Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2005 Ford E-250 Base Extended Cargo Van 2-door 4.6l No Reserve!!! on 2040-cars

Year:2005 Mileage:135726 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Sherman, Connecticut, United States

Sherman, Connecticut, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Extended Cargo Van
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1ftns24w65hb15236 Year: 2005
Sub Model: Cargo
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: White
Model: E-250
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: Base Extended Cargo Van 2-Door
Warranty: none
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Cylinders: 8
Options: Roof Racks, Interior Partition, Shelves, Tow Hitch, Trailer Harness
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 135,726
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Mostly superficial rust due, a few dents from years as a work truck"

2005 Ford E-250 cargo van, this van has the extended cargo area. I'm a plumber and I could put 10' pipes in the back with room to spare. Comes with two shelves and roof racks. The van has a bunch of rust spots due to a sub par ford paint job. Most of the rust is superficial. There are a couple of spots near the wheel wells which are worse. 


This truck has run perfectly for me. It has almost new all weather tires, and just had brakes done. It is definitely ready to work, unless you wanted to make it a bit prettier first. Drives smoothly, and AC blows ice cold. Feel free to shoot me any questions you may have, or more specific photos. 

NO RESERVE AUCTION!   THE ENDING PRICE IS THE SALE PRICE! 

I will deliver it free of charge within 50 miles, after that you're on your own for pick up, or to arrange shipping. Thanks!

Ford E-Series Van for Sale

Auto Services in Connecticut

Valenti Motors Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 600 Straits Tpke, Beacon-Falls
Phone: (860) 274-8846

Tires Plus Wheels ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 888 Wethersfield Ave, South-Glastonbury
Phone: (860) 296-9799

Story Brothers Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 84 Burritt St, New-Britain
Phone: (860) 225-0159

South Valley Auto ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Automobile Customizing, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1109 S Main St, Torrington
Phone: (860) 482-2317

People`s Auto LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 23 Field Rd, Ellington
Phone: (860) 265-6861

Pandolfe`s Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Parts & Supplies-Used & Rebuilt-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 525 Christian Ln, South-Windsor
Phone: (860) 225-7791

Auto blog

Ford dinged by OSHA for asbestos at Buffalo plant

Sat, 20 Jul 2013

Ford has come under fire from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for violations regarding asbestos exposure in a company metal stamping plant in Buffalo, NY. OSHA has cited Ford for eight violations in total, according to an Automotive News report, and faces fines of up to $41,800. 537 workers are employed at the stamping facility.
The violations include a pipefitter at the facility being exposed to asbestos-containing material while working on a steam line, other workers exposed to the material without respiratory protection and work areas that were not designed to limited the number of workers in contact with asbestos. Further, areas in which asbestos was present were not properly restricted, and levels of asbestos in the air were not monitored.
According to an unnamed Ford spokesperson in the AN report, the company feels that the OSHA citation is erroneous saying, "We have fully cooperated with the local OSHA officials and we don't believe the citations are warranted." Ford also maintains that it will work with the authorities to resolve the issue.

Carmakers, NHTSA to unveil auto-emergency braking agreement tomorrow

Wed, Mar 16 2016

Happy St. Patrick's Day Eve. Tomorrow, there will be green beer, corned beef and cabbage, and automatic emergency braking for all. Weird combo, we know. But on St. Patty's we can expect an official announcement from a pact of automakers making auto-braking systems standard equipment by 2022. That's per a report from Reuters, which cites three sources familiar with the plans. Originally announced in September 2015 by 10 automakers and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the agreement is expected to be even larger when the details are unveiled tomorrow. According to Reuters, the manufacturers of 99 percent of the US domestic market's vehicles will be represented by the new agreement. It's believed that standard AEB systems could prevent thousands of accidents across the country. Expect more on the official announcement when it's made. Related Video:

Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?

Sat, Sep 23 2017

If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd