Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1976 Ford Bronco Ranger Model. 10th Anniversary Edition on 2040-cars

Year:1976 Mileage:128798 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:302
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: u15glb84930 Year: 1976
Interior Color: Blue
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Bronco
Trim: Ranger
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: Four Wheel Drive
Mileage: 128,798
Exterior Color: Blue
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

 This is my fifth early Bronco since I was 16, and bought it with the intentions of keeping it forever, but we need a new kitchen so I'm having to part with it. It was the one I've been looking for, for years. I've always wanted the anniversary year Ranger with an automatic transmission. So let me start with what all I've replaced, and collected for it. New Transmission, New power steering pump,New exhaust from the headers back, New fuel pump,New edelbrock carburetor, New plugs and wires, New voltage regulator, New overflow bottle, New Radiator, Fan shroud, New master cylinder, New brake calipers,New brake lines, New proportioning valve, New rear wheel brake cylinders, New pads front and rear, New U-joints, New rear end bearings, New custom steering wheel, New center console. When I bought the truck it only had a soft top, I've since acquired a hard top, and a bikini top. It also had some nasty cloth seats, so I purchased original seats for it. Before we ran into Kitchen problems my next steps were going to be recovering the seats, stereo, and then the body shop. This is a great truck to restore due to the year, and that it's a Ranger package. There is a some rust, but very manageable, the under carriage looks great and rust free from what I've seen. My loss is your gain. Serious buyers only!

Auto Services in North Carolina

Window Genie ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Pressure Washing Equipment & Services
Address: 5300 Atlantic Ave, Raleigh
Phone: (919) 745-8048

West Lee St Tire And Automotive Service Center Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1100 W Lee St, Oak-Ridge
Phone: (336) 272-8616

Upstate Auto and Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 2040 Victory Trail Rd, Earl
Phone: (864) 487-9272

United Transmissions Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Towing
Address: 2615 Battleground Ave, Summerfield
Phone: (336) 288-3317

Total Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 413 Chatham St, Mamers
Phone: (919) 774-7509

Supreme Lube & Svc Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 13715 Nc 50 Hwy N, Benson
Phone: (919) 207-0085

Auto blog

2015 Ford F-150 claims segment's best payload, towing ratings

Mon, 29 Sep 2014

While we are set to drive the new, 2015 Ford F-150 in the coming days, there's a big piece of news on the latest-generation of the Blue Oval's bread-and-butter pickup coming out of Dearborn, and it focuses on the truck's hauling and towing abilities.
The new F-150 will have a maximum payload of 3,300-pounds (V8 models), and, perhaps more importantly, a 12,200-pound tow rating (EcoBoost V6 models), which for the first time are compliant with the Society of Automotive Engineer's J2807 standards. Those best-in-class figures are significant feathers in Ford's cap as the Detroit Three continue duking it out for the title of top pickup.
"As founding members of the SAE trailer towing committee, we will meet SAE trailer towing standards," Ford's Aaron Miller told Autoblog.

Ford announces two recalls, 442k vehicles affected in North America

Wed, May 27 2015

Ford is announcing two recalls for North American that affect a total of 442,300 vehicles and multiple model lines. The larger campaign covers the possibility of electric power steering systems that can fail in the 2011-2013 Ford Flex, Taurus, Lincoln MKS, and MKT; the 2011-2012 Ford Fusion and Lincoln MKZ; and the 2011 Mercury Milan. This recall affects 422,814 vehicles in North America, including 393,622 in the United States, 25,195 in Canada, and 3,997 in Mexico. According to the company, an intermittent electrical connection can cause the power steering to cut out, although manual steering would still work. Ford knows of four minor accidents from this issue, but there are no injuries. Depending on trouble codes from the vehicle, dealers will either upgrade software for the power steering control module or replace the steering gear. The second recall covers 19,486 examples of the 2015 Ford Mustang with the 2.3-liter EcoBoost turbocharged four-cylinder engine with a production date between February 14, 2014, and February 10, 2015 at the Flat Rock Assembly Plant. Specifically, there are 19,095 of these in the US and 391 in Canada. These pony cars can show elevated underbody temperatures, which can lead to degradation of the fuel tank, fuel vapor lines, and parking brake cable seals. There are no reports of accidents, injuries or fires from this, though. To fix things, dealers will install a better-insulated fuel tank shield, add thermal patches around the tank and parking brake cable, and put thermal wraps around the fuel vapor lines. You can read the specific build dates and locations for the models affected by the power steering issue in Ford's press release below the video. Related Video: FORD ISSUES TWO SAFETY RECALLS IN NORTH AMERICA DEARBORN, Mich., May 27, 2015 – Ford is issuing two safety recalls in North America. Four minor accidents and no injuries are attributed to one of these conditions.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.