1976 Ford Bronco 4x4 on 2040-cars
Dallas, Texas, United States
Engine:351W modified to a 393, V8, Gas
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Interior Color: Tan
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Bronco
Trim: 2-door Sport Utility 4x4
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 2 or 4 wheel drive
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player, Convertible
Mileage: 125,000
Exterior Color: Orange
List of extras:
BC Broncos 23 Gallon Fuel Tank with Skid Plate. BCB Heavy Duty Triple Pass Radiator with Copper core and BCB 2 Groove Aluminum Pulley. This truck has Goodyear Wrangler Dura Trac tires 31x10.5 15LT that have many many more miles left in them. Recent Dual Exhaust and Duff Headers. The engine consists of a 1969 351w Block 1970 DOOE Heads with polished exhaust ports with new stainless steel valves. Scat Crank 3.850 Stroke, Eagle Rods and .030 Keith Black Hypereutectic Pistons. Pioneer Harmonic Balancer and 351w Ford Motorcraft Oil Pan. Carburetor is a 670 cfm Holley Truck Avenger. When this Bronco was put together a new starter, alternator, water pump and fuel pump were installed. Added bonus is that it has had a Ziebart Rust Proof preventative treatment in the windsheild frame, rockers, door posts, doors and tailgate jam (a process of applying chemical to prevent rust).
Ford Bronco for Sale
- 1994 ford bronco xlt sport utility 2-door
- 1988 ford bronco camo paint job super swampers 4x4(US $5,200.00)
- 1967 ford bronco
- No reserve auction! 1994 bronco xlt 4wd ac az rust free suv! no reserve!
- 94 ford bronco, 5.8l v8, 4x4, only 82k miles, cold ac, former fire dept vehicle
- 1977 ford bronco custom-beautiful restoration-345 horse 306hr -np-435,must see!!
Auto Services in Texas
World Tech Automotive ★★★★★
Western Auto ★★★★★
Victor`s Auto Sales ★★★★★
Tune`s & Tint ★★★★★
Truman Motors ★★★★★
True Image Productions ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford recalling 850,000 cars and SUVs for airbag issues
Fri, 26 Sep 2014Ford has announced a major recall of 850,000 vehicles from model years 2013 and 2014 due to a problem with the "restraints control module."
According to Ford, a short circuit could develop in the module, causing the airbag warning light to illuminate. In more severe cases, dependent on where the short develops, the airbags and seatbelt pre-tensioners may not work in the event of an accident. The problems can be more wide-ranging than that, too, as systems that rely on information from the control module, such as the stability control can be affected.
With 850,000 vehicles affected, it's no surprise that some of Ford's volume leaders are covered. That includes the Fusion and Lincoln MKZ sedans, as well as the incredibly recall-prone Escape and the C-Max MPV.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
2013 Shelby 1000 unleashes its 1,200 horsepower ahead of NY show reveal
Fri, 22 Mar 2013True story: Last fall, I had the opportunity to spend a week with Ford's new 2013 Shelby GT500 - the Blue Oval's factory Mustang with 662 horsepower and 631 pound-feet of torque. It's an amazing beast, to be sure. I'm not sure if it was Michigan's damp streets strewn with potholes and wet leaves, but at no point did I ever say to myself, "You know, Ford is on to a really good thing here, but what it really needs is about twice the power." And yet, for people in warmer climes with infrastructure in better nick - or for those whose muscle cars live their lives out on the track, there's apparently sufficient demand to warrant just such a beast.
Quick studies will recall that Shelby American launched its 1000 last year to commemorate its 50th anniversary, but it is returning to the New York Auto Show with a fresh version based on the 2013 GT500 I drove. The 2013 Shelby 1000 whips up 1,200 horsepower on pump gas thanks to beefed-up forced induction, engine internals and cooling. Wisely, it also incorporates an adjustable suspension and big brake package to make sure those ponies have the best chance being safely deployed to the ground.
What price the world's most powerful "production" muscle car? $154,995 for starters - donor GT500 not included. What, no convertible variant?