Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1991 Ford Crown Victoria Police Sedan on 2040-cars

US $1,450.00
Year:1991 Mileage:188500 Color:  Tan
Location:

Frazier Park, California, United States

Frazier Park, California, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Sedan
Engine:351 5.8
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: 2facp72g8mx107645 Year: 1991
Interior Color: Tan
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Crown Victoria
Trim: Base
Warranty: None
Drive Type: Rear
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 188,500
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Windows
Sub Model: Police
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Hello , thanks for looking . Up for sale is a 1991 crown Vic police sedan . It's in pretty decent shape . Been sitting for a while but starts , runs and drives . Needs tires . Has a 5.8 L 351 with dual exhaust . Interior is fair to good . Headliner has a lil sag and back panels around seat belts are missing fabric. Seats are decent . Clothe in front and vinyl in rear . Rubber floor mats etc . Car was bought from local sheriff dept as a retired gang unit car . Has dual spot lights 18-20" push bumper . Dog dish hub caps and rear deck lights . Still has headlight flasher hooked up . Car is solid . Has been started bout every 3 months and drove around the block a few time. . When started .  Runs strong and seems to shift ok . . Car is sold as is , where is . No warranty or refunds . Car will be shipped with a bill of sale in glove box and I will mail pink directly to you . Buyer is to arrange all shipping details . 300$ non refundable deposit due at end of sale and full balance within 48 hrs of sale end . Can can be picked up within 30 days of auction end . If not removed in that time car will be relisted and no refund will be given as the funds will cover storage for the wasted time frame . . Thanks and good luck 

Auto Services in California

Z Best Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2304 Mitchell Rd, Ceres
Phone: (209) 538-9800

Woodland Hills Imports ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 22055 Ventura Blvd, Calabasas
Phone: (818) 999-3523

Woodcrest Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Emissions Inspection Stations
Address: 18400 Van Buren Blvd, Rialto
Phone: (951) 780-3311

Western Tire Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 801 S Victory Blvd, Granada-Hills
Phone: (818) 842-2401

Western Muffler ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 4123 W Shaw Ave Ste 106, Pinedale
Phone: (559) 277-5667

Western Motors ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1530 W 16th St, Ballico
Phone: (209) 722-8085

Auto blog

Ford not backing down on MPG-based marketing strategy

Thu, Jun 26 2014

The Blue Oval may have to back off a bit from the green messaging. Ford has had to lower fuel-economy ratings on a number of 2013 and 2014 model-year vehicles, namely its hybrids. And that may force the US automaker to rethink some of its marketing strategy, Automotive News reports. Ford has spent much of the year pushing its fuel-efficiency improvements, with everything from a Super Bowl ad saying its Fusion Hybrid gets "almost double" the fuel efficiency of an average vehicle (after the recalculation, it's now more like 75 percent better) to claiming the Fiesta is the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid in the US (it's actually the Mitsubishi Mirage) to stating the C-Max Hybrid gets better fuel economy than the Toyota Prius V (it doesn't). Nonetheless, Ford doesn't plan on changing its mpg marketing emphasis anytime soon, the company said in an e-mailed statement to AutoblogGreen. "Providing customers great fuel economy is a key part of our Ford vehicle DNA." "Providing customers great fuel economy is a key part of our Ford vehicle DNA," the company said. "We will continue to highlight our vehicles features and attributes in our advertising and marketing, which includes fuel economy and fuel-saving technologies like EcoBoost and hybrids." Earlier this month, Ford said it would lower the fuel-economy ratings of models such as the C-Max, Fusion and Lincoln MKZ Hybrids as well as most of the Fiesta line because of mistakes in the company's internal testing data. It was the second change for the C-Max Hybrid. The good news for Ford is that its fleetwide fuel economy is up almost 40 percent from a decade ago, compared to an improvement of around 23 percent for Toyota. Still, while sales of Ford hybrids and plug-ins are about even with last year through the first five months of 2014, C-Max Hybrid sales have plunged 49 percent from a year earlier. Earlier this year, Ford admitted that the first fuel economy downgrade had a negative effect on sales and we can find proof in the numbers. Before that the change was announced, in August 2013, Ford was consistently selling over 2,000 – and sometimes over 3,000 – C-Max Hybrids a month. In September, it dropped to 1,424, then to 1,438 in October. It didn't climb back above 2,000 until May 2014. The second mpg adjustment was announced in June.

Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy

Thu, Jan 8 2015

With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer