2005 Ford E-250 Base Extended Cargo Van 2-door 4.6l No Reserve!!! on 2040-cars
Sherman, Connecticut, United States
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Extended Cargo Van
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Sub Model: Cargo
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: White
Model: E-250
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: Base Extended Cargo Van 2-Door
Warranty: none
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Cylinders: 8
Options: Roof Racks, Interior Partition, Shelves, Tow Hitch, Trailer Harness
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 135,726
2005 Ford E-250 cargo van, this van has the extended cargo area. I'm a plumber and I could put 10' pipes in the back with room to spare. Comes with two shelves and roof racks. The van has a bunch of rust spots due to a sub par ford paint job. Most of the rust is superficial. There are a couple of spots near the wheel wells which are worse.
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
1999 ford hight top conversion van by superior van conversions very clean tv(US $8,250.00)
2002 ford e-150 conversion van american vans low miles 1 owner(US $7,995.00)
2007 ford e-250 cargo work van bins & shelves 4.6l triton v8 no reserve
Super duty clean!!!!! stahl work box dual rear wheels runs great!!!!!!!(US $6,990.00)
1995 green ford handicap van-w/ricon lift (low miles runs great)(US $7,000.00)
2010 e250 econoline super duty flex f 4.6l cargovan, pwr door lock wind mirr(US $10,000.00)
Auto Services in Connecticut
Valenti Motors Inc ★★★★★
Tires Plus Wheels ★★★★★
Story Brothers Inc ★★★★★
South Valley Auto ★★★★★
People`s Auto LLC ★★★★★
Pandolfe`s Auto Parts ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford dinged by OSHA for asbestos at Buffalo plant
Sat, 20 Jul 2013Ford has come under fire from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for violations regarding asbestos exposure in a company metal stamping plant in Buffalo, NY. OSHA has cited Ford for eight violations in total, according to an Automotive News report, and faces fines of up to $41,800. 537 workers are employed at the stamping facility.
The violations include a pipefitter at the facility being exposed to asbestos-containing material while working on a steam line, other workers exposed to the material without respiratory protection and work areas that were not designed to limited the number of workers in contact with asbestos. Further, areas in which asbestos was present were not properly restricted, and levels of asbestos in the air were not monitored.
According to an unnamed Ford spokesperson in the AN report, the company feels that the OSHA citation is erroneous saying, "We have fully cooperated with the local OSHA officials and we don't believe the citations are warranted." Ford also maintains that it will work with the authorities to resolve the issue.
Carmakers, NHTSA to unveil auto-emergency braking agreement tomorrow
Wed, Mar 16 2016Happy St. Patrick's Day Eve. Tomorrow, there will be green beer, corned beef and cabbage, and automatic emergency braking for all. Weird combo, we know. But on St. Patty's we can expect an official announcement from a pact of automakers making auto-braking systems standard equipment by 2022. That's per a report from Reuters, which cites three sources familiar with the plans. Originally announced in September 2015 by 10 automakers and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the agreement is expected to be even larger when the details are unveiled tomorrow. According to Reuters, the manufacturers of 99 percent of the US domestic market's vehicles will be represented by the new agreement. It's believed that standard AEB systems could prevent thousands of accidents across the country. Expect more on the official announcement when it's made. Related Video:
Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?
Sat, Sep 23 2017If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd