Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Ford E-250 Raised Roof Center Isle Seating Captains Seating on 2040-cars

US $8,595.00
Year:2006 Mileage:158699
Location:

Hoboken, New Jersey, United States

Hoboken, New Jersey, United States
Advertising:

 

3/4 TON ECONOLINE E-250 EXTENDED
WAGON PASSENGER VAN

EXTENDED PASSENGER

HIGH TOP / RAISED ROOF

HOTEL STYLE 

5.4 TRITON V8

AUTOMATIC TRANS

12 AISLE INDIVIDUAL SEATING
PLUS DRIVER

POWER WINDOWS, LOCKS, AND MIRRORS

AIR CONDITIONING, CRUISE, AND TILT

Auto Services in New Jersey

Xclusive Auto Leasing ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 2445 Hylan Blvd, Avenel
Phone: (718) 517-2277

Willie`s Auto Body Works ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 127 Old Belmont Ave, Deptford
Phone: (610) 664-5886

United Motor Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Emissions Inspection Stations
Address: 3802 22 St, Union-City
Phone: (718) 472-4262

Ultrarev Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 750 Central Ave, Howell
Phone: (732) 938-3999

Turnersville Transmission Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 4791 Route 42, Blackwood
Phone: (856) 728-5111

Troppoli Automotive Used Cars ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1300 State Route 33, Point-Pleasant-Beach
Phone: (732) 774-3344

Auto blog

Weekly Recap: Volvo buys Polestar, makes performance a priority

Sat, Jul 18 2015

Volvo is taking its performance business in-house, and the Swedish carmaker announced Tuesday that it bought tuning company Polestar, which has long been known for producing sporty Volvos. The move allows Volvo to ramp up its performance business, and it plans to increase Polestar-branded vehicle sales to 1,000 to 1,500 annually, up from the 750 total projected for this year. The companies have been working together on motorsports projects since 1996. Financial terms of the sale were not released, and Polestar workers will move over to Volvo. Former Polestar owner Christian Dahl will keep control of the Polestar racing team and operate it under a new name. In addition to sales volume, Volvo has ambitious plans for other parts of Polestar, including its aftermarket business. Volvo also said it will use its twin-engine hybrid technology for Polestar models in the future, though specifics and timing were not revealed. Meanwhile, Volvo announced it will offer a run of 265 total Polestars in the United States for the 2016 model year, with S60 and V60s available. "Driving a Volvo Polestar is a special experience. We have decided to bring this experience to more Volvo drivers, placing the full resources of Volvo behind the development of Polestar as the model name for our high performance cars," Volvo CEO Hakan Samuelsson said in a statement. OTHER NEWS & NOTES 2016 Chevy Silverado, GMC Sierra, get nose jobs Automakers tend to refer to light updates as 'facelifts,' and that's exactly what Chevy gave the 2016 Silverado and GMC Sierra. Chevy slightly changed the front end of the truck. Using the one photo released of the new Z71 model as a guide, we can see that the headlights went from a stacked vertical design to single bulbs, and they are set on top of LED running lights. The grille has more body-colored elements instead of shiny metal, and the hood has a new line running down the middle (look really closely). The design theme will be similar across the portfolio, though materials and details will vary, a spokesman said. Some models, like the High Country and LTZ will have more chrome, and the LEDs are only for the upper trims. Chevy also said it will use the eight-speed automatic transmission on more versions of the Silverado, and it updated the MyLink feature to support Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.

Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #324 LIVE!

Tue, 12 Mar 2013

We're set to record Autoblog Podcast #324 tonight, and our friend Peter Leung (a.k.a. BaronVonClutch), who writes about racing for Richland F1 is going to teach us how to love the vroom-vroom. Drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #324
Geneva Motor Show highlights from Zach

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.