Ford E250 Standard Cargo Van 4.2l 73k Miles Ladder Cutaway Van, Box Van on 2040-cars
Battle Creek, Michigan, United States
NO RESERVE 1998 FORD E250 CARGO VAN 1 Owner Automatic Transmission 73,670 low miles 4.2L V8 Overdrive Good tire tread AC LOCATION: Battle Creek, Michigan 49015 CALL MATT ANYTIME @269-317-1997 AUCTION ENDS THURSDAY @ 9:15PM EASTERN TIME Here is a great running 1998 Ford E250 Cargo van. This van has the 4.2L V8 gas engine that runs excellent. It came from a local utility company, it is a one owner that has been serviced regularly. It is reliable and ready for work. With the low miles you should have many more years of use. Van sells absolute with no reserve to high bidder! Don't miss out at the last second. Get your best bid in today! Van is great shape has normal wear and tear for a '98 model. Small area touchup w/ fiberglass was done....couple of off color white areas to be expected. Van will do the same work a newer one will do minus the huge overhead.Buy from a trusted seller - (( Check Out our Feedback )) - We sell great trucks - With great service- Buy with confidence! HERE'S MORE INFO
AUCTION ENDS THURSDAY @9:15PM EASTERN TIME VAN IS FOR SALE LOCALLY CALL TODAY MOST AFFORDABLE DELIVERY PRICES TO ANYWHERE IN THE COUNTRY- CALL OR EMAIL FOR A QUOTE (We've sold all over the world and are ready to assist you!) WE ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS Van is located in Battle Creek, Michigan 49015. Truck must be paid in full within 7 days of auction close. A $300.00 deposit is required via pay pal within 48hrs of auction close (DEPOSIT IS NOT NECESSARY IF PICKUP IS MADE WITHIN 3 DAYS OF AUCTION CLOSE). Van must be picked up within 21 days of auction close or a $50.00 storage fee will apply no exceptions please. Full payment to be Cashier's check, cash in person, wire transfer or Credit card-Visa- Matercard. Truck is being sold as is with no warranty expressed or implied. !!THANKS FOR LOOKING!! 1-269-317-1997 OR 269-209-5758 (MATT) |
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
1998 ford e-150 econoline explorer limited se conversion van hi-top
2008 ford e 350 xlt diesel cargo van extended length *l@@k*~1 owner~ no reserve
2013 ford e-150 cargo van v8 partition pwr group 14k mi texas direct auto(US $19,780.00)
2013 ford e-150 cargo van v8 partition pwr group 27k mi texas direct auto(US $18,980.00)
2013 ford e-150 cargo van v8 partition pwr group 36k mi texas direct auto(US $18,980.00)
2004 ford e-350 super duty e-series utility work van v8 work shelves am/fm
Auto Services in Michigan
White`s Auto Glass ★★★★★
Wheelock`s Muffler Center ★★★★★
Wellston Lube & Repair ★★★★★
Walt Sicard Car Co ★★★★★
Vyletel Volkswagen Buick GMC ★★★★★
Village Ford ★★★★★
Auto blog
Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?
Sat, Sep 23 2017If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd
Watch how Ken Block spent his weekend in Barbados
Thu, 22 May 2014Regardless of what you think of his skill as a racer, Ken Block is an expert showman. At this point, he has a career of showing up around the world to do vehicular stunts, and he's still able to go racing as well. It's a pretty sweet niche to carve out. Recently, Block was in Barbados to participate in Top Gear Live and the first event of the Global Rallycross Championship season, and Ford Racing produced a short video to show off his exploits.
It looked like a great show. Block got to race Lewis Hamilton in a Mercedes-Benz Formula One car and had a very weird crash during a Rallycross race that put his Ford Fiesta on its roof. Top Gear also released an extended look at Block and Hamilton's spectacle with the two of them expertly sliding around. Scroll down to watch the videos and get a taste of Block's tropical racing adventure.
American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings
Fri, 10 May 2013Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.