89 Bronco Xlt Full Size Classic on 2040-cars
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.0Litre
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Model: Bronco
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: xlt
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: rwd
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 121,000
Exterior Color: blue/white
Interior Color: Blue
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
302efi engine, runs excellent.
121,000 original miles, mostly interstate travel.
A few very small dents/body flaws.
I wanted to repaint it but have lost my job and need to sell to keep up the bills.
Hardshell top is removeable but has NEVER been removed.
Interior is in LIKE NEW shape.
I also have a very expensive full body canvas cover for the vehicle. (Dark blue)
Back electric window glass is missing at this time but can be replaced for about $30 used or $100 new, currently I havent been able to locate a used one.
Im looking to find it a GOOD home soon. No emails, call "Cowboy" 8652070602
Ford Bronco for Sale
1978 bronco fully restored 4x4 9in lift 460 big block 456 gears
1975 ford bronco with hard and soft top.(US $28,000.00)
1990 bronco 66k actual miles! eddie bauer 4x4 lifted w/ new toyo 33's(US $6,000.00)
1995 ford bronco eddie bauer(US $3,500.00)
1974 ford bronco base 3.3l(US $23,500.00)
1973 ford bronco(US $16,000.00)
Auto Services in Tennessee
Troy`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Tire World & Auto Service ★★★★★
Snider Automotive ★★★★★
Simple Auto Repair ★★★★★
Safari Auto Sales ★★★★★
Roberts Auto Sales Lot 1 ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost loses big power on 87 octane
Mon, Jan 5 2015The 2015 Ford Mustang with the 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder is a pretty potent package on paper. With 310 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque, it boasts better performance numbers than the 3.7-liter V6, but with better fuel economy as an added benefit. However, if you're in the market for one of these boosted 'Stangs, you should probably keep in mind that it really prefers to gulp premium, 93-octane fuel. It can drink 87-octane swill in a pinch, but you're going to find significantly less power underfoot when pulling away. While it's not shocking that the ponies are dialed back with a lower grade of gasoline, an alleged page from a Ford training manual obtained by Mustang 6G purports to show just how much power is lost, though. According to this document, the 2.3-liter EcoBoost makes 275 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque when running on lower octane fuel. That's a substantial reduction of about 11.3 percent compared to when the engine drinks 93 octane. Interestingly, according to Mustang 6G, that finding was a bit better than expected, because a Ford engineer reportedly said power would be down about 13 percent without altering peak torque. In speaking with Autoblog, Paul Seredynski of Ford powertrain communications, objected to part of this document. While he couldn't confirm the specific losses listed for the Mustang EcoBoost, "torque remains unchanged" with lower octane gasoline, Seredynski said. He speculated this training manual page was "possibly from before the engine was certified" and therefore showed incorrect figures. Serendynski did confirm that the automaker recommends using 93 octane, and like all modern engines, the software adapts if it's lower. "Peak power would be reduced" by using a lesser grade, he confirmed. Featured Gallery 2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost: First Ride View 20 Photos News Source: Mustang 6GImage Credit: Copyright 2015 AOL, Ford, Mustang 6G Ford Technology Convertible Coupe Performance ecoboost ford mustang ecoboost
Just in time for the holidays, Snowkhana 3 is here
Tue, Dec 9 2014The gift list for the 12 Days of Christmas is frightfully heavy on birds, so surely no one will mind if we sub out the three French hens for Snowkhana 3. Ford of Europe is back with another stop-motion video that – like versions one and two – throws a 1:64-scale Ford Fiesta in Ken Block livery around a fabulous world of action figures and make believe. This year's video "drives rings around some of the biggest YouTube hits," so those of you who've lost years of your lives to the greatest distraction since the human navel can put your knowledge to use. For anyone else just catching up, we'll help you get rolling: the opening Snowkhana scene channels Stalking Cat. You'll find the rest of your holiday homework in the video.
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.