2006 Ford E350 Handicapped Passenger Van 86,000 Miles In Virginia on 2040-cars
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
WE ARE OFFERING A 2006 FORD E350 9 PASSENGER VAN WITH ONLY 86,000 ORIGINAL MILES. THIS IS EX STATE OWNED UNIT WITH AN EXCELLENT SERVICE HISTORY. THE ENGINE RUNS SMOOTH WITH NO LEAKS AND THE TRANSMISSION SHIFTS PERFECT WITH NO HESITATIONS. OPTIONS ON THIS E350 INCLUDE: 5.4L V8 GAS ENGINE, AUTO TRANSMISSION, POWER STEERING, ABS BRAKES, ICE COLD AIR CONDITIONING, 9 PASSENGER, DUAL AIRBAGS, XL TRIM PACKAGE, AM/FM/CD RADIO, REAR CARRIER A/C, WHEELCHAIR LIFT, PASSENGER SEAT BELTS, FOLDING REAR BENCH SEATS, ROOF EMERGENCY HATCH, HIGH TOP ROOF, RUBBER FLOOR COVERING,TILT WHEEL, POWER WINDOWS, REAR PRIVACY TINT, AND REAR BARN DOORS. WE ARE A VIRGINIA DEALER #4137, SERVING OUR AREA SINCE 1996. WE STOCK OVER 100 COMMERCIAL VEHICLES READY FOR DELIVERY!!! THIS UNIT HAS BEEN VIRGINIA STATE INSPECTED, SERVICED AND IS READY FOR DELIVERY. ALL RETAIL SALES ARE SUBJECT TO A $250.00 PROCESSING FEE TO COVER TEMPORARY TAGS AND TITLE TRANSFER FEES. WINNING BIDDERS MUST CONTACT US WITHIN 48 HOURS AFTER THE AUCTION ENDS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL (800) 569-7278 OR (757) 461-7552. THANKS FOR LOOKING AND GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR SEARCH.
|
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
- 1995 ford e-150 econoline conversion van
- Extra low miles ford premier editions lowtop conversion van priced to sell!(US $9,995.00)
- 2012 ford e-series wagon
- 06 ford e-350 sd xlt extended cargo long van 2-door 6.0l turbo diesel no reserve
- 2009 ford e450 arizona shuttle bus rust free 12 passenger ++ shuttle bus van!!
- 2007 ford e handicap wheelchair vans
Auto Services in Virginia
Xtensive Body & Paint ★★★★★
Tread Quarters Discount Tire ★★★★★
Taylor`s Automotive ★★★★★
Sterling Transmission ★★★★★
Staples Automotive ★★★★★
Stanton`s Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford C-Max, Fusion hybrids subject of MPG lawsuit in California
Fri, 01 Mar 2013A California lawsuit over the fuel economy claims for the 2013 Ford C-Max was first reported back in December. Based on the numerous reports we've heard of disgruntled owners failing to get their car's EPA fuel economy ratings on the C-Max and 2013 Fusion Hybrid, we suspected there would be more to this story. The Detroit News is reporting that two California law firms are combining their lawsuits against Ford on this matter for "false and misleading" claims.
The article states that there are hundreds of C-Max and Fusion Hybrid owners who have joined the lawsuit, but the issue isn't limited to customers. In December, Consumer Reports extensively tested both the Fusion Hybrid and C-Max and found that both hybrids performed significantly worse than their EPA claims. This all comes just a few months after Hyundai and Kia took the unprecedented step of lowering the fuel economy ratings for all of their 2012 and 2013 model-year vehicles.
Did a US automaker blow the whistle on Hyundai, Kia fuel economy issue?
Mon, 17 Dec 2012In all of the most hotly contested mainstream segments of the motoring universe, the difference of one mile per gallon averaged on a widow sticker can mean the difference between a sale and a walk-off - to say nothing of two or three mpg. So, when Hyundai and Kia were forced to reveal that many of their 40-mpg ratings were actually 38s and 37s, well, it made for big news.
It also, conceivably, made for a competitive disadvantage immediately, when the Korean automakers' products were being shopped versus the guys down the block. And it's that disadvantage that makes a recent story from Automotive News so juicy.
AN is reporting that Margo Oge, former head of the Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Transportation and Air Quality, got a tip in 2010 that Hyundai/Kia were "cheating" to get its impressive fuel economy numbers. The tip, said Oge (who retired from the EPA this past September), came from a senior vice president from a domestic automaker. The source was credible enough for Oge to launch an audit of the Hyundai figures, which ultimately lead to the debacle that we reported on a few months ago, and that the Korean company has been trying to bounce back from ever since.
Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Toyota Tundra flunk IIHS headlight test
Tue, Oct 25 2016The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put pickup truck headlights to the test and found that the majority of them were equipped with subpar units. The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was the only truck to earn a rating of "good." The large pickup truck test was comprised of the: 2016 to 2017 GMC Sierra, 2017 Nissan Titan, 2016 Ram 1500, 2016 to 2017 Chevrolet Silverado, 2016 to 2017 Ford F-150, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tundra. The Sierra's headlights earned a rating of "acceptable," the headlights found on the Titan and Ram 1500 were found to be "marginal," and the ones on the Silverado, F-150, and Tundra were rated as "poor." IIHS claims the F-150 was the most disappointing out of the large pickup trucks as both its halogen and optional LED headlights failed to provide adequate visibility during testing. The Ridgeline (which earned a "good rating"), is usually considered a midsize or small truck, though IIHS included it in the field of large pickups. The headlights on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, 2016 GMC Canyon, 2016 Nissan Frontier, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tacoma, which made up the small pickup truck group, all earned a rating of "poor." The IIHS claimed the Colorado had the worst headlights of any truck that was tested, as the base vehicle's units were only able to illuminate up to 123 feet in front of the car. The Ridgeline's headlights, for reference, were able to illuminate up to 358 feet in front of the vehicle. To conduct its test, the IIHS utilizes a special tool to measure how far light is projected out of the headlights in different driving situations. The trucks' headlights were tested in a straight line and in corners, while vehicles with high-beam assist were given extra praise. The headlights on the pickup trucks also mimic the testing that was done on small SUVs and cars earlier this year. Next year, automakers will need to fit their vehicles with headlights that earn a rating of either good or acceptable to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick+. Related Video: