced powerplants. So, how does The General fix its mistake?