Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Ford Bronco Classic Car/suv 1969 Wagon. Runs And Drives. No Reserve! 4x4 302 V8 on 2040-cars

US $7,000.00
Year:1969 Mileage:70719 Color: Red /
 Red 2 White
Location:

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Kissimmee, Florida, United States
Transmission:Manual 3 speed on Floor
Body Type:SWG
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:302 V8
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: U15GLF59980 Year: 1969
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco
Trim: Bronco
Options: Sunroof, 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, hurst gears, bumper winch
Drive Type: 4X4
Mileage: 70,719
Sub Model: Wagon
Number of Doors: 2
Exterior Color: Red
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Red 2 White
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

No Reserve On My 1969 Ford Bronco Wagon.  Has been Sitting For A Few Years. Engine May Need Tune Up Or Some Work But It Runs And

Drives.  Idles Good. Solid Good Chasis

Includes Original Hard Top In Very Good Condition. 

Fits 5 People With The Original Back Bench Seat Which Is Included. Newer Factory Front Bucket Seats.

Has New Flares. Has New Tires With 3 Inch Lift Kit. Has New Carburator. Interior Is In Very Good Condition. Has Bumper Winch

Front Windshield Has A Crack But Drivable.  Has Little Rust To Interior Tailgate And Under Front Fenders. Also Needs A Few Minor Repairs To

Be  Expected Of A Vehicle This Age Such As: Change Hard Top Back Latch. Needs New Turn Signal Handle.. 

 Needs New Weather Strips. It Could Use A New Battery.  Please see Pictures Which Shows These Minor Details Issues

Has  Title Milage Reads 85,474 in 1989. Odometer Currently Reads 70,719 Therefore Odometer May Have Been Replace for A New One Sometime

 After 1989 Please Contact Me With Any Questions You May Have.  I Encourage Anyone Interested In Bidding To View My Bronco In Person

Located In  Kissimmee,Fl Near Disney World.

Local Pick  Up Or Will Ship At Buyer Cost . Buyer Responsible For All Shipping Arrangements And Costs.

Auto Services in Florida

Zacco`s Import car services ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair, Brake Repair
Address: 6144 springer dr, Port-Richey
Phone: (727) 845-8657

Y & F Auto Repair Specialists ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 5130 NW 15th St, Lauderhill
Phone: (954) 978-7799

Xtreme Auto Upholstery ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery, Boat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 549 N Goldenrod Rd, Winter-Garden
Phone: (407) 674-9523

X-Treme Auto Collision Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 7526 Narcoossee Rd, Orlo-Vista
Phone: (407) 243-5599

Velocity Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 1136 E Altamonte Dr, Casselberry
Phone: (407) 383-3363

Value Tire & Alignment ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 587 105th Ave N Unit #28, Glen-Ridge
Phone: (561) 290-0127

Auto blog

Preposed class-action lawsuit targets 'defective' MyFord Touch

Tue, 16 Jul 2013

A national law firm, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, has filed a proposed class action lawsuit whose presupposition is that MyFord Touch is defective. Specifically, the complaint states that the system - as well as the MyLincoln Touch and MyMercury Touch clones - often freeze, fail to respond to voice or touch commands and have issues connecting to mobile phones.
According to Hagens Berman managing partner Steve Berman, MyFord Touch is a theoretically "brilliant idea" that falls short in actual execution. Said Berman in a press release, "In reality, the system is fundamentally flawed, failing to reliably provide functionality, amounting to an inconvenience at best, and a serious safety issue at worst."
Other MFT issues enumerated within the 41-page filing include problems controlling the window defroster, rear-view camera and navigation system. The suit maintains that Ford is aware of the problem but has yet to submit a workable and acceptable solution to MFT customers. Scroll down if you'd like to read the full press release.

Ford taken to task by gov't for Chicken Tax end-around

Mon, 23 Sep 2013

Ford is in a bit of a pickle for importing and selling Turkey-built Transit Connect cargo vans as passenger vehicles in the US, then converting them to commercial-vehicle specification stateside in an effort to bypass a 25-percent tax imposed on vehicles imported for commercial use. Automakers are required to pay a 2.5-percent tax on imported passenger vehicles.
The Blue Oval got into trouble for this in a January ruling in which U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials asked Ford to stop the practice of importing the Transit Connect vehicles with passenger seats, then removing and shredding them. Now Automotive News reports that Ford is appealing the ruling. The 25-percent "Chicken Tax," as the tariff is often called, is 50 years old and was enacted as a response to a German tariff on chickens. Like Ford, Chrysler bypasses the higher tariff, but it does so in a different manner. It partially disassembles Sprinter cargo vans before shipping them to the US, then rebuilds them at a plant in South Carolina.
But the ruling against Ford's strategy states that it "serves no manufacturing or commercial purpose" and is there to "manipulate the tariff schedule," Automotive News reports. As Ford's appeal goes through, it is importing the Transit Connect and paying the higher tax, hoping for a favorable outcome and planning to build the next-generation Transit Connect, which it plans to launch before the end of the year, in Spain.

NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights

Sat, Aug 15 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.