Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1956 Ford Victoria on 2040-cars

Year:1956 Mileage:900000 Color: is in great shape as well
Location:

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

 My 1956 Ford Victoria is in great condition. She could use a tune-up. However, I have taken the time to put new interior, new tires, new paint, and a new front cross-member on her. There aren't any tears or stains in the interior. The exterior is great condition as well! The car has never been wrecked to my knowledge.

She has:

-302 Motor with a C-4 Transmission.
-Power Disc Brakes.
-Radio.
-New Paint.
-New Tires.
-New Interior.
-New Frontend Cross-member.
-900,000 Miles
-Clean Title

I've had this car for about seven years. I'm selling her because I'm ready for a different vehicle. She's been a wonderful car to have, I'm just ready to move on to something different.

Auto Services in North Carolina

Wilburn Auto Body Shop-Mooresville ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 264 W Plaza Dr, Denver
Phone: (704) 469-4468

Westover Lawn Mower Service ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Gasoline Engines, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2856 Westover Dr, Providence
Phone: (434) 822-0138

Truck Alterations ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Window Tinting, Truck Accessories
Address: 716 Smoky Park Hwy, Chimney-Rock
Phone: (828) 633-2600

Troy Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 100 N Lee Ave, Four-Oaks
Phone: (910) 892-7373

Thee Car Lot ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 2498 Gillespie St, Autryville
Phone: (910) 485-0077

T&E Tires and Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 2925 Eastway Dr, Charlotte
Phone: (704) 531-8095

Auto blog

Ford won't be releasing GT500 lap times for the 'Ring, or any other car

Wed, 27 Nov 2013

Trucks have towing capacity, EVs have driving range and performance cars have Nürburgring lap times. What do all three have in common? They should all be taken with a grain of salt. Currently, there is no sanctioned way to record lap times or verify production-spec cars - a lesson we recently learned with the 2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo - and until there is a way to do so (and there probably never will be), we'll never officially know the actual time it took for Ford to lap the 'Ring with its ultra-powerful Shelby GT500.
After posting a Ford-made video of a 2013 GT500 running around the 'Ring, the guys over at SVTPerformance.com (an enthusiasts forum not affiliated with Ford or SVT) wanted more answers. They got in touch with Ford's Global Performance Vehicle Chief Engineer Jamal Hameedi, who said until there is a way to verify the times and inspect the cars, Ford will not get involved with lap-time wars. In the email, Hameedi pointed out that the 'Ring is a useful tool in that it allows a wide spectrum of track conditions, but until there is a governed way to record times, there is no way to accurately compare cars head-to-head.
And as much as some may not like it, Hameedi speaks the truth. It really isn't possible to compare times from one car to another, unless those cars were lapping the same track at the same time with the same driver. Not that any of this means there won't be continuous wars by fans and manufacturers alike... in other words, feel free to voice your opinions in the Comments below.

Project Ugly Horse: Part VII

Fri, 12 Apr 2013

Devils, Details and Weight Reduction
There are many things I could call this exercise. A party is not one of them.
I've spent three days crammed in the axle well of this 1989 Mustang with nothing to keep me company beyond a trouble light, a DeWalt drill on the very last of its legs and billion razor sharp, red hot slivers of metal with an affinity for my most sensitive of regions. My joints are raw from crawling around on the concrete. I'm half deaf from the shriek of the spot weld cutter and the boom of the cold chisel and hammer.

2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost loses big power on 87 octane

Mon, Jan 5 2015

The 2015 Ford Mustang with the 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder is a pretty potent package on paper. With 310 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque, it boasts better performance numbers than the 3.7-liter V6, but with better fuel economy as an added benefit. However, if you're in the market for one of these boosted 'Stangs, you should probably keep in mind that it really prefers to gulp premium, 93-octane fuel. It can drink 87-octane swill in a pinch, but you're going to find significantly less power underfoot when pulling away. While it's not shocking that the ponies are dialed back with a lower grade of gasoline, an alleged page from a Ford training manual obtained by Mustang 6G purports to show just how much power is lost, though. According to this document, the 2.3-liter EcoBoost makes 275 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque when running on lower octane fuel. That's a substantial reduction of about 11.3 percent compared to when the engine drinks 93 octane. Interestingly, according to Mustang 6G, that finding was a bit better than expected, because a Ford engineer reportedly said power would be down about 13 percent without altering peak torque. In speaking with Autoblog, Paul Seredynski of Ford powertrain communications, objected to part of this document. While he couldn't confirm the specific losses listed for the Mustang EcoBoost, "torque remains unchanged" with lower octane gasoline, Seredynski said. He speculated this training manual page was "possibly from before the engine was certified" and therefore showed incorrect figures. Serendynski did confirm that the automaker recommends using 93 octane, and like all modern engines, the software adapts if it's lower. "Peak power would be reduced" by using a lesser grade, he confirmed. Featured Gallery 2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost: First Ride View 20 Photos News Source: Mustang 6GImage Credit: Copyright 2015 AOL, Ford, Mustang 6G Ford Technology Convertible Coupe Performance ecoboost ford mustang ecoboost