10 Ford E-150 Handicap Van Wheel Chair Lift 605 Orginal Miles Clean Runs Perfect on 2040-cars
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Body Type:VAN
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:8
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Ford
Model: E-Series Van
Trim: XLT
Options: HANDICAP VAN
Safety Features: WHEEL CHAIR LIFT, 605 ORGINAL MILES, HAANDICAP
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 605
Exterior Color: White
Disability Equipped: Yes
Interior Color: GREY
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Windows
2010 FORD E-150
HANDICAP VAN
WHEEL CHAIR LIFT
605 miles
SCOTT
2152802120
HI MY NAME IS SCOTT I AM THE OWNER OF EXIM AUTO INC AND WE ARE OFFERING A 2010 FORD E-150 WHEEL CHAIR VAN. THE VAN A 605 ORGINAL MILES. THIS VAN WAS PURCHASED BY A HOME THAT NEVER USED THE VAN. THE TIRES ARE ABOUT 95%. THIS HANDICAP VAN IS IN GOOD CONDITION AND IS READY TO GO TO WORK. THIS VAN WAS SOLD NEW AND NEVER USED. THE VAN IS SPOTLESS INSIDE AND OUT. THERE ARE NO SCRATCHES OR BRAND NEW. THE VAN COMES WITH A V-8 ENGINE AND AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION. THE ENGINE AND TRANS ARE 100%. THIS ENGINE RUNS PERFECT IT RUNS LIKE NEW. THE VAN COMES WITH THE HANDICAP LIFT THAT FOLDS DOWN FROM THE SIDE OF THE VAN, THIS VAN IS ADA APPROVED.THE CONVERSION IS DONE BY MOBILITY COMPANY. THE VAN COMES WITH ALL OPTIONS, FACTORY FORD RADIO, A/C/HEAT. THIS BODY OF THE TRUCK IS IN GOOD SHAPE, I SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS VAN READY TO GO. THIS IS A SIDE LOADING VAN. IT ALSO HAS 3 FOLD DOWN SEATS. PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT ALL PICTURES, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL ME WITH QUESTIONS. I CAN HELP WITH SHIPPING AND TRANSPORTATION. SCOTT 215-280-2120 |
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
- 2005 ford e150 wheelchair van,low miles,braun lift,driver and pass transfer seat(US $18,995.00)
- 2012 ford econoline van e 350 super duty extended 5.4l low miles only 500 miles
- 2012 ford e250 super duty cargo van 4.6l v8 rwd automatic flex fuel 17k miles(US $20,900.00)
- 2013 ford e-350 xlt 12 passenger van - like brand new +++rear backup camera+++(US $21,950.00)
- 2001 ford e-350 econoline van xl 12 passenger 7.3l powerstroke -- *no reserve*
- 2012 ford econoline e-350 super duty 12 passenger xlt rear a/c rear camera 21k(US $18,500.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Wright`s Garage ★★★★★
Williams, Roy ★★★★★
West Tenth Auto ★★★★★
West Industrial Tire ★★★★★
United Imports Inc ★★★★★
Toms Auto Works ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford won't be releasing GT500 lap times for the 'Ring, or any other car
Wed, 27 Nov 2013Trucks have towing capacity, EVs have driving range and performance cars have Nürburgring lap times. What do all three have in common? They should all be taken with a grain of salt. Currently, there is no sanctioned way to record lap times or verify production-spec cars - a lesson we recently learned with the 2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo - and until there is a way to do so (and there probably never will be), we'll never officially know the actual time it took for Ford to lap the 'Ring with its ultra-powerful Shelby GT500.
After posting a Ford-made video of a 2013 GT500 running around the 'Ring, the guys over at SVTPerformance.com (an enthusiasts forum not affiliated with Ford or SVT) wanted more answers. They got in touch with Ford's Global Performance Vehicle Chief Engineer Jamal Hameedi, who said until there is a way to verify the times and inspect the cars, Ford will not get involved with lap-time wars. In the email, Hameedi pointed out that the 'Ring is a useful tool in that it allows a wide spectrum of track conditions, but until there is a governed way to record times, there is no way to accurately compare cars head-to-head.
And as much as some may not like it, Hameedi speaks the truth. It really isn't possible to compare times from one car to another, unless those cars were lapping the same track at the same time with the same driver. Not that any of this means there won't be continuous wars by fans and manufacturers alike... in other words, feel free to voice your opinions in the Comments below.
Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid
Tue, Jun 17 2014It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.
Automakers want to stop the EPA's fuel economy rules change, and why that's a shortsighted move
Tue, Dec 6 2016With a Trump Administration looming, the EPA moved quickly after the election to propose finalizing future fuel economy rules last week. The auto industry doesn't like that (surprise), and has started making moves to stop the EPA. Ford CEO Mark Fields said he wanted to lobby Trump to lower the standards, and now the Auto Alliance, a manufacturer group, is saying it will join the fight against cleaner cars. The Alliance represents 12 automakers: BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota, VW, and Volvo. Gloria Bergquist, a spokesperson for the Alliance, told Automotive News that the "EPA's sudden and controversial move to propose auto regulations eight months early - even after Congress warned agencies about taking such steps while political appointees were packing their bags - calls out for congressional action to pause this rulemaking until a thoughtful policy review can occur." The EPA was going to consider public comments through April 2017, but then said it would move the deadline to the end of December. That means that it can finalize the rules before President Obama leaves office. The director of public affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, Jack Gillis, said on a conference call with reporters last week when the EPA originally announced its decision that it is unlikely that President Trump will be able to roll back these changes. Gillis also said on the same call that any attempt by the automakers to prevent these changes would be history repeating itself. "These are the same companies that fought airbags, and now promoting the fact that every car has multiple airbags," he said. "These are the same companies that fought the crash-test program, and now are promoting the crash-test ratings published by the government. So, it's clear that they're misperceiving the needs of the American consumer." There are more reasons the Allliance's pushback is flawed. Carol Lee Rawn, the transportation program director for Ceres, said on that call that the automotive industry is a global one, and many automakers are moving to global platforms to help them meet strict fuel economy rules around the world.