2002 Ford E-450 Econoline Super Duty Custom Cutaway Van 2-door 7.3l on 2040-cars
Elmore, Alabama, United States
Engine:7.3L 445Cu. In. V8 DIESEL OHV Turbocharged
Vehicle Title:Clear
Transmission:Automatic
For Sale By:Private Seller
Body Type:Cutaway Van
Make: Ford
Mileage: 143,000
Model: E-450 Econoline Super Duty
Exterior Color: White
Trim: Custom Cutaway Van 2-Door
Interior Color: Gray
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Cylinders: 8
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks
I am selling my 7.3 litter turbo diesal 16 foot box truck with only 143000 miles on it due to loss of employment . The truck is sound and in good working order . It has a door between the cab and the box and comes with slide out ramp . Tires are in good shape the truck runs and shifts out perfect. Just replaced the fuel sending unit in it about a month ago and is working perfectly. Need to sell asap so i reserve to right to end the auction early with any reasonable offers. Have the clear title in hand with 0 leans on it. If you have any question please feel free to e-mail me and i will get back to you asap thank you for reading this and god bless
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
- Ford e-350 4x4 trubo diesel powerstorke 6.0 l quigley motor chateau 2006 savana
- E-450 shuttle bus 6.8l gas v10 runs great seats 14 rear air and heat unbeatable!(US $7,900.00)
- 2006 ford e-350 super duty base stripped chassis 5.4l
- 2001 ford econoline commercial cutaway deisel e-350 super duty 14 foot box van(US $8,900.00)
- 2008 ford e350 extended super duty xlt passenger van, 5.4l, v8, 44,434 miles(US $15,995.95)
- Quigley 4x4 diesel dually super rare - bug out van - rv low miles e3500 super(US $32,300.00)
Auto Services in Alabama
We Buy Junk Cars ★★★★★
Used Tire World ★★★★★
Thompson Automotive ★★★★★
Texaco Xpress Lube ★★★★★
Serra Kia ★★★★★
Robert`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015
Tue, Feb 11 2014Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper. For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011. The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors. While the adoption of SAE J2807 will be helpful for light-duty customers, those interested in bigger trucks will still be left with differing standards. There is no sign of the new tow standards being adopted for the heavy-duty market.
Ford trademarking 'Mach 1,' possibly for Mustang
Thu, 24 Oct 2013A legendary name might be accompanying the redesigned, 2015 Mustang when it finally makes its world debut - Mach 1. Stumbled upon by the team at Ford Authority, the Mach 1 title was found in a trademark filing with the US Patent and Trademark Office, and would revive a name last used on the fourth-generation, 2003 Mustang.
While the the 2003 vintage was well and good, the Mach 1 is really remembered for a three-year run from 1969 to 1971 - it's best to just forget the emissions-choked 1972 to 1978 Mach 1s - when power output ranged from a modest 250 horsepower with the two-barrel, 351-cubic-inch Windsor V8 to "375 hp" (actual output was rumored to be well north of 400 horsepower) with the righteous, 429-cubic-inch Super Cobra Jet V8.
What does the title hold for the sixth-generation Mustang? It's tough to say. The fanatics at Ford Authority seem to think Mach 1 could take the place of the Shelby GT500 at the top of the Mustang hierarchy, which sounds like a valid argument. At the same time, we could see the SVT Cobra moniker returning for the flagship model, and the Mach 1 doing battle with the Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 (unless the Boss 302 were to return). Confounding things is the historical precedent - the Mach 1 was responsible for the death of the Mustang GT in 1969, so it might make sense as a volume performance model.
NHTSA and Ford investigating steering issues in Crown Vic, Grand Marquis and Marauder
Fri, 11 Jul 2014There may be more steering woes for the Ford Crown Victoria. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened a preliminary evaluation into the Crown Vic and Mercury Grand Marquis from the 2004 to 2007 model years and the Mercury Marauder for the 2004 and 2005 model years because the steering shaft can jam. The issue could potentially affect an estimated 500,000 vehicles.
According to the regulator, there is a possibility that the driver's side heat shield for the exhaust manifold can rust, dislodge, and then wedge into the steering shaft. If this occurs, it leads to a situation where the driver can no longer control the car.
NHTSA has received five complaints of this happening, including one alleged case with an injury. In that situation, the car was driving onto the highway, lost control and rolled over. One occupant was hurt in the accident.