Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Black Betty on 2040-cars

US $11,000.00
Year:1995 Mileage:12000 Color: Black /
 Gray
Location:

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States
Black Betty, US $11,000.00, image 1

Rebuilt engine 15,000 on it, rebuilt trans, A/C new, repainted flat black 2 years ago. We have a breakdown of all the upgrades we did. 3 inch rough country lift with 35’s, killer stereo, alarm system, so much more!! We love the Bronc! Bought a new truck so she needs to go to a good home! No accidents Clean Carfax

Auto Services in Oklahoma

T & W Tire Co. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 500 E Main St, Konawa
Phone: (580) 332-5145

Swanson Tire Co. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 1000 N Hudson Ave Oklahoma City, Oklahoma-City
Phone: (405) 463-2286

Stillwater Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Electric Service, Brake Repair
Address: 1821 S Perkins Rd, Stillwater
Phone: (405) 743-2611

Standard Machine ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Welders, Hose Couplings & Fittings
Address: 5610 S US Highway 69, Savanna
Phone: (918) 423-9430

Sooner Fiberglass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Fiberglass Fabricators, Boat Maintenance & Repair
Address: 312 SE 89th St, Bethany
Phone: (405) 632-8995

Ron`s Tire & Lube ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 17951 County Road Ns 222, Frederick
Phone: (580) 335-5029

Auto blog

Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]

Tue, 05 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.

Is Tesla's next project an F-150 competitor? [w/poll]

Wed, 13 Nov 2013

What's the future look like for Tesla after it launches the Model X CUV and possibly a smaller, sub-Model S sedan? Would you believe a pickup truck? Yes, Tesla could be looking to use its EV know-how to take the fight to Ford and the F-150, based on comments made by company founder Elon Musk.
"If you're trying to replace the most gasoline miles driven, you have to look at what people are buying," Musk said during an impromptu Q&A session following a speech at Business Insider's Ignition conference. "[The F-150 is] the best selling car in America. If people are voting that's their car, then that's the car we have to deliver."
And while the idea of electric pickup may sound kind of absurd to some, Musk makes a very valid point - if Tesla's goal is to replace gas miles with electrical miles, it simply can't afford to ignore pickups.

NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights

Sat, Aug 15 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.