Cargo Van**strobe Lights**ladder & Storage Racks**computer Table**live Youtube on 2040-cars
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Body Type:Minivan/Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.4L SOHC EFI V8 "TRITON" ENGINE
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Ford
Model: E-Series Van
Mileage: 58,042
Sub Model: E250 - V8
Transmission Description: 4-SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION W/OD
Exterior Color: White
Number of Doors: 3
Interior Color: Gray
Drivetrain: Rear Wheel Drive
Number of Cylinders: 8
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
Ford e-350 cargo van powerstroke 7.3l turbo diesel - extended 7.3(US $2,777.00)
E450 mobile office bus 15' supreme cube passenger van seats 12 we finance!(US $24,975.00)
2012 ford e350 4x4 quigley conversion van v-10 397 low orig miles - l@@k!!(US $44,800.00)
Econoline e250 extended cargo work van adrian bulkhead bin package - we finance!(US $16,975.00)
Econoline e-450 25 person seating passenger van - low miles! - we finance!(US $16,975.00)
V8 econoline e250 extended cargo w/ master rack bulkhead e-tracs - we finance!(US $15,975.00)
Auto Services in Nevada
Welge Automotive ★★★★★
Transmission Specialists ★★★★★
Scorpion Motorsports ★★★★★
Ramirez Windshields And Glass ★★★★★
Preferred Auto Care ★★★★★
Pick-n-Pull ★★★★★
Auto blog
Preserving automotive history costs big bucks
Wed, 29 Jan 2014
$1.8 million is spent each year to maintain GM's fleet of 600 production and concept cars.
When at least two of the Detroit Three were on the verge of death a few years back, one of the tough questions that was asked of Ford, General Motors and Chrysler execs - outside of why execs were still taking private planes to meetings - was why each company maintained huge archives of old production and concept vehicles. GM, for example, had an 1,100-vehicle collection when talk of a federal bailout began.
Ford forced to recall Escape over fire risk yet again
Tue, 26 Nov 2013Recalls happen. Automakers hope they won't, but they do. And that's alright, for the most part, because cars are designed (and to a large degree still made) by humans, and humans make mistakes. So we forgive them, as long as the problem is resolved. Only in the case of the Ford Escape, the problem seems to keep coming back.
That's why Ford is calling in the Escape yet again due to fire concerns. The issue revolves around problematic fuel lines in 9,469 units manufactured between October 5, 2011, and July 11, 2012, all of which use the 1.6-liter EcoBoost inline four-cylinder engine.
As you yourself may recall, the Escape was subject to a string of recalls last year that resulted in a $17 million fine. One of them was over this very same issue, which Ford apparently didn't rectify the first time around. Let's hope this time is the last time.
Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test
Wed, Sep 29 2021The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video: