Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1955 Ford Fairlane Crown Victoria Black/showshoe White Amos Minter Restoration!! on 2040-cars

US $56,900.00
Year:1955 Mileage:0 Color: Raven Black / Snowshoe White /
  White Vinyl / Black Bodycloth
Location:

Miami, Florida, United States

Miami, Florida, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: U5DW232046
Year: 1955
Make: Ford
Model: Crown Victoria
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 0
Sub Model: Crown Victora
Exterior Color: Raven Black / Snowshoe White
Interior Color: White Vinyl / Black Bodycloth
Doors: 2
Number of Cylinders: 8
Engine Description: 272ci V8

Auto Services in Florida

Y & F Auto Repair Specialists ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive, Auto Transmission
Address: 5130 NW 15th St, Lauderdale-Lakes
Phone: (954) 978-7799

X-quisite Auto Refinishing ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1300 W Industrial Ave, Greenacres
Phone: (561) 292-3174

Wilt Engine Services ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange, Automobile Machine Shop
Address: 2202 D R Bryant Rd, Zephyrhills
Phone: (863) 858-4054

White Ford Company Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: Kingsley-Lake
Phone: (352) 493-4297

Wheels R US ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 920 N US Highway 17 92, Winter-Park
Phone: (407) 699-9993

Volkswagen Service By Full Throttle ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 6956 Edgewater Dr, Fern-Park
Phone: (407) 253-9081

Auto blog

Ford Ranger, UK Mustang, Hyundai Hybrid | Autoblog Minute

Sat, Aug 29 2015

Ford may bring the Ranger back to the US, the UK goes nuts over Mustang, and the battle of hybrids heats up with spy shots of Prius and a new Hyundai. Autoblog senior editor Greg Migliore reports on highlights from the week in automotive news.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"