Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Quigley 4x4 Van on 2040-cars

Year:2002 Mileage:316000 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Barnegat, New Jersey, United States

Barnegat, New Jersey, United States
Advertising:
Engine:5.4
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:van
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: 1FTNE24L32HB29538 Year: 2002
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Make: Ford
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Model: E-Series Van
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: base
Number of Cylinders: 8
Drive Type: 4x4
Mileage: 316,000
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This is a 2002 Ford E250   that  has  a  2002  E350  one  ton   suspension  and   Quigley  4x4  running gear . The van has  a  5.4L Triton  V 8  that  was replaced with a new engine from FORD ( I have documentation for the engine replacement, cost almost  $8k  ) that now has 128k miles on it . New  front brakes, rotors, calipers , hoses and wheel bearings. . New rear brakes too. Van was just tuned up and oil changed  and runs and drives  beautifully. Four wheel drive system works perfectly and goes through snow or mud with ease.  Has remote  start system, power windows and  locks, cd  player, ice  cold  a/c. Van is set up for work with ladder racks and inside storage bins and shelves .Body  and  chasis   are clean with no accident history, just one small area where paint chipped has minor  surface rust but not rot  and drivers seat is split with foam exposed .Odometer reads 316 k but that's just the body not the drivetrain . Van was owner operated and well maintained and cared for. Bidders are welcome to make an appointment to come and inspect prior to bidding ,Call  908-910-4481  to make an appointment to view or with questions,


On Sep-16-13 at 14:48:19 PDT, seller added the following information:

In response to a few questions, I figure I would answer this way and share the info. with all 1.) The front axle is a Dana "SUPER 60" 2.)There are no fluid leaks at all anywhere on the van 3.) Motor runs smooth as glass with no noises or smoke. 4.)The bottom of the front doors shown in the pics. have mud spattered on them , it is not rust.

Auto Services in New Jersey

Woodstock Automotive Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 700 Berkshire Valley Rd, Succasunna
Phone: (973) 208-3060

Windrim Autobody ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 1339 Windrim Ave, Delran
Phone: (215) 455-5205

We Buy Cars NJ ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 5 John St, Avenel
Phone: (888) 726-1103

Unique Scrap & Auto - USA ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Recycling Centers, Scrap Metals
Address: 470 Chandler Rd, Monroe-Twp
Phone: (855) 656-3825

Turnersville Pre-Owned ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 2880 Route 42, New-Gretna
Phone: (856) 740-0221

Trilenium Auto Recyclers ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 147 Tennent Rd, Morganville
Phone: (732) 591-0006

Auto blog

Again? Ford issues second 2015 Fusion and Lincoln MKZ seat belt recall

Fri, Aug 16 2019

In 2016, Ford issued a recall for 603,392 2013-2016 Fusions and 2013-2015 Lincoln MKZs due to potentially faulty seat belts. Apparently, that wasn't the end of it. Ford announced another recall this week for the same issue, this time covering 108,399 2015 Fusions and MKZs.  In both cases, the seat belt anchor pretensioners are the issue. According to Ford, "increased temperatures generated during deployment of the driver or front-passenger seat belt anchor pretensioner could degrade the tensile strength of the cable below the level needed to restrain an occupant." Basically, heat could weaken the seat belts, and in extreme cases, they wouldn't be able to keep up proper safety standards. Ford knows of at least one injury that has occurred due to this issue.   The recall includes 103,374 vehicles in the United States, 4,002 in Canada, and 1,023 in Mexico. Possibly affected Fusions were built at Ford's Flat Rock Assembly Plant between August 1, 2014 and January 30, 2015. The MKZs were built at the Hermosillo Assembly Plant between August 1, 2014 and November 21, 2014.  As a fix, Ford says dealers will add an extra coating to the seat belt pretensioner cable for protection from the heat. If this recall might affect your vehicle, call your local Ford dealership and use recall reference No. 19S25. This news comes after Ford recalled 1.3 million Fusions and MKZs in 2018 due to the possibility that the steering wheels could fall off. Fusions have also been recalled due to the risk of rolling away.

Fitting Retirement: Grand Marquis last Mercury off the line

Wed, 05 Jan 2011

The signs have come down and retail production ended back in October of 2010. Now, the very last Mercury model has rolled off the assembly line. This last Mercury somewhat fittingly takes the form of a Grand Marquis reporting for fleet duty. It was built at the St. Thomas plant in Ontario, Canada, which is the same facility that continues to produce the Ford Crown Victoria and Lincoln Town Car for fleet and livery duty.
St. Thomas' days are numbered, however, as the factory is slated to close on August 31. When it goes, the Panther platform is likely to follow. So long, and thanks for all the fish memories.
[Source: Autoweek]Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

2016: The year of the autonomous-car promise

Mon, Jan 2 2017

About half of the news we covered this year related in some way to The Great Autonomous Future, or at least it seemed that way. If you listen to automakers, by 2020 everyone will be driving (riding?) around in self-driving cars. But what will they look like, how will we make the transition from driven to driverless, and how will laws and infrastructure adapt? We got very few answers to those questions, and instead were handed big promises, vague timelines, and a dose of misdirection by automakers. There has been a lot of talk, but we still don't know that much about these proposed vehicles, which are at least three years off. That's half a development cycle in this industry. We generally only start to get an idea of what a company will build about two years before it goes on sale. So instead of concrete information about autonomous cars, 2016 has brought us a lot of promises, many in the form of concept cars. They have popped up from just about every automaker accompanied by the CEO's pledge to deliver a Level 4 autonomous, all-electric model (usually a crossover) in a few years. It's very easy to say that a static design study sitting on a stage will be able to drive itself while projecting a movie on the windshield, but it's another thing entirely to make good on that promise. With a few exceptions, 2016 has been stuck in the promising stage. It's a strange thing, really; automakers are famous for responding with "we don't discuss future product" whenever we ask about models or variants known to be in the pipeline, yet when it comes to self-driving electric wondermobiles, companies have been falling all over themselves to let us know that theirs is coming soon, it'll be oh so great, and, hey, that makes them a mobility company now, not just an automaker. A lot of this is posturing and marketing, showing the public, shareholders, and the rest of the industry that "we're making one, too, we swear!" It has set off a domino effect – once a few companies make the guarantee, the rest feel forced to throw out a grandiose yet vague plan for an unknown future. And indeed there are usually scant details to go along with such announcements – an imprecise mileage estimate here, or a far-off, percentage-based goal there. Instead of useful discussion of future product, we get demonstrations of test mules, announcements of big R&D budgets and new test centers they'll fund, those futuristic concept cars, and, yeah, more promises.