2006 Ford Escape Xlt on 2040-cars
4544 Kings Water Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Engine:3.0L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FMYU93166KB35539
Stock Num: PS73790
Make: Ford
Model: Escape XLT
Year: 2006
Exterior Color: Silver Clearcoat Metallic
Interior Color: Medium Dark Pebble
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 96248
Outdoor enthusiasts will love this spacious 2006 Ford Escape XLT, which provides more than enough room for all your hunting, fishing and camping equipment. It has a 3.00 liter 6 CYL. engine. This one's on the market for $10,988. With an unbeatable 5-star crash test rating, this SUV puts safety first. With anti-lock brakes, you can make safe emergency stops. According to a review from New Car Test Drive, All of the switchgear is easy to find and to use. Why not schedule your test drive today? FOR EVEN LOWER PRICE E-MAIL DEALER AND GET AN INSTANT RESPONSE & LINK TO MORE PHOTOS & DETAILS. ASK FOR THE SALES DEPARTMENT!
Ford Escape for Sale
- 2012 ford escape xlt(US $19,895.00)
- 2014 ford escape se(US $21,995.00)
- 2002 ford escape xlt(US $4,995.00)
- 2008 ford escape xlt
- 2008 ford escape limited(US $12,624.00)
- 2010 ford escape xlt(US $15,463.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
West Side Garage ★★★★★
Wally Armour Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram ★★★★★
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Tucker Bros Auto Wrecking Co ★★★★★
Tire Discounters Inc ★★★★★
Terry`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Jim Farley to lead Ford of Europe
Fri, 07 Nov 2014
"We are excited to see Jim and Stephen take on these new roles as they bring unique skills, experience and fresh perspectives to these critical positions." - Mark Fields
Ford marketing chief Jim Farley is taking over the company's troubled European operations as part of an executive shuffle confirmed on Friday morning.
Ford Fiesta ST in startling track battle against Toyota GT86
Wed, 26 Jun 2013On the surface, there's very little that the Ford Fiesta ST and Toyota GT86 (or the Scion FR-S that is sold in the US, or the largely similar Subaru BRZ) share in common. One is a hatchback with power coming from a turbocharged engine routed to the front wheels. The other is a coupe with power coming from a naturally aspirated four-cylinder boxer engine routed to the rear wheels.
Thing is, both of them are reasonably priced performance cars aimed at a similar segment of the automotive marketplace, so a comparison isn't out of the question. It is with all of this in mind that we direct you to the video below, in which the blokes from Evo pit the two manic little machines against one another on a race track. The result? Well, it can be summed up this way: Fast versus fun.
See how the track battle goes down in the video below.
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.